Posted on Apr 22, 2021
Afghan withdrawal will make terrorism fight harder, says top US general in the Mideast
1.6K
7
4
2
2
0
Thoughts/Statements?
WASHINGTON — In a blunt assessment Tuesday, the top U.S. general for the Middle East told Congress it will be extremely difficult but not impossible for the U.S. to find, track and take out counterterrorism threats in Afghanistan once all American troops are withdrawn.
Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, said that armed drones, which can now get to a location within minutes from bases in Afghanistan, will have to be positioned much farther away. And he acknowledged that the U.S. has no agreements yet with neighboring countries to base troops, but is working on a plan.
“I don’t want to make light of it, I don’t want to put on rose-colored glasses and say it’s going to be easy to do,” McKenzie told the House Armed Services Committee, adding that if the U.S. needs to go back into Afghanistan because of a threat, it will require significant intelligence support. “It will be harder to do that, it is not impossible.”
McKenzie declined to say what recommendations on Afghanistan he gave to President Joe Biden, who last week ordered the full withdrawal of the more than 2,500 remaining U.S. troops by Sept. 11. He said he had full opportunity to provide his advice to the president.
U.S. officials have made it clear, however, that military commanders did not recommend the full, unconditional withdrawal. Military leaders have consistently argued that pulling troops out by a certain date eliminates pressure on the Taliban and weakens U.S. leverage in the peace talks with the group.
Troops will begin heading home from Afghanistan, for good, on May 1. (Capt. Robyn J. Haake/Army)
SECDEF hints at lingering US involvement with Afghanistan after withdrawal
Troops will be out by Sept. 11, but there are talks of continuing to fund Afghan forces.
Meghann Myers
McKenzie told lawmakers that the U.S. would have several options if it needs to hit a target, including a long-range strike or the use of manned aircraft or a raid by ground forces, which would be “inherently dangerous.” Lawmakers pressed him for details and he said he would provide more specifics in a classified session.
Over the past year, as then-President Donald Trump pushed for a complete troop withdrawal, defense and military officials successfully argued that any pullout should be based on security conditions on the ground.
WASHINGTON — In a blunt assessment Tuesday, the top U.S. general for the Middle East told Congress it will be extremely difficult but not impossible for the U.S. to find, track and take out counterterrorism threats in Afghanistan once all American troops are withdrawn.
Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, said that armed drones, which can now get to a location within minutes from bases in Afghanistan, will have to be positioned much farther away. And he acknowledged that the U.S. has no agreements yet with neighboring countries to base troops, but is working on a plan.
“I don’t want to make light of it, I don’t want to put on rose-colored glasses and say it’s going to be easy to do,” McKenzie told the House Armed Services Committee, adding that if the U.S. needs to go back into Afghanistan because of a threat, it will require significant intelligence support. “It will be harder to do that, it is not impossible.”
McKenzie declined to say what recommendations on Afghanistan he gave to President Joe Biden, who last week ordered the full withdrawal of the more than 2,500 remaining U.S. troops by Sept. 11. He said he had full opportunity to provide his advice to the president.
U.S. officials have made it clear, however, that military commanders did not recommend the full, unconditional withdrawal. Military leaders have consistently argued that pulling troops out by a certain date eliminates pressure on the Taliban and weakens U.S. leverage in the peace talks with the group.
Troops will begin heading home from Afghanistan, for good, on May 1. (Capt. Robyn J. Haake/Army)
SECDEF hints at lingering US involvement with Afghanistan after withdrawal
Troops will be out by Sept. 11, but there are talks of continuing to fund Afghan forces.
Meghann Myers
McKenzie told lawmakers that the U.S. would have several options if it needs to hit a target, including a long-range strike or the use of manned aircraft or a raid by ground forces, which would be “inherently dangerous.” Lawmakers pressed him for details and he said he would provide more specifics in a classified session.
Over the past year, as then-President Donald Trump pushed for a complete troop withdrawal, defense and military officials successfully argued that any pullout should be based on security conditions on the ground.
Afghan withdrawal will make terrorism fight harder, says top US general in the Mideast
Posted from militarytimes.comPosted in these groups: War on Terror Middle East Office of the President (POTUS) Foreign Policy Troops
Posted 3 y ago
Responses: 2
Posted 3 y ago
Top brass don't want to pull out because congress funds this separate from their budget, I see no reason why we should stay personally, nothing has changed in the 20 years we have been there what is going to change in the next few years.
(1)
Comment
(0)
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
3 y
I was part of logistics in 2014 over there and yes congress was funding the afghan operations separate from the annual Pentagon budget, and yes a clever general or admiral could slip some pork into that budget ship it in country and then just bring it back in a few months.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Posted 3 y ago
"that we but teach bloody instruction, which returns to plague the inventor"
MacBeth
I might not have it quite right
MacBeth
I might not have it quite right
(0)
Comment
(0)
Read This Next