Why can't we teach both the 1776 and 1619 curriculum? Isn't it teachers jobs to teach non-biased education?

PFC (Join to see) I think the difference between creation theories and the xountry's history is just that. One is a theory and one is not. If we start saying that history is relative because everyone from that time period is dead, then we are hurting our children more than helping.

CPL (Join to see) You're right in a point. We are hurting our children but by not teaching the raw truth we are no better than our ancestors. I just believe we're at a tipping point now

PFC (Join to see) I agree that all history must be taught, both the good and the bad. But the 1619 project only teaches the evil of America. Its designed to make this country look like it has only done bad. If this country was never any good, why stand in the way of it being fundamentally changed?

CPL (Join to see) I believe both should be taught because you can't acknowledge only the good a country has done or the good times it only had. I walk the gray line on most things. We aren't a bad nation fundamentally but we have a bad past and we've done things we aren't proud of but we've always tried to right our wrongs and that's the point I want to ge across.

For someone that has a masters degree in "school law", what ever the hell that means, you do not know what a fallacy is. Appeal to authority. Listen to me, I know because someone told me I knew.