Posted on Feb 6, 2020

Filed: Department of Justice Criminal Complaint Against Rep. Nancy Pelosi

811

Al Capone was imprisoned for failing to pay taxes. Why not this?

While not happy with everything the House and Senate decides, they are our elected representatives. We put them there. And, in the last 20 years plus, there have been too many instances of brazen disrespect and the answer is a shrug of the shoulders. Uh huh! It is up to us, We the People, to correct these faux pas'.

Filed: Department of Justice Criminal Complaint Against Rep. Nancy Pelosi

Posted from patriotpost.us

Posted in these groups: Images %283%29

Government Original

Crime

Posted 4 y ago

Responses: 7

Capt Gregory Prickett

Posted 4 y ago

What a bunch of moronic drivel. Why is it that people that claim to support the Constitution conveniently forget provisions of the Constitution when it protects those who they do not like. Pelosi is not subject to prosecution for 18 USC 2071 for an action of hers on the floor of the House that is covered under the speech and debate clause.

If you want to prosecute her, you'll have to amend the Constitution.

(6)

Comment

(0)

Patricia Overmeyer

4 y

Capt Gregory Prickett: And it was not filed with her as an official document, just as the person who typed it into the teleprompter earlier in the day didn't have it filed with that person, and all the copies that went to all the House and Senate members didn't have it filed with them, blah, blah, blah. Then there is the fact that it was a copy and ripping, shredding, etc. of copies are not a violation of the law. Another load of crap thrown on the wall to see what will stick. Meh.

(2)

(0)

Capt Gregory Prickett

4 y

Patricia Overmeyer - My position would still be that she's covered by the speech and debate clause, as her demonstration was unquestionably speech on the House floor. It would be up to the House to take action against her, and that's not going to happen.

(3)

(0)

Patricia Overmeyer

4 y

Capt Gregory Prickett - That would be my second argument. The first would be to attack on the basis of the act not meeting the requirements in the actual statute. The House Speech and Debate Clause would also be my argument against any censure sought by the House itself. This screaming from Matt Gaetz about Pelosi "violating the law" is rather ironic.

(2)

(0)

1SG (Join to see)

Posted 4 y ago

What a load of BS. But it is to be expected from those quarters.

(6)

Comment

(0)

show previous comments

1SG (Join to see)

4 y

SSgt William Quinn - precisely

(2)

(0)

SSgt William Quinn

4 y

Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

you sure? Mutilate? Destroys? Obliterates?

(0)

Capt Gregory Prickett

4 y

Billy, try reading the Constitution. Look for the Speech and Debate clause. It at Article 1, Section 6, Clause 1. Once you read it, come back and I'll explain it for you.

(4)

(0)