Political Correctness
Political Correctness
Posted on Apr 9, 2018
Mueller Investigating Ukrainian’s $150,000 Payment for a Trump Appearance
2.2K
80
29
8
8
0
Wow....I do not remember anyone investigating Bill Clinton's $500K speech...never any consequences... HRC had lots of 20 minute speeches for a$250K. That was all good. Seems the country had finally got morals? Why was DT getting such a small amount compared to the Clintons.
Mueller Investigating Ukrainian’s $150,000 Payment for a Trump Appearance
Posted from nytimes.com
Political Correctness
Republicans
Democrats
Crime
Posted 6 y ago
Responses: 12
9
9
0
Mueller will maintain an open investigation so to gain political materiel for the 2020 election. Phase I: Obama used the FBI and NSA to conduct surveillance on team Trump and still lost. So what to do? Phase II: Get in the inside of the operation by stealing- I mean obtaining all confidential correspondence with Trumps lawyer. Notice a complete change in the narrative. No Russian collusion. But we now know there was a consensual relationship between Trump and a capitalist female 10 years ago that now must be investigated.
(9)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
Capt Gregory Prickett- your comment of "that's easy" is the problem. We either have a Constitution or we don't. Obama was the POTUS. Under his time in office, his 87 Billion dollar a yr Intelligence Agency team of networks discovered 1-3 personnel as you mentioned or inferred were in "communication" with Russian Intelligence Agents. I believe the 1 Trump campaign staffer to be Carter Page. We now have established two facts- the 4th Amendment means very little if a FISA Judge was convinced that a low level campaign member was all that was required to unleash our Intelligence apparatus against an opposing political team. And second if 1-3 members were in "communication" with the Russians why haven't they been arrested for a crime? You also use an interesting word in your last paragraph "if". So by your education in, knowledge of and practice of Law how many judges grant opinions on rumors and unproven possibilities. Or do judges and the law for that matter operate based on facts and evidence? What we have today is a banana republic with law for whomever the political affiliation favors.
(1)
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
LTC (Join to see) - you obviously don't understand what the Fourth Amendment requires. Let me know if you want me to explain what the standard is to obtain a FISA warrant, and what is required to keep such surveillance in place.
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
If you have the time I'd enjoy getting an education on the 4th A and the FISA application process.
(0)
(0)
7
7
0
Agreed, both of the Clinton's and for that matter, countless business persons have done appearances and speaking engagements for more without investigations.
(7)
(0)
7
7
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google