Posted on Oct 15, 2015
1stSgt Sergeant Major/First Sergeant
3.07K
2
4
2
2
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
0
0
0
This won't be a popular sentiment, but there is an awful lot of bloat in these programs. Consolidating some makes a lot of sense.
When I was demobilizing last year, it was incomprehensible how many programs there were for Families. Programs are good. But quantity does not equate to quality.
Having said that, these programs are peanuts compared to where defense dollars are spent. I suppose that this part of the Defense Department was ordered to conduct a review and make recommendations - and that is fine and appropriate. But if the goal is to save money, one can find much juicier low-hanging fruit than MWR and Family Programs. Many of these self-fund or draw much of their budgets from AAFES proceeds. Is that funding mechanism becoming inadequate? Are there other priorities that some would like to spend that money on?
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Electrician's Mate
0
0
0
sigh ... the politician always cut the most "painful" one to the "victims". :)
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Civil Affairs Officer
0
0
0
I'm all for budget cuts within and throughout the DOD, however, this article refers to family and MWR programs. Where's the talk about the 100 million+ to multi-billion dollar R&D projects that are never going to come to fruition (for various reasons). I'm for base commanders to be smart with their budgets and managing their programs effectively and efficiently - which will allow them to decide if programs should be cut based on performance (ie: active participation, effects achieved, etc..). I suppose I should research/google to see what the upper echelon in the DOD are doing at their levels to chop some of the DOD pork - where the cuts actually make a significant impact on the overall DOD budget. Who knows though, maybe i'm wrong in my thought process.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close