Posted on Dec 3, 2015
How does America’s past inform Afghanistan’s future?
5.06K
4
6
2
2
0
http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil/bookinfo.asp?bid=563
by Lt Col Marc E. Greene, USAF
A comparative history of Afghanistan and the post-Civil War US South societies reveals the sharing of three important traits: highly differentiated class structures, ethnically and economically diverse societal mosaics, and a belief in peripheral and societal autonomy. The author of this paper explores the prospects for either renewed civil war or stable peace in Afghanistan after US and coalition military forces withdraw. The comparison with the South after April 1865 suggests that political reconciliation with Taliban leaders, sustained peace, and stable economic growth are possible. The study concludes that Afghanistan’s fate rests with the Afghan people and not the international community, despite the weight of effort expended by the US and coalition nations since October 2001.
by Lt Col Marc E. Greene, USAF
A comparative history of Afghanistan and the post-Civil War US South societies reveals the sharing of three important traits: highly differentiated class structures, ethnically and economically diverse societal mosaics, and a belief in peripheral and societal autonomy. The author of this paper explores the prospects for either renewed civil war or stable peace in Afghanistan after US and coalition military forces withdraw. The comparison with the South after April 1865 suggests that political reconciliation with Taliban leaders, sustained peace, and stable economic growth are possible. The study concludes that Afghanistan’s fate rests with the Afghan people and not the international community, despite the weight of effort expended by the US and coalition nations since October 2001.
Afghanistan
Taliban
Civil War
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
1
1
0
Unfortunately for Afghanistan their heritage is Muslim unlike the United Sates which ranged from nominal christianity to sincere christianity SPC Dr. Ernest Rockwell.
Prior to the Civil War the South had significant economic trade with other nations particularly those in Europe. The lengthy coastline afforded many ports to ship cotton, sugar, tobacco and other products.
Unfortunately for Afghanistan they are landlocked in between nations which barely tolerate them at times.
Prior to the Civil War the South had significant economic trade with other nations particularly those in Europe. The lengthy coastline afforded many ports to ship cotton, sugar, tobacco and other products.
Unfortunately for Afghanistan they are landlocked in between nations which barely tolerate them at times.
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
I'm a southerner, and I spent some time in Afghanistan. I'm also a former student of Craig Symonds, whose probably forgotten more about the Civil War then I'll ever know. Respectfully, I'd say the comparison doesn't ring true.
To begin with, Afghan culture is potentially much more complex. Not only are there critical regional and tribal affiliations... but ethnic variations that don't mirror the relatively binary situation in the US during the 19th Century. Beyond that, the Taliban represents more an ideological movement than any official government. You simply cannot compare the Union and CSA to the Northern Alliance and the Taliban...a closer comparison would likely be the Protestant parliamentarians vs. the Royalists in the English Civil War. Even then however, it's impossible to make a direct comparison towards any feasible prediction.
My prediction is based on more recent regional history. Afghanistan was only and ever going to end up fundamentally Islamic...the only question was whether or not it would be extremist as envisioned by the Taliban, predominantly Sunni, Shia, or some mix of the two. I believe they'll drift towards maintaining a Sunni majority... which means the Shia will continue to be an "underclass".
To begin with, Afghan culture is potentially much more complex. Not only are there critical regional and tribal affiliations... but ethnic variations that don't mirror the relatively binary situation in the US during the 19th Century. Beyond that, the Taliban represents more an ideological movement than any official government. You simply cannot compare the Union and CSA to the Northern Alliance and the Taliban...a closer comparison would likely be the Protestant parliamentarians vs. the Royalists in the English Civil War. Even then however, it's impossible to make a direct comparison towards any feasible prediction.
My prediction is based on more recent regional history. Afghanistan was only and ever going to end up fundamentally Islamic...the only question was whether or not it would be extremist as envisioned by the Taliban, predominantly Sunni, Shia, or some mix of the two. I believe they'll drift towards maintaining a Sunni majority... which means the Shia will continue to be an "underclass".
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
I say the comparison of Vietnam with Afghanistan would be the best:
- If you cant find the enemy due to the terrain and mixing in with society you can't kill them.
- There was no way we can protect all the hamlets, and the enemy forced them to take sides.
- If we attack an area and fly out, the enemy still has the terrain.
- If we kill one villager, the whole village will despise us.
- Fighting ideology is almost impossible.
- We redefined victory in Vietnam. It's a democracy and it's time to leave!
- If you cant find the enemy due to the terrain and mixing in with society you can't kill them.
- There was no way we can protect all the hamlets, and the enemy forced them to take sides.
- If we attack an area and fly out, the enemy still has the terrain.
- If we kill one villager, the whole village will despise us.
- Fighting ideology is almost impossible.
- We redefined victory in Vietnam. It's a democracy and it's time to leave!
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google