Posted on Dec 5, 2015
Maj Chris Nelson
4.81K
9
10
3
3
0
So, we all know (or should know), that a 20 year retirement is akin to receiving a "retainer fee". We are subject to recall at the nation's request. With the re-structuring of the retirement program to become less "cliff-vested" and offer some type of retirement at earlier time frame.... is there any type of obligation to anyone receiving these funds to return to service in time of need? is there a greater pay-off at 20+ years that obligates THEM to some type of recall (at the nation's request)? I JUST had this thought hit me! What is your take?
Posted in these groups: Retirement logo Retirement38326e5d Military Pay
Avatar feed
Responses: 5
MSgt Curtis Ellis
2
2
0
Maj Chris Nelson Good question...
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Waldo Yamada
1
1
0
Just to entertain. The Space Force got me chimed in on the news. Well I don’t have much physical profile but I got 4 books for my medboard for psych evaluation. Wish I’d get recalled in. Yet, I signed the line to accept retirement right when I found out I could’ve just served in garrison. I’d say back back and gimme 50 feet. And gimme some spaace duuuu!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC A.M. Drake
1
1
0
In any agreement The "House" always win! So you can better your retirement dollars on the recall option will always be there.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close