Posted on Sep 8, 2016
CPT Infantry Officer
17.2K
164
90
10
10
0
Ok, RP. The two month countdown to the 2016 election begins today. Primaries are the crawl phase, and campaigning is the walk phase. This is the running phase of the election. Lots of talk has been directed at who would make a better commander in chief, but which candidate has the skills of a chief executive? Which candidate is likely to address egalitarian concerns of the general electorate? What is the public looking for this election cycle?
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 28
SGM Mikel Dawson
20
20
0
There are no PROs to a Clinton presidency.
(20)
Comment
(0)
MSG Wade Huffman
MSG Wade Huffman
>1 y
Nailed it!
(6)
Reply
(0)
SSG Tom Pike
SSG Tom Pike
>1 y
And the pros to a Trump presidency is that he's not Clinton.
(9)
Reply
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
>1 y
there is one pro she is the only sane candidate running
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL It Cybersecurity Specialist
13
13
0
While I'm no Trump fanboy, I simply can't get behind someone who has proven herself to have no integrity no matter how much experience she has. Let's face it, both sides of the aisle have placed the country into the position we are currently in so why not try out a non-lawyer/politician and try a businessmen for a change. If he fails, vote him out in 4 years.
(13)
Comment
(0)
SFC Gary Wysocki
SFC Gary Wysocki
>1 y
It's not the candidates who worry me. There were almost 20 Republicans running and it all boils down to Donald Trump, an outsider. I too am not a big fam of Trump. B ut I ma realistic. Hillary Clinton is the Malificent of today.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
CPT Jack Durish
>1 y
I'm with you
(2)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Dave Cutsinger
PO2 Dave Cutsinger
>1 y
I fail to see her shortcomings as any worse than her male predecessors. Yes, she is without integrity, as well as most of our past political leaders. I'm all about moving in a new direction, but when the known quantity will maintain the status quo and the unknown quantity says he's going to burn it down, the choice is clear for me.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG Platoon Sergeant
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
"If he fails, vote him out in 4 years." Sounds like a great idea... if we survive that long. =\
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Laborer
7
7
0
IMV, there is only one pro (for Trump) and one con (for the cuckquean). That is the Supreme Court. We can weather Trump for 4/8 years ... and perhaps even weather the cuckquean for 4/8 years. What will destroy us as a nation as we know it is the liberal SCOTUS that would result from a Democrat in the White House next year. It's the SCOTUS, Stupid!
(7)
Comment
(0)
LTC Laborer
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
As an aside, a humorous "pro" to a Trump win is the number of people that swear up and down they will leave our country if he is elected ... among them:

Lena Dunham
Samuel L. Jackson
Miley Cyrus, Cher
Jon Stewart, Raven Symone
Natasha Lyonne
Omari Hardwick
Spike Lee
Chloë Sevigny
Eddie Griffin
George Lopez
Al Sharpton
Neve Campbell
Rosie O'Donnell
Whoopi Goldberg
Chelsea Handler
Barbra Streisand

Make my day!
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Gary Wysocki
SFC Gary Wysocki
>1 y
Not to mention that Sotamayor says she will resign. That way Trump could appoint two justices and we could get a better footing on the Supreme Court for a long long time.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Capt Michael Greene
Capt Michael Greene
>1 y
LTC (Join to see) Can you give some examples of liberal SCOTUS decisions that would "destroy us as a nation?" Honest question.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close