Posted on Oct 27, 2016
SSG(P) Motor Transport Operator
15K
18
11
0
0
0
I want to know what ar to quote, if I wear multi cam's with sand t-shirt and sand belt with the sand boots.
Posted in these groups: 4276e14c Uniforms454274742x356 DA Pam 670-1
Avatar feed
Responses: 5
1SG Vet Technician
6
6
0
4.A. DURING THE TRANSITION PERIOD, CLOTHING INITIAL ISSUE POINTS ARE AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE TO ISSUE TO INITIAL ENTRY TRAINING SOLDIERS THE TAN/SAND COLORED UNDERGARMENTS WITH THE OPERATIONAL CAMOUFLAGE PATTERN ACU. SOLDIERS ARE AUTHORIZED TO WEAR THE SAND UNDERSHIRT; WHITE, TAN OR BROWN DRAWERS; SAND RIGGER BELT; AND TAN COMBAT BOOTS WITH THE OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM AND/OR OPERATIONAL CAMOUFLAGE PATTERN ACU COAT AND TROUSERS. THE TAN 499 UNDERSHIRT, TAN 499 RIGGER BELT, AND COYOTE COMBAT BOOTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED FOR WEAR WITH THE UNIVERSAL CAMOUFLAGE PATTERN COAT AND TROUSERS.
(6)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Retired
4
4
0
ALARACT 085/2015
(4)
Comment
(0)
SSG Shavonde Chase
SSG Shavonde Chase
>1 y
Also check the installation's policy.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Public Affairs Ncoic
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Once upon a time, there was a lonely ALARACT which said you couldn't mix
and match ACU/OCP patches.

ALARACT 086/2015 (which expired 15 MAY 2016) directed G-1 to incorporate
that guidance in DA PAM 670-1 (10 APRIL 2015) NLT 1 JULY 2015.

They did, kind of, on 25 May 2017, but it now only says that the U.S. Army
insignia and the nametape must be of a "camouflage pattern that matches the
uniform." Whereas the ALARACT specified "INSIGNIA AND ACCOUTERMENTS"
(everything) must match, the DA PAM which supersedes the expired ALARACT
only restricts the US ARMY and nametape. There is no such restriction for
unit or combat patches other than they must be "subdued." If you want, I
hear a yellow dry erase marker makes it match.

https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN1575_DAPam670-1_Web_
FINAL.pdf

However, "The wear out date for the UCP ACU is 30 September 2019."

In case you want see what AR 670-1 says about this, here it is: 19-16. g.
"How worn. See DA Pam 670-1."
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Intelligence Analyst
3
3
0
SSG(P) (Join to see) One question Sergeant, before asking this question, did you take the time to look it up yourself? It only took me 5 seconds to google multicam alaract. Or trying to find the answer yourself first has become a lost act
(3)
Comment
(0)
LTC Stephen C.
LTC Stephen C.
>1 y
A reasonable question to ask, I would think, SFC (Join to see).
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Retired
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Wouldn't asking your peers and SMEs be using available resources to find an answer? I agree, it didn't take me long to find it but if you have a message board of a million fellow service members, Veterans, and retirees at your disposal, why wouldn't you use it as well? The AR doesn't cover it and not everyone knows what an ALARACT is, including some people in command positions. I know asking a question on a BB seems a foreign concept to most of us "older" guys. It wasn't something we grew up with and may seem lazy to some of us, but it is a modern research source for those younger than us.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Intelligence Analyst
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) I totally agree that peers and forums and boards are there, but I think that first the individual should try to find the information and then if he/she can't find it or does not understand something, then you go ask to your left and right, online or whatever
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Retired
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC (Join to see) - I don't disagree, but a lot of people don't know what a ALARACT is. It's hard to search for something if you don't know what it is. When we went from BDUs to ACUs there were dozens of them but plenty of people who didn't know about any of them. If he didn't search for it, he should have. I won't jump to conclusions about that but he did use a valuable resource to find the answer.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close