Posted on Dec 12, 2014
Marine Corps Times
4.79K
54
29
3
3
0
B9315462311z.1 20141211141255 000 gpq9cne68.1 0
From: Marine Corps Times

Pentagon and State Department officials are reviewing what military and economic options they can employ if Russia continues development of a cruise missile it has tested in violation of a cornerstone nuclear weapons treaty between Washington and Moscow, senior U.S. officials say.

"Russia's lack of meaningful engagement on this issue — if it persists — will ultimately require the United States to take actions to protect its interests and security along with those of its allies and partners," Brian McKeon, principal deputy undersecretary of defense for policy told the House Armed Services Committee's subcommittee on strategic forces on Wednesday.

In July, the United States went public with its concerns that Russia violated the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) by testing a prohibited ground-launched cruise missile.

The document — signed in 1987 — bans American and Russian ground-launched ballistic or cruise missiles capable of flying between 300 miles and 3,400 miles.

But American officials said the Russians tested a new medium-range, ground-launched cruise missile as early as 2008, and Russian officials have been unresponsive to attempts at dialogue by U.S. officials, most resently at a series of talks in September.

Rose Gottemoeller, undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, told the House panel that Russia was also not in compliance with the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, and U.S. officials are concerned that Moscow is also violating other arms treaties.

Since Russia has refused to acknowledge its INF treaty violation, Gottemoeller said that "we are reviewing a series of diplomatic, economic and military measures to protect the interests of the United States and our allies and encourage Russia to uphold its nuclear arms control commitments."

Echoing McKeon comments about plans being made at the Pentagon, Gottemoeller added that Washington is "assessing options in the military sphere to ensure that Russia would not gain a significant military advantage from its violation of the INF Treaty."

McKeon said the U.S. could deploy active defenses to counter cruise missiles and beef up U.S. and allied forces in Europe and Asia.

"We do not want to find ourselves engaged in an escalatory cycle of action and reaction," he insisted, adding that Russian action and U.S. and NATO counter-actions "will make Russia less secure ... . This violation will not go unanswered, because there is too much at stake."

http://www.marinecorpstimes.com/story/military/capitol-hill/2014/12/11/us-readying-military-economic-response-russian-missile-treaty-violation/20254965//
Avatar feed
Responses: 10
1SG Michael Blount
4
4
0
Don't be so eager to pull the trigger just yet. Russian economy is showing every sign of crisis, with its currency trading at an all-time low, oil prices on a 5-year low and all this on top of economic sanctions. These people are their own worst enemy.
(4)
Comment
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
>1 y
CPT Zachary Brooks - this might be one of those situations in which "the best shot is the one you don't take:
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPT Chris Loomis
CPT Chris Loomis
>1 y
1SG Michael Blount - I sure hope you're right. I agree with what you're saying and have read about some of the same aspects you speak of.

I'm definitely not trying to "pull the trigger" just yet. I'm just a cynical guy....
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Michael Blount
1SG Michael Blount
>1 y
@2Lt Chris Loomis - Sir, I don't mean to come off with both feet planted in a cloud somewhere. However, if my enemy can implode with little help from me, who am I to say "no"? It's sort of like ISIS. They will burn themselves out. They're doing it now.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Eoc Ops Coordinator / Ga Certified Emergency Manager
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
The Russian Military does not want that trigger pulled either. Politicans are politicans regardless of what country they come from. They have no idea of the realities of War. I recall back during the 70-80s, ever so often we (11th ACR) would move out to the field on Alert and then set up for a review by Russian and other Soviet Block Generals being escorted by V Corps, in Germany.

The Russian and Soviet Block Generals would be shocked when they would get briefed by a Sergeant or Staff Sergeant or see a Sergeant operating a radio; or a PSG leading his scout or tank platoon from one location to another. This was unheard of in the Eastern Block Military.

The Russian Military does NOTwant to take us on....they know what the light will look like at the end of tunnel. The politicans do not have a clue as to the realities of War as a shooting battle against he USA would be a no-win war for them.

The lack of leadership, weak stance, and flip flopping signals by our President to Poutin and the Russian leadership only emboldens the Political heat and hype. Russia can take on the former Eastern Block countries and overcome them just by sheer numbers of forces. This will not work against the USA...the Military knows itand does not want to cross that bridge.

Hopefully the tigger will not be necessary to be pulled!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Steven Depuy
3
3
0
I hope I am wrong, but it seems to me we have kind of flipped positions from the 80's. I seriously doubt if they really care what we think or do. I don't think their leadership has any respect or fear of our leadership at this point.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Keith Hebert
3
2
1
this president will do anything all hot air
(3)
Comment
(1)
SSgt Network Engineer
SSgt (Join to see)
>1 y
I think our enemies have lost any and all respect for us. Not hard to imagine why they feel that way.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CSM Michael Lynch
CSM Michael Lynch
>1 y
HAHA Happy Monday to all. Thank you SGT Richard Blue for the drive by. :-)
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Richard Blue
SGT Richard Blue
>1 y
Actually ,CSM Michael Lynch my intention was to speak to your flawed post. I just got tied up in work and over looked the reply I meant to post. To start, you mention, “This president [Barack Obama] will [not] do anything all hot air”. This statement clearly shows that you don’t understand what has happened and what is currently happening. To start, President Obama signed both Executive Order 13660 and Executive Order 13661. A combination of sanctions put into place by our current president as well as a major drop in pricing in oil commodities has forced Russia into recession. Is this “hot air”? No, this is specific and targeted action that yielded tangible results!

Ok, some people just don’t like our president and I get that. But let’s not wield attacks based off falsehoods. Doing so doesn’t do any justice to the cause of progressing our nation’s status and goals.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SPC Steven Depuy
SPC Steven Depuy
>1 y
Driving down the price of oil in my opinion is not in the interest of our country. The only thing that has kept us from economic collapse the past few years is energy related jobs. The price per barrel needs to be $60 per barrel or higher for those jobs to remain. The Saudi's are playing a dangerous game. We have been mostly talk and have lost the respect and fear of much of the world the past few years. Do you really think Vlad is going to sit back and say OK, bankrupt me. World wars have been started for less.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close