Posted on Feb 10, 2015
SSG Norman Lihou
1.98K
8
5
1
1
0
Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Jonathan Greenert, is also quoted in saying that so far the re-deployment of U.S. naval forces to the Pacific theater of operations is proceeding as planned: “60 percent represents the percentage of our Navy that is home-ported west. The idea is it’s easier to rotationally deploy or to react if you have to, if you’re home-ported where you believe your focus of attention should be. We’re on track for that. As we build ships, we look toward home-porting them to the West and keeping that process going, because it’s not just numbers; it’s also the numbers with the most capability.”

Read more:
http://thediplomat.com/2015/02/are-the-ukraine-crisis-and-isis-threatening-the-pivot-to-asia/
Posted in these groups: Navy Navy979a8ca4 UkraineIsis logo ISIS
Avatar feed
Responses: 3
SSG Paralegal
1
1
0
The problem is that we have to deal with ISIS. That's not an option any longer. The Urkraine on the other hand we still have the leave it be option. But so long as terror threats abound in the mid-east we will have to be there.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Norman Lihou
SSG Norman Lihou
>1 y
I agree with you SSG Robertson Richard however the terrorists are not just limiting themselves to the Middle East area. Inspiring lone wolves and independent cells seems to be the new norm. The Australians just broke up a new cell today and there are two trials in Canada on top of the attacks at the monument. this also includes that there are major investigations going on with Canadian NGOs who have been funneling money to Hamas and other terrorist networks. There has been little done to stop the flow of those joining terrorists and the FBI says there are people in every 49 of our states who have ties to terrorists.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Paralegal
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
I absolutely agree that they are bringing the fight here. The fact is we need to seal the borders and have the Guard available to fight here while the federal troops deal with the fight over there. Unfortunately there is no political will for that.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Jack Durish
1
1
0
The problem I have with all of this is that We the People don't have sufficient knowledge to judge whether or not our national defense is being handled correctly. We never have. We never will. Strategic decisions are based on strategic intelligence and acumen and we don't have either.

Thus we are left with only our trust. Our trust in the Administration and our trust in our military leaders. Sadly, for many of us, trust is a scarce commodity these days. The lights appear to be on at the White House, but the President is rarely home. He's golfing. He's fund raising.

More importantly, the President assures us that he is better than everyone else at just about everything. He's a better speech writer. He's a better politician. He's a better diplomat. He's a better golfer. Does he think that he's a better military strategist? I'm not sure I heard that one...

The last person I heard who sounded like that was Sadaam Hussein. Remember? Remember his claims that he would defeat the coalition forces handily because he was a military genius. Wasn't it General Schwartzkopf who said he was neither and then proved it? President Obama seems in that league, with Sadaam, not Schwartzkopf.

So there's my problem. No trust, no confidence...
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ J5 Strategic Plans And Training Officer
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
Excellent post. Remember what the pivot to Asia means for the branches. Navy gets a bigger pie in the Sea-Air Doctrine, were as the middle east is Land-Air Doctrine.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close