6
6
0
Just want to see what everyone's opinion are. Would you prefer to take on the responsibility and challenges of becoming a Warrant officer in your chosen field and perfecting your skill, make more money and be the expert. Or would you prefer to go the other route, become a recruiter, basically control where you are stationed and help out your community and work with kids.
Posted in these groups: 
Military Career
Military Career
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 7
3
3
0
If there were warrent opportunities other than flight for me I'd take them. I regret not going CID years ago when I could have. Recruiting is a crap shoot. Land in the right station and you'll love it. Land in the wrong one and you may lose faith in the Army. It almost ended my career, but I fell into the latter.
(3)
(0)
3
3
0
SSG Schneil,
I would say the choice depends on your future military and civilian goals. I've had the opportunity to do recruiting duty and I considered putting in a WO or OCS packet. My recruiting time fell during the end of the TOXIC, "Get my numbers" era to the beginning of station missions and set hours. My first 16 months were rough. I was able to put in at least one contract a month, but my station commander was always on my back. Until I found my niche and made a name for myself in the community. That was the key during the TOXIC era. Every recruiter is different and had to find their individual niche to make mission.
Nowadays, recruiters have set hours; they don't work on weekends unless there is an applicant at the MEPS on a Saturday. You are not a one Soldier processing machine. The stations are broken down and each recruiter has certain responsibilities. Most of my battle buddies that switched to 79Rs love it now compared to when we first started.
As everyone has mentioned, Warrant Officers are the "Go to Techs" in their profession. There are great opportunities for training; certifications; schools; etc for Warrants. If you are looking at making a career after retirement in your current MOS, I would suggest the WO packet. If you are not sure, but know you love leading Soldiers and want diversity for career progression, I would go Recruiting. Volunteer packets will get one of the top 3 BN choices, but it's not guaranteed you will get to go where you want. Hope this is beneficial to you. Feel free to shoot me a message if you have more questions about recruiting.
I would say the choice depends on your future military and civilian goals. I've had the opportunity to do recruiting duty and I considered putting in a WO or OCS packet. My recruiting time fell during the end of the TOXIC, "Get my numbers" era to the beginning of station missions and set hours. My first 16 months were rough. I was able to put in at least one contract a month, but my station commander was always on my back. Until I found my niche and made a name for myself in the community. That was the key during the TOXIC era. Every recruiter is different and had to find their individual niche to make mission.
Nowadays, recruiters have set hours; they don't work on weekends unless there is an applicant at the MEPS on a Saturday. You are not a one Soldier processing machine. The stations are broken down and each recruiter has certain responsibilities. Most of my battle buddies that switched to 79Rs love it now compared to when we first started.
As everyone has mentioned, Warrant Officers are the "Go to Techs" in their profession. There are great opportunities for training; certifications; schools; etc for Warrants. If you are looking at making a career after retirement in your current MOS, I would suggest the WO packet. If you are not sure, but know you love leading Soldiers and want diversity for career progression, I would go Recruiting. Volunteer packets will get one of the top 3 BN choices, but it's not guaranteed you will get to go where you want. Hope this is beneficial to you. Feel free to shoot me a message if you have more questions about recruiting.
(3)
(0)
3
3
0
Since when do you control where you're assigned as a recruiter? Hands down, become a warrant officer.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google