How do you think quota-based policies affect readiness?

There were three reasons I got out of the military in 1985 after serving 9 and 1/2 years. This was one of them. This is not a new thing. Yes, promotions back then were also based on merit, however too many people were being promoted based on diversity also. There were way too may unqualified people being promoted into leadership positions that were clueless. Today I read the Army Times newspaper and see the results. Women who are commanding officers of warships being relieved of command. I saw were there was a female CSM in an Infantry unit being accused of creating a toxic culture. Once placed in these positions it is nearly impossible to get them out without consequences. I didn't like it back then and am so sorry to see what is happening in today's military.

IMHO, rank quota based on gender and/or race is not a good policy to have. I admit, there is never going to be (at least in our lifetime) a solid one-fix all. But, when you tell folks that certain genders and ranks will get billets because of what they are, instead of merit and hard work, all that will do is perpetuate the animosity and disdain. It's not solving a problem. It's keeping the problem alive.

Without a doubt. These programs affect readiness and also morale. The Army sets "Goals," not "quotas," for diversity promotions. The only difference in goals and quotas is the location in Webster's.
When ANYTHING other than merit and performance is considered in promotions it is wrong. It was wrong before, it is wrong now, and it will be wrong tomorrow.