Posted on Jul 25, 2015
CW3 Standardization Officer
10K
49
30
4
4
0
0c65670d
With hundreds of volunteers standing guard at recruiting stations nationwide, was an AD bound to happen? Does this change the view of quality or value of the efforts these volunteers are making? Does this mark the end of their efforts amongst many requests for them to vacate their properties housing recruiting stations?

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2015/07/23/recruiting-center-shot-fired.html
Avatar feed
Responses: 14
COL Jon Thompson
5
5
0
This is the same thing that I fear will happen when arming recruiters. Military service does not equal weapons proficiency and I heard about enough NDs in Afghanistan to know better. On one of my pre-deployment rotations through CRC at Fort Benning, we had an active duty LTC who could not qualify with the M9 pistol. I think recruiting stations will continue to be soft targets because it will be very difficult to have armed recruiters do their jobs at high schools and other events and even with trained civilians, that is not a long term sustainable force protection measure.
(5)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Standardization Officer
CW3 (Join to see)
9 y
COL Jon Thompson I think you have a very good point. Despite the amount of training people receive, this occurs. Unfortunately, if it were a military member the media would make it into a big deal and potentially a public safety issue.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Alex Robinson
5
5
0
Two things here. The weapon should have had the safety on. Second keep your darn finger off the trigger unless you mean to discharge the weapon... Common sense people. Sadly this is what happens when unqualified people, whatever their intention, handle firearms
(5)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Standardization Officer
CW3 (Join to see)
9 y
Common sense indeed, and some of the first rules you learn regarding weapon safety. Right after - don't point the weapon at anything unless you plan on shooting it.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SGT Anti Armor Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
I was thinking the same thing, it would only happen if some jackass keeps screwing with he weapon. Put the damn thing on safe and keep it in the holster. Stop fucking with it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt David L.
4
4
0
I said this before in another topic, but the law of averages says there will be a ND. It will likely be one reason the military disallows volunteer guards.
(4)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Standardization Officer
CW3 (Join to see)
9 y
Unfortunately the law of averages in this case came true.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Accidental discharge at recruiting station, was this bound to happen? Price of protection at recruiting stations?
COL Mikel J. Burroughs
3
3
0
CW3 (Join to see) This is what happens when you have civilians trying to help that don't understand all the precautions that we in the military take to make sure we don't accidently discharge weapons. I think with the clearing barrels downrange the emphasis we put on safety in combat as well as the ranges while in garrison makes us more aware of the problems and issues with accidental discharges. Yea is still happens and we issue Article 15s, but civilian don't have that level of training. I think this worked against us in arming professional soldiers at recruiting stations. Just my opinion on the matter!
(3)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Standardization Officer
CW3 (Join to see)
9 y
COL Mikel J. Burroughs you highlight some important points and I agree this is and will work against efforts to arm professional soldiers at recruiting stations. Weapon safety is always a key concern in the military for all training and operations. I remember how surprised I was during my first deployment to see clearing barrels everywhere, crazy!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Ed Ross
2
2
0
Edited 9 y ago
If the military is going to allow servicemembers to carry weapons on post then three things have to happened. First there must be a carefully thought out policy on who carries under what circumstances. Second, those authorized to carry a firearm must have extra training. Simply qualifying with the weapon is insufficient. Third they should be authorized to carry only the service issued side arm, not their personal weapons. This last provision is intended to prevent many different kinds of weapons with different calibers of ammunition--inter-operability.
(2)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Standardization Officer
CW3 (Join to see)
9 y
LTC Ed Ross you present some very sound logic in your response. It is amazing to me however, that your second post does not occur and any deploying soldier is carrying a weapon 24-7 / 365 when overseas. If our training is good enough to allow this, why would we need more training to carry at home?
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Ed Ross
LTC Ed Ross
9 y
Good point. In my view, carrying a weapon at home requires understanding of the national patchwork of gun laws and training similar to what police officers receive. Here in Northern Virginia you can commit a felony simply by crossing from Virginia into the district Columbia with a concealed carry weapon. My principal concern is that commanders play a major role in issuing firearms and making sure individuals have the appropriate training.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CW4 Guy Butler
CW4 Guy Butler
9 y
That brings up another point - recruiting TDAs don't have weapons authorized, so they don't have weapons on hand to issue.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Richard I P.
2
2
0
Edited 9 y ago
No such thing as accidental discharges. Negligent Discharges are prevented by the five safety rules. If only there was an organization that taught this to people from the moment they joined and provided most with extensive training in both weapons safety and employment. Maybe this organization could even have members experienced in this regular shooting, maybe even in combat.... we could call them the Armed Forces.
Maybe we could arm them.
https://www.rallypoint.com/answers/arm-the-armed-forces
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Walter Mack
SFC Walter Mack
9 y
That think you did there, Sir. I see it. Well said.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Investigative Analyst
1
1
0
Edited 9 y ago
Hello, sir.

A bunch of armed civilians gathering together for an otherwise noble cause. Yes, it was absolutely bound to happen.

Reed handed off his AR-15 when “someone asked if he could take a look at it.” Really? Someone he didn’t know just walks up to him and asks to see his weapon, and he let them?

Racking the bolt to the rear and letting it slam forward will not discharge a round. It’s designed to do that. It will eject the round in the chamber and seat another one (assuming the magazine is still in place), but it really shouldn’t discharge. Someone, Reed or the stranger he handed his weapon to, pulled the trigger.

Getting hit by a meteor is an accident. That was just negligent weapon handling.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Standardization Officer
CW3 (Join to see)
9 y
Regarding the meteor analogy, funny but well said SSgt (Join to see). Thank you for contributing to the discussion.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 John Miller
1
1
0
CW3 (Join to see)
Am I the only one who noticed that this was not the first time this "civilian guard" has had an ND? I'm extremely pro Second Amendment but take this man's guns away PRONTO!
(1)
Comment
(0)
CW3 Standardization Officer
CW3 (Join to see)
9 y
PO1 John Miller I am also very pro second amendment, but if you don't have the common sense to not let others handle your weapon or to properly clear it, you are a danger to those around you.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 John Miller
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Investigative Analyst
1
1
0
“Reed told police that he was holding his rifle outside the recruitment center when someone asked if he could take a look at it. Reed agreed, and while he was trying to clear the ammunition from the weapon, he accidentally fired one shot into the asphalt pavement.”

Reed. Reed. Reed. So, someone you didn’t know just walked up to you and asked if he could take a look at it, and you let him? Are you kidding me?

Also, I’ve had more than my share of experience with the M-4, M-16, and the AR-15. They don’t accidentally discharge when you’re clearing them. Regardless, it wasn’t an accident. Getting hit by a meteor is an accident. Negligent discharges are made because someone can’t handle the weapon.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Charles Williams
1
1
0
Yes, negligent discharges happen.... we need to work thru this. Most Soldiers are not used to dealing with weapons 24/7.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close