Posted on Jun 29, 2015
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
32.6K
68
44
3
3
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 19
LCDR Naval Aviator
11
11
0
PULHES generally refers to injuries or deformities, as far as I can tell. I'd say that sends a message that you can be useful even if you have a physical limitation.
(11)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Dave H.
9
9
0
It demonstrates that the world is not "perfect" . The NCO has skill sets and experience that are still valuable to TRADOC. Just because the PLT SGT can't "run" does not mean he can not perform in all other areas. Troops learn that the Army is a career, and if you develop certain amount of experience and training knowledge having a PULHES of 2 will not stall your career.
(9)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSG First Sergeant
4
4
0
I will be absolutely candid, In My opinion anyone that can't take a 3 event APFT should either be put into MEB (<15 yrs TIS) or retired (>15 yrs TIS).

Especially not being able to do the run. The ability to move your own body weight, another ~45lbs of kit, over unpredictable distances is a non negotiable skill all Soldiers should have.

I say this knowing some great NCOs that are physically restricted. But if we are to be a truly expeditionary, adaptable, and flexible army then we must only retain the best qualified people.

If you have to get a waiver, you are not the best qualified.
(4)
Comment
(0)
SFC Construction Engineering Supervisor
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
Wow, that's a little rough. So you're saying that those like me that are at 19 yrs and limited medically that have served honorably, not dodged deployment and are highly qualified for many things should be MEB'd and not allowed to reach a 20 yr retirement because we can't run?
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSG First Sergeant
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
SFC Brownworth, I just saw some of my comment got deleted... Typed it from a phone.

No I would draw the line at 15 years greater than 15 would be retired, less than 15 MEB.

And I would do this to myself also. I reach my 6 month mark for Medical determination post surgery in August for my shoulder. I will still be less than 20 years. If I am still not able to perform, I should be thanked for my time and sent back to the farm.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Fccme
CPT (Join to see)
9 y
1SG, I respect your personal philosophy of not desiring to burden the force with your injury. Most injuries do come as a cost of service however. And it is the rare individual who makes it to his 20 years of service without an injury of some sort.
If you are told, ""thank you, but you're too used up and no good to us now, so be on your way..." that isn't too much of a thank you. That is discarding old equipment. And we are not that.
I too have a permanent profile. Mine is for running. It will likely hinder my professional progress in the not-to-distant future. I am still working on overcoming the profile, but it hasn't happened in the last two years, and I may never.
It is my opinion that we keep senior personnel around, not because of their physical abilities, but what they are able to achieve through their spirit, knowledge, intelligence, training and experience. If those were not the reasons we have senior NCO's and officers, then why have them at all?
(2)
Reply
(0)
MSG First Sergeant
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
Sir, Congrats on making the list.

I hear that argument. But as we move to the Adaptable, flexible, and expeditionary Army the Chief of Staff envisions/ed, there is no room for " you're broke, but have knowledge so we will retain. "
We must only retain the best and most qualified. Keeping old guys around that are broke for the sake of knowledge is wasting billets. If you stick them all in TRADOC, you have a bunch of broke guys showing the young kids " perform how I tell you, and not as I can" If you leave them in FORSCOM, you have slots taken up that should go to the most qualified (physically and technically). If not you get a guy in the S3 shop that is poo hot but you lose him when you go into theater because he is non-deployable? That's bad business.

Anyone that can't hold up their end in any shape or fashion should be shown the door. And if I fall into that boat next month, then so be it. The ride was fun, and I know the cost of the Rodeo.
Now I'm not saying we leave these guys out in the cold. We seriously need to develop our VA programs to make it work.

If we truly want to build a Warrior ethos and Warrior way, this is the way to go. Most qualified, period. Anything else is a half measure.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
AIT Platoon Sergeants can get waivered for PULHES. What message does this send to our new recruits?
1SG First Sergeant
3
3
0
If you have a temporary or permanent profile you are not accepted into the course. You take three APFTs in the course with the last one being a requirement of 70% in each event. The course is physically demanding with doing PRT everyday some times twice a day two Foot Marches, obstacle course, running STX lanes and much more. When people come here with prior injuries that injury usually flares back up and they get removed from the course. If you get a profile 72 hrs or more during the you go home. If a AITPSG gets permenant profile on AITPSG duty they should be removed from the program because of the physical demand of the job. I understand that NCOs can perform with injuries however this is not one of those jobs because you are up in front of Soldiers and you should be doing everything that you require them to do. Unfortunately some Commands keep the AITPSGs on duty because of shortages. As far as waivers the only thing we have seen was a shaving profile however we still require them to shave especially if their DA Photo have them with a clean shave. If not unfortunately they go home. So from the Academy stand point we do not accept anyone that cannot perform these duties physically as well as mentally.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
3
3
0
I think that as with all things, whether or not a Soldier would make a good AIT PSG is based upon more than their physical capabilities. Not all MOSs are the same, so I can see an allowance being made if in the judgment of a competent authority the Soldier could meet the expectations of that duty.
If I read into the question a bit, what I assume that MSG (Join to see) is getting at is curtailing the possibility that Soldiers who fail to meet the standard are not put in charge of impressionable new troops, especially as a means to "hide" from the consequences by going to TRADOC. In this, I couldn't agree more. Only our best should lead our young men and women in IET. But I think that it is very possible that the best person for the job might be a Soldier who was wounded and lost a hand or leg. If they can keep up, who better to be a part of the institutional Army than a Soldier who can inspire?
(3)
Comment
(0)
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
1SG Jerry Healy I completely agree, however I don't think this is the case unfortunately. There is only a small percentage of directly related combat injured Soldiers who qualify for these positions. I do think TRADOC needs to put more effort into locating these war wounded Soldiers and develop them by offering leadership roles such as AIT PSG.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Civil Affairs Specialist
1SG (Join to see)
9 y
MSG (Join to see), I am citing an example that I could think of that would meet the test of a PULHES waiver in my mind. Leaving open the possibility that a waiver can be obtained in a unique case is not a lessening of the standard, it is exercising good judgment.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Healthcare Specialist (Combat Medic)
2
2
0
The message would be mixed. There are those who still believe that the best of the best should have these positions and therefore they have a PULHES of 1's across the board. The other group would argue that unless you have a less than 1 in PULHES in an area that would prove to be detrimental to the welfare of the troops and the leader applying for the job, let the person go for it. Obviously those with head injuries or mental instability should be looked at with a critical eye before allowing into these assignments but the majority would do well provided the records indicate they deserve that chance. The message ultimately indicates that everyone is able to get that special duty assignment despite injuries.

EKM
(2)
Comment
(0)
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
Good response Matt!!!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Walt Littleton
2
2
0
BEST JOB I EVER HAD!!!- see summary at the end!!!

Why PULSHES WERE IMPORTANT?

Day and a life of an AIT PLATOON SERGEANT!!!

THEIR UNIFORM
a. Starched BDU's
b. New shined pistol belt
c. Highly shined old steel Pot Helmet Liners (highly shined and waxed to a high sheen) and the schools unit patch mounted on each side.

Note: We accomplished all of this with no extra pay whatsoever. Hours were 0345-2000. We worked 6 days a week with one 24 hour shift of CQ duty and an extra 24 hour shift if it was your weekend for CQ.

DRILL SERGEANTS???
a. Two drills per platoon which is 10 per unit and an extra senior drill. PSG one per platoon and a floater with 5 total.

b. Full drill pay.

c. PSG had to train the drills to replace them. Even though they were drawing drill pay for two weeks to two months depending how many drills filtered in.

d. Over half of the drills assigned could not perform to standards at daily PT so the PSG were held over until the drill could perform to the standard of young trainees APFT 18 year olds.

I was an AIT Platoon Sergeant for school bound recruits 85-87. In those times if you weren't fully mission ready you were pulled out of being in that position. They became detail supervisors, barracks repair but not as we used to say Pushing Troops.

I was Signal and our school is at Ft Gordon, Ga. Here is how we were selected to either be assigned as Classroom Instructors or you were assigned to the school brigade as a line Platoon Sergeant. I was the last platoon sergeant to be replaced by the drills.

PLATOON SERGEANT-THIS ASSIGNMENT WAS BASED ON AIT BEING AN EXTENTION OF BASIC TRAINING- They were treated exactly how Drills did it in basic. We were Signal NCO's however, everything we did was monitored through NCO's assigned FROM TRADOC to monitor US and test the trainees. Trainees on day 2 are given a PT test performed by TRADOC. If one failed the PSG was required to retrain and unit tested throughout the school cycle and tested again by TRADOC at the end of the cycle so they were fully qualified by APFT and completion of standards for their MOS.

1. MILPO would screen all NCO's in processing the post. They screened by leadership, pulshes and type of assignments.

2. If you were chosen you were set up for an interview with the Brigade CSM. He was tough as nails, take no prisoners and dedication beyond belief.

3. Assigned to a unit. Units were set up in 4 platoons, 5 platoon sergeants (PSG). That's one sergeant for each platoon. Since there is only 5 platoon sergeants per company we were required to pull CQ 24 hours of duty every 5 to 6 days. At night or weekends even though you were off you were still responsible for your trainees if they got out of hand you would be called in.

4. Work starts for PSG's at 0330 and troop wake up was 0400 in formation heading to the parade/PT field and posted in front of your company PT stand by 0430. Yup CSM was walking the brigade and walked the field to insure we were on time and performing to standards. He would never interfere but you got called to his office for a butt chewing or if bad enough you got paper.

5. PSG were required to train to standards so the PLS had to train to standard levels of an 18 year old trainee. I was a SSG AND 31 and most of us were 30-40 years old.


6. PT complete back to barracks for (sh&t, shower,shave) clean barracks March company to chow hall. Move all outside so the clean up details could go in and final touch and prepare for the DAILY FIRST INSPECTION. CO inspection every week and Brigade CSM inspection Quarterly.

7. Back to barracks in formation. Check boots, haircuts, uniforms and insure pistol belts with rolled poncho and full canteen were worn properly straight and no sagging. They were checked at school by the Istructors who were training them. If there were any problems it went with a phone call to Brigade and stuff rolls down hill. Two PSG would march them to class and the students had to be seated in class ready to learn by 0800. We marched them to school which was about 2 miles each way. By then the PSG was soaked in sweat (GA) heat. We would walk back to the co.

8. Back to barracks stripped our uniforms repolished our boots, and inspected and corrected any cleanup issues to insure that when 1SGT inspected the barracks was ready. Then you had to repair or record and tag any facility items that needed to be fixed. If it couldn't be fixed by PSG we had to report it to facility maintenance tag and record the work order number. By this time we had to hitch rides back to the classrooms to march the the trainees to the chow hall for lunch and back to the classroom and you better not be late.

9. Afternoons were spent writing up counseling statements corrective actions and correcting any problems the 1SG found during their walk through.

10. 1630 back at classrooms to march students back to the barracks, mail call and march them to chow hall for supper.

11. After supper there were PSG meetings with their trainees, go over difficiencied found in inspections and counselings.

12. Due to having night students sometimes we had to assign a PSG TO HANDLE THESE TRAINEES BECAUSE THEY WERE ON A COMPLETE NIGHT SHIFT.

13. Cycles were 8 weeks long with student graduation on the last Friday of the 8 week cycle. THE NEXT DAY ON SATURDAY WE RECIEVED ANOTHER FULL COMPANY OF NEW RECRUITS ARRIVED (25o give or take new teainees.

Summary- Hardest job I ever had in the military!!

Spent 2 1/2 years in this position and here are my stats!!!! Yes I'm PROUD

TEN QUARTERS!
a. PSG OF THE QUARTER-- 6 Times.

b. Roughly 50 trainees every 8 weeks for over 2 years I never lost one trainee in my platoon. All graduated from AIT AND APFT with no failures!!

Nothing is more rewarding that see these soldiers come in and you can see the pride and motivation they display when they walk across the stage to graduate. Most this was their first achievement.

I NEVER RAISED MY VOICE EXCEPT WHEN CALLING CADENCE!!! TREAT WITH DIGNITY AND REDPECT AND DINT ALLOW SUBSTANDERD PERFORMANCE. IT TAKES AN FULLY QUALIFIED NCO TO MAKE IT HAPPEN.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SFC Section Ncoic
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
Interesting to see what this position was like "way back when" based on your experiences. My how the times have changed.... Same mission, tasks, and responsibilities but a much different Army. If you truly made it though 2 and half years on trail without so much as yelling at a Soldier(s), your level of patience and understanding is SUPERHUMAN! You certainly made an unmeasurable impact on our force and for that I commend you.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC PATRIOT Launching Station Enhanced Operator/Maintainer
2
2
0
I'm not so sure ABCP can be waved. The text reads:

"1) PULHES 111221; however, some conditions may be allowed via waiver; meet body
composition requirements in AR 600–9; and be able to pass the APFT (no substitution of events)."

I read that as certain profiles / PULHES can be waivered. In a seperate phrase, they must meet 600-9 & APFT requirements.
I could be wrong though.

The AIT PSG often has a big role in shaping young Soldiers, being overweight would send a strange and confusing standard... Double standard. I thought unless medically specified, everyone follows 600-9 requirements.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
You are correct. I will edit my question. Thanks.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
COL Charles Williams
2
2
0
MSG (Join to see) .... I guess trainees and Drills Sergeants can be over weight too...
(2)
Comment
(0)
SPC (Other / Not listed)
SPC (Join to see)
9 y
Theres an ex drill sergeant SSG in my company who is overweight/fat (busted tape on and off) and can barely run a mile. She also can't qualify to save her life but boy will she preach standards to you. Its honestly not suprising to me because some of my drills in basic were dirtbags too but there are still plenty of good NCO's out there enforcing and living the standard who never stepped foot in drill sergeant school or became an AIT DS.
(3)
Reply
(0)
COL Charles Williams
COL Charles Williams
9 y
MSG (Join to see) SPC (Join to see) I agree Drill Sergeants and AIT Platoon Sergeants need to be what right looks like. Those with profiles for combat related injuries are an exception, and are probably better suited for instructor positions, if they can't lead from the front with the regards to trainees. It is key, or leaders (at levels) lead from the front and by personal example. Talking the talking is useless, if you are not walking the walk. This is also not new. My Drill Sergeants when I was in OSUT (80-81) were beasts, but the Senior Drill was slovenly.... My 1SG, when I was an new Armor LT was fat as a house, and often would tell yell at the company in formation about kicking Soldiers out of the Army if they were fat or could not pass the AFPT...
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
I just left AIT land for 3 years and personally witnessed AIT PSG on permanent profiles. I've never questioned them about how they got the profile, but from my impression the "waiver" does not pertain to combat related only profiles. I worked for the NCO Academy and we usually frowned upon new Small Group Leaders who had permanent profiles. I do not want to discriminate, but aren't standards a form of fair discrimination?
(1)
Reply
(0)
COL Charles Williams
COL Charles Williams
9 y
MSG (Join to see) - I agree, NCOES, OES, DS, AIT, etc. should be what right looks like in terms of 670-1, 600-9, and APFT. The only exception I can see, is those with significant combat related injuries. Soldiers and Leaders in training need to see and experience the best and brightest.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Stephen Pate
2
2
0
I don't remember that waiver but I didn't have that problem. I don't think it should be authorized. The new troops see it, believe me they see it.
(2)
Comment
(0)
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
I agree, I spent 3 years working next to AIT Platoon Sergeants. I was a little surprised to read this in the article.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
MSG (Join to see)
9 y
I misread the article. Please see the edited question.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close