Posted on Mar 7, 2014
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
37
37
0
<14px;">, APPROVED, AND PUBLISHED!<br><br>2. New revision of the regulation will define the following terms: eccentric, faddish,conservative, inconspicuous, unsightly, hair braids/plaits.<br><br>3. AR 670-1 will be a PUNITIVE order in the new regulation. &nbsp;<br><br>4. Sideburns will not extend below the top of the ear. &nbsp;<br><br>5. Soldiers will be clean shaven on AND off duty (even during leave).<br><br>6. Female and Male hair grooming standards will become more restrictive and better defined(I'll have pictures for you at MHS).<br><br>7. Females will be allowed to put their hair into a pony tail during PT.<br><br>8. Males will be prohibited from wearing cosmetics to include nail polish, females may wear cosmetics conservatively, but can only wear nail polish in service, mess, or dress uniforms.<br><br>9. Females fingernail length will not exceed 1/4 inch, no fake nails, add-ons, or extensions will be authorized.<br><br>10. Tattoos will not be visible above the neck line when the IPFU is worn. Tattoos will not extend below the wrist line and not on the hands. Sleeve tattoos will be prohibited (this one will be grandfathered).<br><br>11. Soldiers will not walk while engaged in activities that require the hand salute (eating, cell phone use, smoking, etc.).<br><br>12. ACUs will not be commercially pressed; hand ironing of the ACU only will be authorized.</span></font></p><font color="#666666"><span style="line-height: 17px; font-size: 14px;"><p><br>13. Bags worn over the shoulder will only be black or the color print of the uniform i.e. ACU, without logos.<br><br>14. the new regulation will specify civilian clothes standards both on and off duty and both on and off post.<br><br>15. No visible body piercings on or off duty and on or off post, males will never be allowed to wear earrings. Ear gauging will be unauthorized.<br><br>16. No dental ornamentation or gold teeth will be authorized.<br><br>17. Soldiers will be authorized to wear authorized ballistic eye wear in garrison.<br><br>18. Officers will be authorized to wear non-subdued rank on their headgear in garrison.<br><br>19. Males will be authorized to carry black umbrella with ASU.</p><p><br></p><p>http://www.armytimes.com/article/20140307/NEWS07/303070021/Army-secretary-approves-new-grooming-uniform-regs<br></p></span></font><div class="pta-link-card"><div class="pta-link-card-picture"><img src="http://www.armytimes.com/graphics/ody/alticon.png"></div><div class="pta-link-card-content"><div class="pta-link-card-title"><a href="http://www.armytimes.com/article/20140307/NEWS07/303070021/Army-secretary-approves-new-grooming-uniform-regs" target="_blank">Army secretary approves new grooming, uniform regs</a></div><div class="pta-link-card-description">
Army Secretary John McHugh on Thursday approved a long-awaited revision to grooming and uniform regulations, according to an Army statement.
</div></div><div style="clear: both;"></div><div class="pta-box-hide"><i class="icon-remove"></i></div></div>
Posted in these groups: Professionalism logo ProfessionalismRules and regulations Regulation
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 184
Cpl Ray Fernandez
1
1
0
Reminds me of the Marine regs when I was in.

(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Salvador Ricardo Jimenez
1
1
0
No commercially pressed ACUs? First of all, many units require their troops to starch their ACUs which are not supposed to be starched. The starch clogs their pores which the pores allow the troops to perspire and/or ventilate easier. New off duty & especially off post appearance standards? What necessary improvements are these going to bring or are they simply powertrips? Some of these new standards make me that much more grateful that I no longer serve in our over polished dog & pony show military. I'm nobody's pet! BUT, I still support our troops! CHRIST BLESS OUR MILITARY ALWAYS!
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Brigade Security Manager
1
1
0
Great read so far can't wait to read the all changes.

(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
>1 y
Roger that 1SG, I am retiring this year and I tell you it get more interesting each year with the Army.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPL Jay Strickland
1
1
0
I think the must be clean shaven rule during leave is a bit much. Xmas and growing a beard was something I looked forward to every year. I could understand on base and off duty. 
(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
>1 y
Couldn't agree more everyone needs a little relaxation on leave.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Hrnco
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
double posted....
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Hrnco
1
1
0
2. New revision of the regulation will define the following terms: eccentric, faddish,conservative, inconspicuous, unsightly, hair braids/plaits....
- Good, because faddish is speculative to where you are from, where you live and how old you are.

3. AR 670-1 will be a PUNITIVE order in the new regulation.
- Ok

4. Sideburns will not extend below the top of the ear.
-Not everyone looks good bald or with a tiny strip of hair. I am told my many civilians that it looks like many male soldiers put a feminine pad on their head and shaved around it.

5. Soldiers will be clean shaven on AND off duty (even during leave).
-REALLY??? If I do not let my face go unshaven once in a while it will break out and my skin will start cracking. Are we supposed to look like warriors or daycare teachers? Who is going to punish me for not shaving on my family vacation to Disney world? Who is going to punish me for not shaving on Saturday when I am at Wal-Mart. This is ludicrous.

6. Female and Male hair grooming standards will become more restrictive and better defined(I'll have pictures for you at MHS).
- Sounds fun

7. Females will be allowed to put their hair into a pony tail during PT.
-Good

8. Males will be prohibited from wearing cosmetics to include nail polish, females may wear cosmetics conservatively, but can only wear nail polish in service, mess, or dress uniforms.
-Ok

9. Females fingernail length will not exceed 1/4 inch, no fake nails, add-ons, or extensions will be authorized.
- Sure
10. Tattoos will not be visible above the neck line when the IPFU is worn. Tattoos will not extend below the wrist line and not on the hands. Sleeve tattoos will be prohibited (this one will be grandfathered).
-Good luck with this. Tattoos are a military tradition since before the Spartan days. once again warrior or daycare teacher.

11. Soldiers will not walk while engaged in activities that require the hand salute (eating, cell phone use, smoking, etc.).
-Isn't that already a standard?

12. ACUs will not be commercially pressed; hand ironing of the ACU only will be authorized.
-ok


13. Bags worn over the shoulder will only be black or the color print of the uniform i.e. ACU, without logos.
- wow....ok I guess. I have a grey laptop bag. Guess I have to fork out more money for Uncle Sam?

14. the new regulation will specify civilian clothes standards both on and off duty and both on and off post.
- Wow... Are you going to buy my clothes for me too? How about you just move some guy INTO my house to tell me how to breathe at this point.

15. No visible body piercings on or off duty and on or off post, males will never be allowed to wear earrings. Ear gauging will be unauthorized.
- Ok. Sucks for the guys with earrings but it is livable.

16. No dental ornamentation or gold teeth will be authorized.
-Tell that to the 54 year old MSG I had in my last unit.

17. Soldiers will be authorized to wear authorized ballistic eye wear in garrison.
- I agree

18. Officers will be authorized to wear non-subdued rank on their headgear in garrison.
-Good

19. Males will be authorized to carry black umbrella with ASU.
- ok...I never knew this was an issue.

If you can tell I am a satirical/sarcastic type writer and mean no disrespect ot those above me. Down the road my generation and those after me will be in charge and the silly dog and pony shows will HOPEFULLY go away. We are WARRIORS not daycare teachers. Look at the pictures (or paintings) of Soldiers from the beginning of the US to now. Each generation basically looks like what the leader’s generation of professionalism is. The standards will change every 20 years but some of these are just silly. What is SO unprofessional about not shaving on Saturday? What is SO bad about sideburns?
Yes if a Soldier looks SLOPPY they automatically lose report. But if they have a sleeve tattoo and sideburns I do not blink twice. I weigh their worth as a Soldier on how they live the army values and apply the NCO Creed (if they are an NCO) to their daily duties and life.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Senior Paralegal Nco
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Regardless of how you feel personally about the changes to the regulation, hopefully as a Staff Sergeant you will set the example for your Soldiers and not show disdain toward the policy.  There are plenty of things people do not agree with, but as NCOs we need to set the example and set our personal feelings aside.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Hrnco
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
I completely agree. As an NCO I will enforce whichever standard is set. However, the only way things will change is to propose change with a tactful and respectable approach. I have always been taught; if you wish to change something you must first become a part of it. In my opinion, being asked to shave off duty is discrimination (but I will enforce it because it is not illegal or truly immoral). Do females also have to wear their hair up off duty? This was the remark a female (former Drill Sergeant) MSG in my unit gave when reading the off duty shaving proposal. Off-duty civilian clothing regulation also sounds like it is a good step in the direction of communism. I will continue upholding the standard and enforcing the regulation as long as they do not step into the direction of immoral. The Nazi Soldier’s in WWII were just following orders too. Now there is a huge difference in enforcing a uniform regulation and exterminating an entire race. I am simply saying, I will enforce the rules, no matter how silly, until they step over that line. I believe as American’s and NCO’s we both know where that line is. Sometimes, even our leaders need to be reminded what is important, what is right/wrong etc.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Fire Support Specialist
1
1
0
This sounds EXACTLY like the Army I joined in 1998 and served in until 2003 when the wars started. We need to realize that the "changes" being made to AR 670-1 are simply "re-tightening" of the loosened standards from the wars. These standards ARE the standard, WERE the standard prior to 2003 and honestly never should have stopped being the standard. DA in it's need for personnel during the wars relaxed the regulations and allowed certin waivers that were prohibited before 2003. This accomplished the goal of reaching recruiting and retention goals that actually met the demand for personnel that the wars forced upon us with the authorization for additional troops in the early stages of the wars. DA is now downsizing due to the wars ending and not needing those extra troop numbers any longer. With that downsizing comes the tightening of those standards that were loosened (tatoos, body fat etc) and the denial of some of those waivers that were allowed during the wars. So again, not really a change so much as taking a step back in time.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Ssa Ncoic
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
The civilian clothes changes, although tricky to enforce off installation, will help move us to being percieved as professionals. The proposed tattoo changes are a little more extreme. I am a fan of the old regulation of nothing that can be seen while in the dress uniform (no hands or above the collar).
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
>1 y
I agree, its all about the total perception of professionalism. Tattoo policy will be hard to enforce and will not make to big of a impact, but UCMJ, if someone violates it in the mean time. Too many changes creates more questions good and bad in my opinion.  
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT 94 E Radio Comsec Repairer
1
1
0
SFC Davis,

I'm in agreement with all of the new rules, but my favorite is number 12, hand ironing of the ACUs.  We'll look more professional if we're allowed to iron out wrinkles.

On a side note, it's interesting that certain soldiers think the new standards are too strict, while in the past it's been stated that we young soldiers don't take enough pride in our appearance, the way they did in the "old Army."  
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Evacuation Ncoic
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
Ironing of the ACU was never unauthorized.

here is a link to the ALARACT concerning the wear of the ACU



(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT 94 E Radio Comsec Repairer
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y

SGT Gathany,

 

CAM PAM 600-1, the Fort Campbell Blue Book states, "The ACU is a wash and wear, no iron - no starch uniform. Soldiers will not iron or starch the ACU."

(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
>1 y
Just like the old saying goes, can add but not take away from the Regulation
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Rifleman
1
1
0
Some of these already exist...
e.g. 5, 11, 15, etc.

(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David Greth
1
1
0
Completely disagree with #5 and #14.  Would like to see more detail on #14.  Reference #12 I remember we were not supposed to have our BDUs commercially pressed and NO starch.  Yeah right.  That was the only way not to get busted out on the uniform.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close