Posted on Mar 7, 2014
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
37
37
0
<14px;">, APPROVED, AND PUBLISHED!<br><br>2. New revision of the regulation will define the following terms: eccentric, faddish,conservative, inconspicuous, unsightly, hair braids/plaits.<br><br>3. AR 670-1 will be a PUNITIVE order in the new regulation. &nbsp;<br><br>4. Sideburns will not extend below the top of the ear. &nbsp;<br><br>5. Soldiers will be clean shaven on AND off duty (even during leave).<br><br>6. Female and Male hair grooming standards will become more restrictive and better defined(I'll have pictures for you at MHS).<br><br>7. Females will be allowed to put their hair into a pony tail during PT.<br><br>8. Males will be prohibited from wearing cosmetics to include nail polish, females may wear cosmetics conservatively, but can only wear nail polish in service, mess, or dress uniforms.<br><br>9. Females fingernail length will not exceed 1/4 inch, no fake nails, add-ons, or extensions will be authorized.<br><br>10. Tattoos will not be visible above the neck line when the IPFU is worn. Tattoos will not extend below the wrist line and not on the hands. Sleeve tattoos will be prohibited (this one will be grandfathered).<br><br>11. Soldiers will not walk while engaged in activities that require the hand salute (eating, cell phone use, smoking, etc.).<br><br>12. ACUs will not be commercially pressed; hand ironing of the ACU only will be authorized.</span></font></p><font color="#666666"><span style="line-height: 17px; font-size: 14px;"><p><br>13. Bags worn over the shoulder will only be black or the color print of the uniform i.e. ACU, without logos.<br><br>14. the new regulation will specify civilian clothes standards both on and off duty and both on and off post.<br><br>15. No visible body piercings on or off duty and on or off post, males will never be allowed to wear earrings. Ear gauging will be unauthorized.<br><br>16. No dental ornamentation or gold teeth will be authorized.<br><br>17. Soldiers will be authorized to wear authorized ballistic eye wear in garrison.<br><br>18. Officers will be authorized to wear non-subdued rank on their headgear in garrison.<br><br>19. Males will be authorized to carry black umbrella with ASU.</p><p><br></p><p>http://www.armytimes.com/article/20140307/NEWS07/303070021/Army-secretary-approves-new-grooming-uniform-regs<br></p></span></font><div class="pta-link-card"><div class="pta-link-card-picture"><img src="http://www.armytimes.com/graphics/ody/alticon.png"></div><div class="pta-link-card-content"><div class="pta-link-card-title"><a href="http://www.armytimes.com/article/20140307/NEWS07/303070021/Army-secretary-approves-new-grooming-uniform-regs" target="_blank">Army secretary approves new grooming, uniform regs</a></div><div class="pta-link-card-description">
Army Secretary John McHugh on Thursday approved a long-awaited revision to grooming and uniform regulations, according to an Army statement.
</div></div><div style="clear: both;"></div><div class="pta-box-hide"><i class="icon-remove"></i></div></div>
Posted in these groups: Professionalism logo ProfessionalismRules and regulations Regulation
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 184
SFC Psychological Operations Specialist
3
3
0


I for one think some of these should have been covered a
long time ago. I remember not being allowed to wear certain types of clothes (i.e.
tank tops and flip flops just to name a few) on post during the first five or
so years of my 21 years. I can’t tell you how many times I wanted to tell
someone (soldier and civilian) to go change while I was in the PX or anywhere
on post for that matter. I have never understood what happened to the dress
codes from my early years.



(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PV2 Christopher Graham
4
3
1

Once again, the higher-ups have failed to grasp the concept of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Clean shaven? I'm old-school Army and moustaches had their own regs. Males authorized a black umbrella? My Drill SGT taught me, "If it ain't rainin', we ain't trainin'. If it ain't snowin', we ain't goin!" Has MY Army become so sissified that a little rain is gonna melt the average soldier? What if it starts raining while the bullets are flying? Are you going to drop you M-4, don your umbrella, and wait for fair weather? If Mr. I. Hate Americans doesn't die laughing, he'll turn you into swiss cheese. And even if I were still in, I'd love to see somebody come tell me, while off-post, what I can & cannot wear. I had no trouble telling officers off when I was in, and I laugh at, and will laugh in the face of whomever thought this up. Sounds like a shave-tail lieuiy to me. There's a reason why butter bars aren't really put in charge of anything; they don't know their job yet.

P.S. even telling offices off, I STILL have an Honorable Discharge.

(4)
Comment
(1)
SPC Brendan Kearns
SPC Brendan Kearns
>1 y
Males will be authorized to carry black umbrella with ASU. Nobody suggested carrying one around in the field with your kit and an M4 
(2)
Reply
(0)
SSG Aircraft Powertrain Repairer
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
How are you a PV2 and old school Army???
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG (ret) William Martin
SSG (ret) William Martin
>1 y
MR. Graham, Do you even umbrella?  I am calling you "MR" because you status says "V".  Really though, I won't mine protecting my ASUs which I have taken hard work to get ready for any reason.  Some of the new rules in reference to appearance has to do with garrison stuff.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ Commander
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
Heading to South Carolina for a week of leave.  See if you can find me and inspect my whiskers.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Liason Officer To Polish Land Forces
3
3
0

Whether my bag is OD Green, ACU, ACU Green, or Black, does not subtract from my professionalism.

 

The not being able to walk with the phone in use is just nuts. Maybe even add in if it is business related and you are conducting yourself accordingly. I can save a lot of time if I can call enroute to a destination in order to coordinate training. Now your are telling me I have to stop to have a 30 sec conversation and waste time and not to mention the time of everyone around me or anyone waiting on me at the destination.

 

What is the point of making an un-enforceable regulation ie clean shaven 24/7 on or off duty. There will be no more leave because in order to go, you will have to take at least an E-6 with you to make sure you are shaving. Don't worry Army retirees, the Army will pay you to be a Wal-Mart Greeter so you can look for people who look remotely military on Sunday morning and ask if they shaved.

 

I wholeheartedly agree that whether in or out of uniform, you are still a soldier. Ecessively odd modes of dress do make the Army as a whole look unprofessional, but don't tell me I have to wear business casual at all times on post. If a soldier needs to put down the razor for a day or two when not on duty, that is much better than wasting our medical services time and government's money by getting a shaving profile.

 

I am ranting, but it stands to reason that there is a better use of our tax dollars than thinking up ways to make our haircuts tighter, our off duty clothes match, and that we are shaven at all times. We have standards now, make sure people live up to them.

 

(3)
Comment
(0)
SGT(P) Wardmaster   Intensive Care Unit Platoon   68 C20   Licensed Vocational Nurse
SGT(P) (Join to see)
>1 y
Been in since 2004 and it has always been against the rules to walk and talk on your cell phone.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CSM Mike Maynard
CSM Mike Maynard
>1 y
The comments "NEVER been able to walk and talk" and "always been against the rules" are comments generated by local experiences.

It has never been against Army Regulation to talk on phone, eat, smoke while walking.

It has only been against local policy (post, unit) for these restrictions.

It is only with the updated AR 670-1 that it actually specifies those things are prohibited.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Health I.T. (Hit) Systems Security Engineer
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
@ 2LT Zachary Shearin, I could not agree more when you stated, "The not being able to walk with the phone in use is just nuts. Maybe even add in if it is business related and you are conducting yourself accordingly...."

My BDE CSM 'caught' me doing this in the motor-pool once...and had a flip-out moment. Never saw someone so angry and unwilling to listen to me. He was in such a rant and rage that he took the phone out of my hand and told the other person on the phone to call back later without even knowing or caring who was on the line with me; and hung up.

He later got the same from the COL when he personally showed up in our motor-pool as I was still doing mountain climbers, push-ups, side-straddle hops, ...basically being totally dogged out. When the COL asked him why he hung up on him... he was dumb-founded.

A short jump to conclusions never helps anyone. I understand if that was a girlfriend or something... but that was business... I was the Brigade's Unit Movement 'Officer' and the Col wanted his status report (more on his personal equipment and hummer, etc.) for the BDE which was being deployed.

Was not funny at the time... but it is now. The CSM never apologized for smoking me.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Health I.T. (Hit) Systems Security Engineer
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Reason for my walking and talking... I had to walk from the motor-pool mechanics' building down the 600 meters to the Colonel's vehicle to check on its' status when I was 'caught'.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Ernest Davis
3
3
0
Mike headshot
SO glad I am out ;) 
(3)
Comment
(0)
1SG Ernest Davis
1SG Ernest Davis
>1 y
although - this pic was while on AD ;) lol




(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
>1 y
I am on my way towards civilization, thanks for your Service
(3)
Reply
(0)
SSG (ret) William Martin
SSG (ret) William Martin
>1 y
I love the hat 1SG.  I have one just like it! 
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG(P) Detailed Recruiter
3
3
0
Edited 12 y ago
I like the fact that they are getting more in the females for the nails. Some are getting out of control, especially around the TRADOC environment. You see them with all kinds of colors, long nails and designs. Now, we as leaders, have to have intestinal fortitude to stop and correct what we see and police up our own. Favoritism ain't going to takes us no where. Civilian clothing appearance should be regulated too, but also and big on males. If you want to wear sagging pants and show your three pairs of shorts underneath you oversize jeans and over your boxers, get out of the Army and do it. We have standards, they must be followed. I'm all about blending in with the rest of the civilian population, but look ridiculous and look like a fool walking holding your pants up it's just not the way. Males need to be police up, but to a point. 
Shaving while on leave or off? A little too much. I don't agree with this one. Shaving to just go to the store? I used to do it when I lived on post in Ft Riley, just because  I didn't wanted to get someone to stop and start asking what's your unit, 1SG etc. I just stayed in my house and go off post if I needed to leave. Also, the skin needs a break from razors once a while. I know a lot of people wouldn't agree with me on this, but hey that's what opinions are for.
Other one I'm hesitant to agree is tattoos. If you allowed them to get in with them, why now want to get rid of them? The PVT's and the SGT's of 09/11/2001 are the SFC's and CSM's of now. They had the tattoos then, why are getting judged now.
(3)
Comment
(0)
CPT Battery Commander
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
Excellent points you've made. I think that provided someone is dressed appropriately according to acceptable social norms, then it should be ok. Someone holding their pants up while walking to prevent them from falling down would stand out to nearly anyone. This is a matter of social standards of acceptable dress, not just an army perspective. If it's not socially acceptable, then it shouldn't be acceptable to the army either
(4)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Senior Warrior Liaison
3
3
0
So this is what the garrison army is like. Well, its a good thing im bald so i dont have to worry about making sure my side burns arent too long....
(3)
Comment
(0)
SGT Cda 564, Assistant Team Sergeant
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
According to the "leaked" training directive slides the side burn regulation has not changed. It still says the LOWEST opening of the ear and even has a picture and an arrow pointing to the lowest opening of your ear. It does address thickness as 1/8 of an inch but length = no change.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Humint Technician
3
3
0
Frankly I'm just sick of all the talk about it and leaders trying to enforce phantom regs based on a DRAFT pub. Still waiting to see the final product. 
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
12 y
That's the truth..lol
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Senior Paralegal Nco
3
3
0
I have a couple questions in regard to the new standards that I hope will be cleared up once AR 670-1 is actually published, and I hope these will not be taken the wrong way.  Also I am in no way trying to pick on female Soldiers...just looking for fairness across the board.

1. One of the new changes is the "Soldiers" will be clean shaven both on and off duty.  Since the term being used is Soldiers, will this include both male and female.  I am not trying to be funny, but I have seen some female Soldiers with mustaches or hair growing on their chin, etc.  The previous version never addressed females needing to shave.

2.  Since males are being told to always keep their hair a certain way, i.e. no sideburns at all times, will females be required to keep their hair up at all times.  It states that hair standards will be more restrictive for both males and females but no details are provided.  I guess time we will all know the answer in a couple weeks.
(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Hrnco
SFC (Join to see)
12 y
Agreed.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
12 y
Roger that good point, its all about transparency going forward on the gender. I think SMA needs to make shaving across the board.
(4)
Reply
(0)
SSG General Services Technician And State Vehicle Inspector
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SFC Toupe, great points. I mentioned the same thing in my comment regarding your second point. I see it as a double standard if males have to shave every day, even on leave or weekends, but females can "let their hair down" not only during the same timeframes but also at night. It's definitely not anything against females but, like you articulated, it's about the same standards.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CW4 Retired
3
3
0
I may or may not agree with all or some of these changes, but I will add this. We are a Professional Army, and if you understand what professionals do, say, and look like you might begin to understand why these changes were put in place or have been brought up. remember Profession of Arms.  http://cape.army.mil/repository/ProArms/ProfessionWhite%20Paper%208%20Dec%2010.pdf


(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
12 y
Thanks for the perspective Sir.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Aircrew Controller Ii
3
3
0

#3.  Isn't "Failure to obey a Lawful Order or General Regulation" punitive under the UCMJ already?  Am I missing something here?


#4.  I sure hope the "Top of the Ear" is clearly defined in the signed version.


#5.  On leave? How are you going to enforce that? Shaving police travelling around to everyone's leave address to ensure they are remaining clean shaven? I know, integrity comes into play here, but really?  I mean I pretty much stayed clean shaven on leave because I couldn't grow a beard to save my life and after about the 6th year in it drove me crazy to not shave at least every other day while on leave.  Almost 3 years retired and I still can't stand it when my hair gets to long.


#14.  I think the off duty, off post may be going a little to the extreme.


Just an Airman's two cents!

(3)
Comment
(0)
SFC Glenn Burkhard
SFC Glenn Burkhard
12 y

Sounds like a lot of TDY to check on your soldiers on leave


(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Senior Paralegal Nco
SFC (Join to see)
12 y
All regulations are not punitive.  Yes Article 92 states failure to obey order or regulation, but the regulation must state that it is punitive.  An example is the EO policy in AR 600-20.  It states that violations may be punished.  If it does not state that, you cannot charge it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
12 y
At Hood, we used to have III Corp Courteous  Patrol, its coming back to Big Army everywhere with Senior Leaders at the PX checking.
(3)
Reply
(0)
CPT Battery Commander
CPT (Join to see)
>1 y
Does anyone else see something wrong with a senior Nco spending time away from his duties to do this? I'm sure there are much more mission critical tasks to be completed.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close