Posted on Oct 31, 2015
Are you more likely to be alive today if you saw combat in the gulf, vs those who did not?
4.07K
0
3
0
0
0
http://www.viewzone2.com/gulfwar.deaths.pdf
I did a little number crunching, and the results might surprise you.
COMBAT VET SURVIVAL RATE: 89%
THEATER VET SURVIVAL RATE: 79%
DEPLOYED VET SURVIVAL RATE: 85%
NON-DEPLOYED SURVIVAL RATE: 62%
If you served during the gulf war, but did not deploy - you are FOUR TIMES more likely to be dead right now than someone who saw combat. (This number includes those who died in combat too!)
Any thoughts on why this statistical anomaly is happening?
http://www.midtod.com/9710/gulfwar.phtml
I did a little number crunching, and the results might surprise you.
COMBAT VET SURVIVAL RATE: 89%
THEATER VET SURVIVAL RATE: 79%
DEPLOYED VET SURVIVAL RATE: 85%
NON-DEPLOYED SURVIVAL RATE: 62%
If you served during the gulf war, but did not deploy - you are FOUR TIMES more likely to be dead right now than someone who saw combat. (This number includes those who died in combat too!)
Any thoughts on why this statistical anomaly is happening?
http://www.midtod.com/9710/gulfwar.phtml
Operation Desert Shield/Storm
Chemicals
Medical
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 3
0
0
0
Yea, has there been anything newer than 1997 published? That is kind of old.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
ÞñkzòWðÌèóXè(ìðM2§nK8\\t-ÃZ#¡Â,xfmÏÆêGºÆsüÍ:qdhNÆAWfÖå«a!Ï#{tÛ?ÐHlr PÂÆÆƪÅÅÂ`KË)æ ÈÀTÌÍfLÅÅ&$Î((s2B# L ÂhNgAØA~ö ÉÀÇ EØl ÃM dÐa8ÃXÄÁ9hùeÆ[Wúº3ø3Lbb}váPÃ,#n^1gôf8ÏÂàÁ`·Bß23X3LÁà T$uØ=UÃõ+çøðNbèaøÃèÎ0æ=ÐN8 0 Ýendstreamendobj185 0 obj756 endobj164 0 obj> /Contents 172 0 R /CropBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] >> endobj165 0 obj> endobj166 0 obj> endobj167 0 obj> endobj168 0 obj> endobj169 0 obj> endobj170 0 obj>...
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Perhaps the last category includes those who were more senior hence older?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google