Aside from the Second Amendment, what are the logically and evidence-supported arguments for uninfringed firearm possession?

The bottom line, MAJ Bryan Zeski, is to make money by selling more guns.

Gun sales were at a peak during the Obama years. Now, profits are dropping.

In the colonial days, we didn't have the police forces (city, state, federal... and those agencies in between). Hence, the need for armed militias.

I like to hunt and would keep a weapon for recreational (and free food) purposes. To date, never needed for protection — especially with armed security in our building.

A buddy owns dozens of guns and still goes shopping for more. His right to do so.

The only true argument is to protect yourself and your loved ones from those that could care less about following the laws and from those entitled elites that are above the laws and have forgotten their oaths. In the end when you place your well being into the hands of flawed human beings you take your chances.

It a money making thing.