Posted on Aug 5, 2014
SSG Robin Rushlo
67.8K
1.08K
565
44
44
0
Atheists want guard to stop bible handouts what is your opinion
If you do not believe in the BIBLE GOD JESUS etc do not take the BIBLE. Easy answer

http://www.military.com/daily-news/2014/08/05/atheists-want-guard-to-stop-bible-handouts.html?ESRC=eb.nl
Posted in these groups: Atheism symbol Atheism
Avatar feed
Responses: 186
PO1 Ron Clark
1
1
0
Each individual has the opportunity to practice or not practice whatever religion which is their faith! Atheist do not have the right to dictate to anyone who wish to receive a Bible from whomever.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Team Leader
1
1
0
If the atheists don't want a Bible, then they don't have to take one.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Gregory Reilly
1
1
0
As long as it's not being forced on a soldier there's nothing wrong with offering it. If you want it, it should be made available. If you don't want it, don't take it. Isn't there a freedom of religion clause somewhere in our constitution? It's your CHOICE. Next thing they'll want to do is eliminate the Chaplain Corp. Makes you wonder if these knuckleheads ever served. I don't practice my religion as I should but I've never been without a bible. It's a comfort thing. How many soldiers have comforted by the clergy over the years. LEAVE IT ALONE!!!
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Practical/Vocational Nursing
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
To do that, it is required to open up the distribution of literature to every group wishing to distribute its material. It is impermissible to establish favoritism for one particular belief by only allowing one particular belief system access. Viewpoint discrimination, by the gov't, has been ruled against by the courts on several occasions.

Additionally, depending on how the literature is made available. If passively, then it eliminates a coercion effect. If actively handed out by a higher ranking person, it potentially lends to a coercive atmosphere where a person feels required to take the material, whether or not he/she agrees with it.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Pharmacy Technician
1
1
0
I see a lot of great points and I do notice most atheist do try and debate you why you believe in God, it's like I don't debate you on why you don't. Which does seem a bit aggressive, but the proper thing to do is just say no thank you no explanation needed of why your decline, just a simple no thank you....
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Philip Evans
1
1
0
I would like to pass on a very good question for everyone to think about. What roll does the Atheist play in the history of America? Where do they fit in historically? I am attaching an article that was posted on GodFather Politics.com for ThanksGiving that looks at the actual history of the proclamation of Thanksgiving Day and Atheism. It is something that each of us should think about and consider in our evaluation of American History and Civic Responsibilities.

Re. Phil



You Can’t Be an American and be an Atheist

Posted on GodfatherPolitics.com by on November 27th by Gary DeMar

The folks at the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) want to rid the country of every vestige of religion from every facet of society and make the nation officially atheistic. They contend that the Constitution requires it based on a tortured reading of the First Amendment and a rewriting of our nation’s history.You don’t have to have a PhD in history to know that not one of our founders would have supported the exploits of the FFRF and Americans United for Separation of Church and State for the simple reason that history is against them.
Of course, atheists are Americans because they were born or have become citizens in accordance with specific constitutional requirements.

But in terms of how our founders understood what it meant to be an American, and the role they believed that God played in its founding, they are fundamentally un-American.
As singular proof of this claim is President George Washington’s 1789 “Thanksgiving Proclamation,” which was issued soon after the passage of the Bill of Rights which included the First Amendment which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; . . .”
If there had been a FFRF in 1789, Dan Barker, co-president of the FFRF, would have sued the President and Congress. Of course, the men who drafted the First Amendment would have been called as witnesses and would have testified that separating God from government, and that religion was ever an impediment to the development of science, was never the intention of the First Amendment.
Note the first line of the Proclamation and other references to God.

Issued by President George Washington, at the request of Congress, on October 3, 1789. By the President of the United States of America, a Proclamation.

Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor; and—Whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me “to recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness:”

Now, therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th day of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favor, able interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been enabled to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted; for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations, and beseech Him to pardon our national and other trangressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us), and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally, to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.

Given under my hand at the City of New York the third day of October in the year of our Lord 1789.
Go. Washington
(1)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Christopher Bishop
Cpl Christopher Bishop
>1 y
I have a few thoughts. First, I will state that I am Agnostic, which in my opinion gets blended in with the Atheists too often. That said, I will attempt to clarify what Agnostic means to me. It means I neither believe/disbelieve in any form of higher power, and that while I am open to such possibilities, I am relatively unconcerned. While this may shock you, I’d suggest the folks who do cling to a religion yet fail to follow its rules obviously aren't all that concerned, either.

That said...I do believe that rather simple things can work out rather well. Having an IQ far above room-temperature which provides me with simple observational skills means that I ought to be able to figure out how I should conduct myself within my society without the need to attach my life to a book. I do not use my imperfections as excuse for failure, as there is a big difference between an explanation, and a justification. I choose to align myself with the lesson of “Do unto others…” because it is practical, not because it will get myself a ticket past the “Pearly Gates.” And while I claim no particular religion, I sleep well knowing that I have very little hypocrisy within my own life, or skeletons within my own closets, and I never have to worry about others asking me why I would continue to follow religious leaders who have proven that even they---they whom have likely spent the bulk of their lives mastering verses---fail to follow their own self-appointed rule-sets (clergy pedophiles---what religion hasn't had them?). I rather enjoy not having to apologize on Sundays for the past 6 days of whatever random sins I may have committed, while knowing I’m going to go do the same things again the following week.

Some say religions are tools (by governments?) to invoke certain “proper” behaviors. I will likely remain Agnostic unless/until there is one that can actually demonstrate it works. In the meantime, I will continue to coincidentally follow most of the Christians’ “rules” better than most who claim the faith. If in fact the soul lives forever, and we all keep being reincarnated to another life on earth until we finally grasp some particular lesson, I am ok with that idea of being here again. If I was not, I might be suicidal now…and I am far from it.

I will leave you with a bit of humor…they used to say “There are never any Atheists in foxholes.” When I first stumbled upon that, I had two thoughts. First, the bit about Christians blending in Agnostics with Atheists, and then secondly my response: “Well, then it pleases me to be the first.”

In some summary, I do not believe its the role of the military to be passing out these things. And while I'm not a Muslim or in any way affiliated with Islam ... I have to point out that it seems odd to me that social media which would scorn certain folks from having sex with goats...are some of the same people who follow leaders of different religions who do the same with human children. Perhaps there should be a new bumper sticker ... "If you (men) were dumb enough to piss off your woman, then you get a goat, not a child."

Semper Fi.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPO William Hughes
CPO William Hughes
9 y
This is rubbish! I wouldn't expect more from an overtly religious organization called "GodFather.Com" I mean, come on, why don't you just quote from the Holy Mother Church and be done with it? I wear my atheism proudly and I'll be forever grateful that I was finally able to shed the cloak of religion in favor of reason, truth and the scientific principle. I stand on the shoulders of giants going far, far back in time. Epicuris, an ancient Greek philosopher is a great example. Look up his teachings, you might learn something. Thomas Paine, who is credited with inspiring these United States to initiate the Revolution against the tyranny of King George by writing the periodical "Common Sense", was an atheist. Pick up a copy of his book "Age of Reason' and you might gain a little insight. There have been atheists since the first religion was formed. We don't advocate banning religion, just keep it in it's place. Private conversations between you and your Sky-god. Keep it away from my childre and keep it away from my door.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SrA Aircraft Hydraulic Systems
1
1
0
I have no religious affiliation so your proposed option of just not taking it makes sense to me. A simple no thank you doesn't hurt. This is a very sensitive topic so to avoid drama or a heated debate I usually keep anything extra to myself and respectfully decline their offer. To each his own.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Practical/Vocational Nursing
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
It becomes an issue if only one group is permitted to distribute their literature. If that is the case, then it is against existing court rulings for governmental agencies.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Assistant Operations Officer (S3)
1
1
0
Edited >1 y ago
I believe that the services should continue to offer materials for the various religions. My chaplain had a stack of Bibles, Holy Books, Torah Books, and Qurans on a desk outside of his office. The conventional books that are available are not a size that is compatible with travel. Also, many of these books are provided by outside organizations, from what I have seen. The books commonly have a bit in the front saying that it was provided by xxxxxx for the military.

If you don't want a specific book, or any, then don't take one. My leadership has done a pretty good job providing opportunities to obtain material for self-study for religious freedom. The only issue I have encountered is being able to get off to go to participate in holy days. The best about that was TRADOC at FLW for CBOLC. The worst was Knox working for Cadet Command - offering no resources or materials. My current assignment helps get information and materials, but is not so helpful for getting me to be able to go worship.

Overall, I'm happy with the status of the current Army policies. They could be better, but they could be a lot worse, too.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTJG Robert M.
1
1
0
I am always amazed that a group of individuals will expend extraordinary time & efforts to stop something, they say doesn't exist.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CPO William Hughes
CPO William Hughes
9 y
LtJG, I'm surprised that a person of your rank, which implies that you must have graduated from an institute of higher education, could be so easily confused! Let me clarify. How can an atheist believe in something they don't believe in? Sound like a conundrum? Yes, it is. We don't believe in "stopping god". We belive in keeping your gods out of the public arena and in the closet where you should be conversing with him (her, it). Let me quote probably the most articulate man I have ever heard, the late Christopher Hitchens; "An early objection I had with christianity at school was being told I was part of a flock. Shepherds don't just look after sheep because they like them. They either want to fleece them, fuck them or eat them."
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTJG Robert M.
LTJG Robert M.
9 y
Wow Chief, may I assume from your comment you are a self-proclaimed atheist? I wish to thank you for you have proven my point.

Your comment also saddens me, I am willing to wager that somewhere in your past you had a negative personal experience that caused you to lash out against God. I pray someday that wound heals.

I also believe that there is a vast difference between what “Religion” tells you and my personal walk as a Christian and God Believer in this world.

Have a Blessed Day.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Brad Sand
1
1
0
If you are truly Atheists, why would you care? As Shakespeare so aptly put it, 'Thy doth protest too much.'
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Practical/Vocational Nursing
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
While you are correct that the Establishment Clause prohibits the gov't from establishing a state religion, you are mistaken in its limits. The Establishment Clause also prohibits the government from favoring any particular religion, as it has been ruled on in various federal court cases, with substantiation of the favor received when only one belief system is receiving preference. This has been ruled to create a de facto preference for that particular belief, in violation of the Establishment Clause.

In this case, if only one religious group has access to distribute their religious books, while prohibiting the distribution of other literature, it would be establishing a de facto preference for that one belief - whatever it may be. The same would be true if an atheist group were handing out literature, on gov't property, stating "there is no god," while prohibiting a religious groups alternative literature.

It is not just for the prohibition on creating a state religion. I would suggest you read up further on this issue, as the court cases stand on their merits. The various cases will expand your understanding of the limitations of the Establishment Clause.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
>1 y
SSG (Join to see)

I will agree that a misinformed public will allow Federal Judges to over step their positions and create Unconstitutional rulings that others will use to abuse the Establishment Clause...but that does not change what the clause says.

My problem is I think what the Constitution and the Bill of Rights does say, is important.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Practical/Vocational Nursing
SSG (Join to see)
>1 y
MSG Brad Sand, then you are stating that the Supreme Court has overstepped their positions, and stated that the SCOTUS has created unConstitutional rulings in their decision of what violates the Establishment Clause, and is therefore unconstitutional.

Your problem is that you think you know better what the Constitution states, and means, than the US Supreme Court.

Please let us know where to have the SCOTUS contact you to correct them on their obvious errors. /sarcasm
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
>1 y
Daron,

Read the document. It is not hard.

The American people have allowed the foolishness to grow to the point where bright people like you can actually believe what you are posting.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Retired
1
1
0
Atheists have the same opportunity to create literature to be pased out to Soldiers. Soldiers who are Atheists can accept them and those who are not can refuse them just like any other literature.
(1)
Comment
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
>1 y
MSG (Join to see)

That would be cool if Atheists were handing out their literature, I could use some more blank note books!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close