Posted on Jul 25, 2016
Both parties are in chaos. Can this be explained with my regression analysis: D = socialist; R = independent?
Suspended Profile
5.01K
53
59
If you push dems far enough, they'll stick together due to a socialist leaning. That is ironic because Bernie got to "share the wealth" with the uber rich Clintons.
If you push repubs far enough, they'll go cowboy due to libertarian leanings. Repubs got tired of their party not listening and fighting back, now their candidates are all fighting.
Is that a fair regression and assessment?
If you push repubs far enough, they'll go cowboy due to libertarian leanings. Repubs got tired of their party not listening and fighting back, now their candidates are all fighting.
Is that a fair regression and assessment?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 14
We can play that game Sir, If Kennedy were alive today he would be Republican. The DEMs today are far left of 6 o clock and the right are at about 4PM the whole model is slowly sliding to give me free shit and I'll vote for you. How do you boil a frog, turn the heat up very slowly....1st action to insure Socialism is public health care, control the schools and thereby the doctrine the children grow up with.....were sliding left, it's like a glacier, slow and no stopping it. Trump is the "I hate this game" vote.
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Abraham Lincoln
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Abraham Lincoln
The reality is this... There is the whole spectrum of mild, moderate and "extreme" liberal and conservative candidates who run each cycle. The primaries are composed of "moderates" like Romney and Clinton and more left or right candidates like Santorum or Sanders. In between there is typically a dozen candidates that are all over the place. If you can get a solid base of 5 to 10% you will raise money, build strength and potential long term personal financial stability (example Palin and probably Sanders). They each attempt to find their base to win the nomination, then move to "moderation" and go for broke in the general.
CPT (Join to see)
Another note is when you are elected, it's extremely hard to sustain universal support. The opposition and their allies do all they can to paint each vote as extreme. If your in leadership you are supposed to be more of a leader who designs a plan that pleases your caucus or 200 house of 50 Senate members. So once you have that responsibility conservatives or liberals basically declare war and do all they can to remove you. Typically there is a wealthy individual in the district who fires up the base and game on.
I reject your loaded assumptions and therefore your question.
"Socialist" has a lot more meaning and emotion behind it. In the US, it's a pejorative.
Even Bernie wasn't a socialist. He said he supported the Nordic style of Democratic Socialism, which bears no resemblance to the Stalinism an American means when he says 'socialist.'
In fact, the American Socialist Party and the American Communist Party both reject Bernie, saying he's not a socialist, he's just another Democrat. Check it out.
"Socialist" has a lot more meaning and emotion behind it. In the US, it's a pejorative.
Even Bernie wasn't a socialist. He said he supported the Nordic style of Democratic Socialism, which bears no resemblance to the Stalinism an American means when he says 'socialist.'
In fact, the American Socialist Party and the American Communist Party both reject Bernie, saying he's not a socialist, he's just another Democrat. Check it out.
Suspended Profile
Capt Michael Greene - I never made a case that only the Dems were in trouble but I'd hardly say that everything is fine there.
Capt Michael Greene
MAJ Charles Blake - That's all "not good" stuff, but not hardly a destruction of the party. The Dems still stand for civil rights and taking care of America's less fortunate--nothing has changed there in several decades.
Point of fact: HRC was not booed, the idea of switching allegiance to her was booed.
Point of fact: HRC was not booed, the idea of switching allegiance to her was booed.
Suspended Profile
Capt Michael Greene - tomato / tomato
Point of fact: all politicians are for civil rights and taking care of America's less fortunate. No one has a monopoly on that. That's as silly as saying that only dems care about clean air and water.
My comments were not loaded, but yours sure seem to be.
Point of fact: all politicians are for civil rights and taking care of America's less fortunate. No one has a monopoly on that. That's as silly as saying that only dems care about clean air and water.
My comments were not loaded, but yours sure seem to be.
Capt Michael Greene
"all politicians are for civil rights and taking care of America's less fortunate."
Trump? Cheney? Rick Scott?
Trump? Cheney? Rick Scott?
Read This Next
Us Libertarians want to take over the country and then leave you the hell alone to your own devices! ;)