Posted on Jul 13, 2015
Did the Federal Government have the responsibility to recognize Kate Steinle's death?
3.07K
22
23
4
4
0
Megyn Kelly takes on President Obama's silence after Kate Steinle's murder.
From "The Kelly File" on July 9, 2015.
Kate Steinle was killed by an illegal immigrant with 7 previous felonies, and 5 previous deportations from the US. He was allowed to remain in the country due the San Francisco's "Sanctuary City" Policy. Her death was clearly a tragedy, but should the White house have reacted to her funeral, based on the political implications?
https://youtu.be/8c6TF-a0AJo
https://youtu.be/8c6TF-a0AJo
Posted in these groups: 
Politics
Politics
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 9
3
3
0
She is not a black thug that can be used to further his race baiting agenda therefore her life is of little consequence to him.
(3)
(0)
PVT Robert Gresham
Correct !! I find it very sad that the life of young woman was cut short, due to a questionable practice in one city, and the White House chose to send no representatives or make any kind of statement. I believe that this incident could (and should) lead to some very hard questions from the Voters in the next election.
(1)
(0)
3
3
0
This administration only comments on deaths when it can stir up more violence and division.
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
PVT Robert Gresham
The President does not need to comment on everyone's death but in this case he should.
Her death is a direct result of President Obama's and his parties willingness to violate existing federal laws. It hurts the creditability of the city of SF, the Dems and Obama by remaining silent on the issue.
Advocating for illegal aliens is what we expect from parties, but breaking the law through ignoring or omission of action is step too far. Once they allow the condition, an argument can be made they are responsible for the foreseeable consequences of their actions.
The President does not need to comment on everyone's death but in this case he should.
Her death is a direct result of President Obama's and his parties willingness to violate existing federal laws. It hurts the creditability of the city of SF, the Dems and Obama by remaining silent on the issue.
Advocating for illegal aliens is what we expect from parties, but breaking the law through ignoring or omission of action is step too far. Once they allow the condition, an argument can be made they are responsible for the foreseeable consequences of their actions.
(2)
(0)
PVT Robert Gresham
How far can even the President go if / when this becomes a nationwide debate? Can he possibly ignore the problem until the end of his term?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google