Posted on Aug 13, 2015
Do you believe that allowing military spouses to purchase handguns, in a state where their husband/wife is stationed, is a good thing?
7.94K
33
25
2
2
0
Responses: 11
Why is this even a question? A spouse, service member or citizen should be able to purchase a firearm in any state, as long as they pass the federal background check.
(12)
(0)
LT (Join to see)
Its a questions because questions generate a discussion. I am with you, but some people aren't and I want to know what everyone thinks about the topic and why. Problem is that not every background check looks at all the same data on a state level and a person might not be eligible in one state but may be considered eligible in another.
(0)
(0)
LT (Join to see)
Negative. I am all for being able to purchase weapons freely without a background check. However, I do feel there needs to be some sort of way to identify those who have lost those rights because of crimes and what not that disqualify them.
(0)
(0)
There should be no more restrictions on a military family than anyone else in the state if they have orders assigning them there. I understand some states may require you are a legal resident there. Well those PCS orders should handle that qualifier. Never had a problem with my guns, and I never worried about the family when i was deployed. The Mrs and most of the kids could shoot as well as I could and clean the weapon afterward...
(6)
(0)
LT (Join to see)
I have encountered the issue because I don't often change my vehicle registration and drivers license so at first glance I'm not a resident. I don't just carry my orders everywhere.
(0)
(0)
SFC Everett Oliver
LT (Join to see) -
I always changed my vehicle registration but still had my expired Ohio drivers license when i retired. It had been expired for nearly 20 years. Today I have a current OH DL but a CCP from Arizona....
I always changed my vehicle registration but still had my expired Ohio drivers license when i retired. It had been expired for nearly 20 years. Today I have a current OH DL but a CCP from Arizona....
(0)
(0)
LT (Join to see)
I've found that not changing it is easier. For example I don't pay any taxes in California and I don't have to worry about all of the inspections either.
(1)
(0)
This should not even have to be a law since it is in the 2nd Amendment. But based on reality, I do think that spouses of military should be able to purchase firearms in the state in which they reside. With the potential threats from terrorists, I would want every military family to be able to choose to protect themselves, not have the government decide that for them.
(5)
(0)
I believe the "in state" restriction on handguns is asinine, since it doesn't apply to long guns (Rifles or Shot guns). Military on orders are classified as "Residents" of the state where they are stationed, whereas Spouses & Dependents are not granted the same classification. That's the issue.
A spouse CAN purchase a weapon in the state which her husband is located by changing her residency to that state. Many/Most do not however, as they are not required to, and it is often to their disadvantage to do so.
A spouse CAN purchase a weapon in the state which her husband is located by changing her residency to that state. Many/Most do not however, as they are not required to, and it is often to their disadvantage to do so.
(2)
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
TSgt Joshua Copeland I can speak a "little" to this as my former company (sister company) sold to the exchange system.
The Exchange, which is located on Base, is located inside the specific state. Each Base has an agreement with the State (or the Department of the Interior). It has an Address, like Camp Pendleton, CALIFORNIA, or Quantico, VIRGINIA.
To purchase a firearm on Quantico, you go through the Virginia firearm process. You fill out the Federal & State forms, and adhere to the local laws. You must be a Legal Resident of Virginia to purchase a handgun in the State of Virginia (Federal Law). Those with Permanent Orders to a Base in Virginia (including the Pentagon, even though it has a DC address) are classified as Virginia Residents. For Residents of Fort Campbell which exists in two states (Kentucky & Tennessee), you may purchase as though you were a resident of either (off base). I don't know the specifics of the Exchange.
The major advantage service members have is that they may purchase firearms not only in their state of residence (where they are from), but the state which they are are ordered to. They must have the necessary identification however, which adds a level of complexity though.
The Exchange, which is located on Base, is located inside the specific state. Each Base has an agreement with the State (or the Department of the Interior). It has an Address, like Camp Pendleton, CALIFORNIA, or Quantico, VIRGINIA.
To purchase a firearm on Quantico, you go through the Virginia firearm process. You fill out the Federal & State forms, and adhere to the local laws. You must be a Legal Resident of Virginia to purchase a handgun in the State of Virginia (Federal Law). Those with Permanent Orders to a Base in Virginia (including the Pentagon, even though it has a DC address) are classified as Virginia Residents. For Residents of Fort Campbell which exists in two states (Kentucky & Tennessee), you may purchase as though you were a resident of either (off base). I don't know the specifics of the Exchange.
The major advantage service members have is that they may purchase firearms not only in their state of residence (where they are from), but the state which they are are ordered to. They must have the necessary identification however, which adds a level of complexity though.
(0)
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
See my above response. It's what can best be described as an "oversight" in the law that requires you to be a resident of the state which you are purchasing the handgun in.
(0)
(0)
Personally, I don't see the need to do this if the military member already has that privilege, and either or, if the military member purchases the weapon, who cares who in the family shoots it, as long as the military member is responsible enough to have a spouse/dependent attend a weapons safety course. And as far as living in one state and traveling to another to work, does this mean that CWC and transporting weapons across all state lines will be acceptable? Otherwise, that understanding is shot down as well. Since most spouses tend to change states with their husband for work, etc. ((from my observance and opinion only), I really don't see the need for this bill. I'm beginning to wonder "who", exactly, is pushing for this... Sounds like someone's looking to sway votes from the lambs... I'm sure there are a lot of other more important bills they could be "pushing on" right now...
(1)
(0)
TSgt (Join to see)
With all due respect MSgt, my wife is an adult; she should not have to depend on me to purchase her self-defense weapon. She may be a dependent, but she is more capable on a weapon than most people wearing a marksmanship ribbon, so the government has no business saying she does not have the right do get one.
And also, I do not view it as a privilege; it is a right laid out in the Second Amendment. There should be no restriction for any U.S. citizen to purchase a firearm in any U.S. state or territory.
And also, I do not view it as a privilege; it is a right laid out in the Second Amendment. There should be no restriction for any U.S. citizen to purchase a firearm in any U.S. state or territory.
(0)
(0)
A spouse or dependent should be able to buy a gun just like anyone else. They should not be penalized just because of the service member.
(0)
(0)
LT (Join to see)
I think this law is proposed because not everyone changes there home of record and therefore they don't officially become residents of the state with proof.
(0)
(0)
I agree with SGT Kevin Brown, why is this a problem or concern?
My wife has a Ruger LC9s she carries in her purse. She's been to the range with it. She's cleaned it. She's been educated when she should and shouldn't use it. And before we can afford a vacation, she's getting her CCL so she can carry in States with Reprocity.
My wife has a Ruger LC9s she carries in her purse. She's been to the range with it. She's cleaned it. She's been educated when she should and shouldn't use it. And before we can afford a vacation, she's getting her CCL so she can carry in States with Reprocity.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next

Military Family
Family
Gun Control
Spouses
