Do you really believe the Trump Administration would throw America under the bus?

Indictments that have nothing to do with collusion.

Actually the indictments of Paul Manafort and Rick Gates is about laundering money and being unregistered agents of the Government of Ukraine between 2006 and 2015 prior to being associated with the Trump campaign.

General Flynn was indicted for lying to the FBI about contacting the Russian Government and discussing delaying a UN resolution dealing with Israeli settlements which took place after the election. Which was in the scope of his duties as National Security Adviser and not illegal.

The server and cell phone use by Hillary was not a mistake, it was criminal negligence and with regard to classified top secret/special access program information, everyone else would be in jail for ten years and $10,000 fine.
Eight top secret passages and 37 secret passages - that passed through Clinton's private server suggested criminality. And FBI document said, “The sheer volume of information that was properly classified as Secret at the time it was discussed on email supports an inference that the participants were grossly negligent in their handling of that information."

December 15, 2017: Clinton and Abedin were permitted to remove both electronic and physical records, claiming "they were 'personal' materials and 'unclassified, non-record materials,' including files of Clinton’s calls and schedules, which were not to be made public." These new documents show the Obama State Department had a deal with Hillary Clinton to hide her calls logs and schedules, which would be contrary to FOIA and other laws." https://www.dailywire.com/news/24711/obama-state-dept-made-deal-hillary-allowing-ryan-saavedra
Jan. 1, 2018: Huma Abedin, the top aide to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, used her insecure personal email provider to conduct sensitive work. This guarantees that an account with high-level correspondence in Clinton’s State Department was impacted by one or more of a series of breaches — at least one of which was perpetrated by a “state-sponsored actor.”
Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, regularly forwarded work emails to her personal [login to see] address. “She would use these accounts if her (State) account was down or if she needed to print an email or document. Abedin further explained that it was difficult to print from the DoS system so she routinely forwarded emails to her non-DoS accounts so she could more easily print,” an FBI report says.
Abedin sent passwords for her government laptop to her Yahoo account on Aug. 24, 2009, an email released by the State Department in September 2017 shows.
Long-time Clinton confidante Sid Blumenthal sent Clinton an email in July 2009 with the subject line: “Important. Not for circulation. You only. Sid.” The email began “CONFIDENTIAL… Re: Moscow Summit.” Abedin forwarded the email to her Yahoo address, potentially making it visible to hackers.
Clinton downplayed the risks of her email use days later, saying it was simply a matter of convenience.
“After a year-long investigation, there is no evidence that anyone hacked the server I was using and there is no evidence that anyone can point to at all, anyone who says otherwise has no basis, that any classified materials ended up in the wrong hands. I take classified materials very seriously and always have,” Clinton said on Oct. 9, 2016, at the second presidential debate,
Abedin’s use of Yahoo email is consistent with the determination by the FBI that Clinton associates’ emails were, in fact, compromised. “We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private email accounts of individuals with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her private account,” then-FBI director Jim Comey said in 2016.
The released copy says “Classified by DAS/ A/GIS, DoS on 10/30/2015 Class: Confidential.”
Clinton forwarded Abedin an email titled “Ambassadors” in March 2009 from Denis McDonough, who served as foreign policy adviser to former President Barack Obama’s campaign and later as White House chief of staff. The email was heavily redacted before being released to the public.
Stuart Delery, chief of staff to the deputy attorney general, sent a draft memo titled “PA/PLO Memo” in May 2009, seemingly referring to two Palestinian groups. The content was withheld from the public with large letters spelling “Page Denied.” Abedin forwarded it to her Yahoo account.
Clinton forwarded Abedin an email titled “Ambassadors” in March 2009 from Denis McDonough, who served as foreign policy adviser to former President Barack Obama’s campaign and later as White House chief of staff. The email was heavily redacted before being released to the public.
Stuart Delery, chief of staff to the deputy attorney general, sent a draft memo titled “PA/PLO Memo” in May 2009, seemingly referring to two Palestinian groups. The content was withheld from the public with large letters spelling “Page Denied.” Abedin forwarded it to her Yahoo account.

Why Hillary Clinton and Silly Billy are corrupt.
See my 27 page essay Mena, AR -- The Crimes of Bill and Hillary Clinton regarding drug trafficking and money laundering send me an email and I will reply with this essay [login to see]

It was my job as a counterintelligence special agent and SSO to train soldiers about the NSA rules and to arrest any soldier who may have done far less that Hillary Clinton and her aides. No one is about the law and every public official has a higher duty to insure the law is faithfully executed and no one is above the law.

In this video a scientist explains the scientific methods used in the discovery of nanothermite. This compound was developed by Lawrence Livermore Labs for the Department of Defense a few years before 9/11. You may want to watch it after you read the following. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I51fDKsuJ_I


1. Molten metal: There are numerous photographs and eyewitness testimonies to the presence of molten metal at the WTC, both in the buildings and in the rubble. No legitimate explanation has been provided for this evidence other than the exothermic reaction of thermite, which generates the temperatures required and molten iron as a product. http://www.waarheid911.nl/14pointsstudy.pdf
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html…


2. The fires at Ground Zero could not be put out for several months. Despite the application of millions of gallons of water to the pile, several rainfall events at the site, and the use of a chemical fire suppressant, the fires would not subside. Thermal images made by satellite showed that the temperatures in the pile were far above that expected in the debris from a typical structure fire. Only thermite, which contains its own oxidant and therefore cannot be extinguished by smothering it, can explain this evidence.


3. There was a distinct “white smoke” present—clearly different from smoke caused by a normal structural fire—as indicated by eyewitnesses and photographic evidence.[2] The second major product of the thermite reaction is aluminum oxide, which is emitted as a white solid shortly after reaction.


4. Peer-reviewed, scientific research confirmed the presence of extremely high temperatures at the WTC. The high temperatures were evidenced by metallic and other microspheres, along with evaporated metals and silicates. These findings were confirmed by 9/11 investigators and by scientists at an independent company and at the United States Geologic Survey. http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf


EPA report states: “The characteristics of these un-extinguishable fires have not been adequately explained as the results of a normal structure fire, even one accelerated by jet fuel.” Why do we fund the National institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) when they do not explain this?


5. The elemental composition of the metallic microspheres from the WTC dust matches that of metallic microspheres produced by the thermite reaction.
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html


6. The environmental data collected at Ground Zero in the months following 9/11 indicate that violent incendiary fires, like those produced by thermite, occurred on specific dates. Peer-reviewed scientific analysis of these data show that the components of thermite spiked to extraordinary levels on specific dates in both the air and aerosol emissions at Ground Zero. HERE is the link to the EPA report that does not agree with NIST’s bull ship report.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10 [login to see] -4



For months after the destruction at the World Trade Center (WTC) on 11th September, 2001, the fires at Ground Zero (GZ) could not be put out, despite the following facts.
• Several inches of dust covered the entire area after the destruction of the WTC buildings.
• Millions of gallons of water were sprayed onto the debris pile.
• Several rainfall events occurred at GZ, some heavy; and
• A chemical fire suppressant called Pyrocool was pumped into the piles (Lipton and Revkin 2001).


“It is clear that the levels of very fine particulate matter emissions (in the air around ground zero) rose more gradually, and died down more gradually, indicating slower fire dynamics as might be expected from the burning of the organic materials previously thought to exist in the WTC….The extreme spikes in air concentrations of the five volatile organic chemicals noted above, particularly on 3rd, 8th November, and 9th February, point not to other sources of typical combustible materials but to other forms of combustion. Such forms of combustion appear to be violent and short-lived, and thus similar to the effects of energetic materials, like thermite.”


7. Carbon nanotubes have been found in the WTC dust and in the lungs of 9/11 first responders. Formation of carbon nanotubes requires extremely high temperatures, specific metal catalysts, and carbon compounds exactly like those found in nanothermite formulations. Researchers have discovered that nanothermite produces the same kinds of carbon nanotubes. That finding has been confirmed by independent analysis in a commercial contract laboratory. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2854726/


8. A peer-reviewed scientific publication has identified the presence of nanothermite in the WTC dust. One of the critical aspects of that paper has been confirmed by an independent scientist. A visual comparison between nanothermite residues and particles found in the WTC dust is remarkable.


https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf
video of a Chemical engineer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZNQq7XBLwc
9. Numerous eyewitnesses who were fleeing the area described the dust cloud as being extreme hot wind. This evidence agrees with the presence of large quantities of thermite byproducts in the air, including hot metallic microspheres and still-reacting agglomerates of thermite. Now the following URL/link shows pictures of vehicles that were hit by the cloud of dust as it blew. Note the cars alleged to have been seven blocks away, they had been towed there from their original place closer to the ground zero.
What is not possible if jet fuel splashed onto vehicles and started them on fire, is the fire engine’s steel engine block melted or the metal frame of the fire truck. It takes 2,750 degree F. to do that and a little jet fuel splashed on iron can not possibly melt, nor the burning of plastic etc. which appears to have caught on fire from jet fuel.
https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/911NutPhysics0.HTM
Here are only a few eye witnesses accounts of the hot wind. Fire fighters know hot when they describe it.

“When I was running, some hot stuff went down by back, because I didn’t have time to put my coat back on, and I had some — well, I guess between first and second degree burns on my back.” -Marcel Claes, FDNY Firefighter
“And then we’re engulfed in the smoke, which was horrendous. One thing I remember, it was hot. The smoke was hot and that scared me” -Paramedic Manuel Delgado
“A huge, huge blast of hot wind gusting and smoke and dust and all kinds of debris hit me” -Firefighter Louis Giaconelli
“This super-hot wind blew and it just got dark as night and you couldn’t breathe” -Firefighter Todd Heaney
https://digwithin.net/2013/12/08/thermite/

10. Now when you look at the collapsing of the Twin Towers look at the white smoke (aluminum oxide) trailing from steel columns as they fall. It is like burning logs falling thru the air, but steel can not burn. Even if it were yellow or white hot, it would not smoke. What is burning is exothermic fire (fire that burns without access to oxygen from the air). Hydrocarbons only burns if there is lots of oxygen in the place it is burning.


Here is the video of Physicist Jeff Farrer discussing how he and Steve Jones made their findings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzbABnP5uWU

molten steel and good photos of the Swiss cheezed steel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

This is a video that includes evidence of explosions on the World Trade Center buildings, yet NIST said they had heard no such witness statements. That alone should be enough to demand a new public Congressional investigation given this gross negligence by NIST to follow up on these leads. Try to ignore all the video chips of real explosive demolitions of buildings, the important point is the total of eye witness statements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxxXAC3m1eQ

Molten steel six weeks after Sept. 11th. Firefighters were pouring water on the wreckage all this time. Below the surface of the debris piles any, repeat ANY fire burning would have put itself out due to the lack of oxygen! This fact is EXTREMELY strong evidence that heat in the wreckage was generated by a chemical reaction, mostly likely nanothemite, thermite or thermate was burning. Yet, NIST said they had not heard any evidence of pools of molten steel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU&t=124s

2,964 architects and engineers, http://www.ae911truth.org some 600 PhD scientists and some 350 skilled commercial airplane pilots want a new Congressional investigation.

Best 9/11 video of hard evidence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STICJ9gfB2s

This is another important video with the following notes about the very important scientific evidence pointing to explosives have been used to collapse the World Trade Center buildings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Lg28z2a9zY

Physicist Jeff Farrer working with Professor Steven Jones at BYU, examined phases of melted steel of the steel wreckage from 9/11. They got the pieces of steel from Clarkson University, in Potsdam, NY.
SEE photos of the monument from which the steel sample was obtained. http://livingmemorial.voicesofseptember11.org/memorials/clarkson-university-911-memorial
This college got the steel pieces for the purpose of making a manorial monument. I do not know what phases of steel means, but Farrers says they cannot be made with a blow torch, therefore, the cut pieces of steel were not melted by the men clearing the wreckage using blow torches to cut the steel beams into smaller sections. Farrers and Jones found small amounts of aluminum mixed in the steel specimen and more significantly was the presence of sulfur within the steel.
It takes 2,750 degree Fahrenheit to melt steel for sulfur to get into the steel, but then the question became how do you get this high a temperature, because office or burning jet fuel only gets to 1,652 degrees F.

FEMA employee Jonathan Barnett, collected pieces of steel from both the Twin Towers and building seven showed signed of oxidation or looked like it have vaporized to paper thickness and look like Swiss cheese.
It is not possible for the calcium sulfate dihydrate of which dry wall is made, to get sulfur from it mixed into the steel. Drywall also known as plasterboard, wallboard, gypsum panel, or sheet rock was used to make walls in the WTC buildings. But office fires do not get hot enough to separate/disassociate the sulfur molecules chemically and get it into the steel.
There is sulfur in thermate, therefore, we have the hypothesis for probably how sulfur was found mixed with those steel samples.
Jonathan Barnett’s findings were never reported in NIST or FEMA’s final reports.

Physicist Jeff Farrer concluded that the red/gray chips had to have been made in a very high tech way due to the massive uniformity of iron oxide formations of the same microscopic size and shape. Therefore, his hypothesis is that it is nanothermite and a highly energetic material (aka an explosive) not simple like thermate which does not explode, but only melts steel.

Here is the video of Physicist Jeff Farrer discussing how he and Steve Jones made their findings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzbABnP5uWU

molten steel and good photos of the Swiss cheezed steel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTa_XL_k8fY

This is a video that includes evidence of explosions on the World Trade Center buildings, yet NIST said they had heard no such witness statements. That alone should be enough to demand a new public Congressional investigation given this gross negligence by NIST to follow up on these leads. Try to ignore all the video chips of real explosive demolitions of buildings, the important point is the total of eye witness statements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxxXAC3m1eQ

Molten steel six weeks after Sept. 11th. Firefighters were pouring water on the wreckage all this time. Below the surface of the debris piles any, repeat ANY fire burning would have put itself out due to the lack of oxygen! This fact is EXTREMELY strong evidence that heat in the wreckage was generated by a chemical reaction, mostly likely nanothemite, thermite or thermate was burning. Yet, NIST said they had not heard any evidence of pools of molten steel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU&t=124s

more about the color of molten aluminum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxFXFkN6FaI
Irrefutable Evidence - The 9/11 Official Story is Total BS
about 100 pages
you can send me an email at [login to see] and I will send you a book and/or a shorter paper for free

or For sale at Amazon Kindle books
https://kdp.amazon.com/en_US/bookshelf?ref_=kdp_BS_D_TN_bs