Posted on Jan 20, 2021
Do you support the new commander in chief? Why or why not?
19K
1.67K
673
230
230
0
Posted in these groups: 
Office of the President (POTUS)
Election 2020
Office of the President (POTUS) Election 2020
Posted 5 y ago
Responses: 221
2
2
0
While I would not seek to undermine any sitting President, I fear what we have today is a guy who is total "milk toast." What concerns me more is whether or not he'll be able to complete four years - too many videos that suggest dementia, and not just the altered ones. The concern is what will happen if Harris ascends to the Oval Office. I feel she is utterly dangerous.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
No I do not. My military is past and I follow who I want. I could not follow Trump and I will not follow Biden. Presidents also swear to uphold the Constitution yet this man immediately proposed anti second amendment and other standards. I just see a further weakening of the US as a world leader.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
I support him! I feel he and his cabinet will restore faith in America and it's citizens!
(2)
(0)
SSG Shawn Mcfadden
MSgt Currie C. - That doesn't explain why Biden was leading in the electoral votes during the whole time during the election. Does not explain why trump lost every court case except for one, challenging the results of the election. When trump was elected, it wasn't because of the popular vote, but the electoral votes. If you want to complain to someone about the election results, complain to trump's legal team. THEY are the ones you should be mad at, since they represented trump so poorly.
(0)
(0)
PO1 Scott Woodward
SSG Shawn Mcfadden - The ABRUPT end of Keystone only ensures that the jobs it supported have also abruptly ended. BTW, have you ever heard of or seen HAZMAT rail shipment spills/fires?
(1)
(0)
SSG Shawn Mcfadden
PO1 Scott Woodward - In the beginning, about 20,000 people were involved in building that pipeline. Once finished, the number shrank to about 2,000. However, you still have the issues of pollution if there is a leak anywhere in that system, which would not be really addressed due to the regulations put on the EPA being relaxed to the point that any response to environmental pollution would be close to nonexistent. Before you reply, you should look at that happened during the Exxon Valdez fiasco, perhaps you'll get the point then.
(0)
(0)
PO1 Scott Woodward
Sure Shawn,
Now you just ignore the rail issue, shift gears to the Exxon Valdez, and then be sarcastic again. Help me out, what's the point in comparing the Super tanker impact on the pristine ocean/coastline interface, with a pipeline spill on land? Keep up the cynical, critical and subjective comments, they really help. I feel like I'm back in middle school. Take care.
Now you just ignore the rail issue, shift gears to the Exxon Valdez, and then be sarcastic again. Help me out, what's the point in comparing the Super tanker impact on the pristine ocean/coastline interface, with a pipeline spill on land? Keep up the cynical, critical and subjective comments, they really help. I feel like I'm back in middle school. Take care.
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
2
0
The Office must be respected. The man can be despised. His will can be frustrated if his policies are destructive to the military.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
Let me help you understand some things the Commander in Chief will never do. If you are the smallest WAF in the Air Force chinning yourself on 3 feet of pipe stuck over a breaking handle he will never walk up and offer to hang on that breaking handle with you. If your wife also a Sarge who is pregnant without permission overseas is sent to start a generator he will never hand crank it for her when the battery is dead. When that baby comes and you get caught out in a Thai thunderstorm with rain drops about the size of your thumb he will never give you the shirt off his back to cover that baby with.
If it really gets bad and you are living on enemy rations carrying enemy weapons and rationing enemy ammunition he will never give you half what he just got by killing a man on guard with a bayonet. So look after the people in your squad, in your shop on your watch in your barracks keep the promise you made when you enlisted and don't worry about who the President is or whether you like him or not.
If it really gets bad and you are living on enemy rations carrying enemy weapons and rationing enemy ammunition he will never give you half what he just got by killing a man on guard with a bayonet. So look after the people in your squad, in your shop on your watch in your barracks keep the promise you made when you enlisted and don't worry about who the President is or whether you like him or not.
(2)
(0)
1
1
0
1
1
0
I am so glad I got out before this putz took office. I support the office and while in uniform would have the obligation to follow all legal orders. But what the current occupant of the oval office is doing is bordering on treason and I am happy that don't have to be conflicted between his actions and my duty to follow him.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
I support the Office, not the man. He has already shown he's corrupt and intent on tearing apart the United States. And Committed Impeachable offenses while in office, but no investigation by the DoJ or FBI. I find this disturbing, same for the Speaker of the House N. Pelosi with Roof on National Television, as well as the Former Secretary of State H. Clinton. If a Commanding Officer or NCO committed such acts , they would find themselves in front of a court martial...... He's Actions insinuate directions from Communists and not the will of the American people...
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google