Posted on Oct 5, 2015
Do you think male Soldiers should know the female regulations in AR 670-1 just as much as the female herself?
61.4K
210
117
18
17
1
DA Pam 670-1
Army Regulations
Soldiers
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 83
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
2
0
Absolutely. I remember as a squad leader in the Army, I had a female soldier that came in with studs in her ears. This is against regulation. Her and I both were about to be sent home without drill pay for the day.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
2
2
0
2
2
0
SSG Monica Mims (Rhett), Yes, if you are a leader you need to know the regulations that cover those you lead and at the bare minimum you need to know which one covers each topic such as AR 670-1, AR 600-9, DA PAM 670-1, AR 600-8-2 etc. so that you can quickly reference it if you yourself have a question about someone's appearance, etc.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
SFC (Join to see) All Leaders need to know the proper wear of uniforms for both genders. Now regular Joes have a hard enough time getting their stuff straight without having to worry about the other gender, so I don't think lower enlisted need to.
(2)
(0)
SSG Warren Swan
SGM I see what you mean, but what about lower enlisted in leadership positions (SPC or sh*t hot PFC in a TM LDR slot)? At that point CPL or no, they should know or have a decent grasp on both sides right?
(2)
(0)
SGM Steve Wettstein
SSG Warren Swan - That would be covered in the "All Leaders" part Brother. At first I had NCOs but changed it because I had SPC Team Leaders that I made to know both genders.
(1)
(0)
SFC Dwayne Gilson
All SM should know it. I used to tell the lowest ranking person in platoon that if they see an infraction they should do on the spot correction using tact of course
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
Yes, because you should be able to correct the male and female soldier equally!
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google