Posted on Jun 13, 2018
Does anyone have any experience with this replacement for the APFT?
11.7K
36
25
11
11
0
Does anyone have any experience with this new test that’s supposed to be replacing the APFT? What’s the pass/fail mark? What do the raw score numbers mean on the back toss? Are there alternate events? I don’t see these things being doable for people with shoulder/back profiles.
APFT
Fitness
Profiles
ACFT
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 14
6
6
0
What in the world is this change. I am stationed at an AIT location Ft Lee, Va and heck the fail rate for the current APFT is high. Look, stop thinking that new recruits are much better equipped to deal with Mental and physical challenges. I witness this on a daily basis. Give them a cell or tablet test and now you are talking.
(6)
(0)
5
5
0
Is there anything much harder on a back injury that a sit up? The leg lift thing isn't easy, I do those at the gym when I feel like torturing myself. The sprint thing doesn't look fun either.
(5)
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
https://www.army.mil/article/193953/with_six_events_new_army_combat_readiness_test_aims_to_replace_apft_cut_injuries
I am concerned about the train-up and the time needed to administer this test.
I am concerned about the train-up and the time needed to administer this test.
With six events, new Army Combat Readiness Test aims to replace APFT, cut injuries
About 120 Fort Lee Soldiers had one of the first looks at the Army Combat Readiness Test Wednesday and Thursday, which gauges Soldiers on five components of physical fitness -- muscular and aerobic endurance, muscular strength, speed/agility and expl...
(0)
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
SSG (Join to see) - I'm a bit confused, is 180 total points now a passing score? That's how it looks.
A lot of this stuff can be local fabricated, but it will be interesting to see it implemented.
A lot of this stuff can be local fabricated, but it will be interesting to see it implemented.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
Thank GOD that I am getting ready to retire and turn the Army over to the Millennial trolls.
(3)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google