Posted on Nov 27, 2014
Does anyone remember the M247 SGT York Anti-Aircraft gun platform?
9.47K
11
9
1
1
0
For those who do not, the M247 SGT York was developed in the 1970s as a companion to the M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle and the M1 Abrams Tank. It utilized the M48 Patton Tank carriage and had a turret which was designed for anti-aircraft application. The program was cancelled in the 1980s due to serious cost over runs.
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 4
WOW!!! This is a piece of equipment I didn't know about. Looks to be a pretty decent weapon to use but it's understandable the cost was too much.
(2)
(0)
SGM (Join to see)
I think the problem with the SGT York was that once you fire a shell, you have no more control over it. The radar can point you in the right direction, and give you a range to set a fuse with, but the shell still has to be near the target when it explodes, or all you are doing is producing a fireworks show.
The Vulcan had a decent ground attack role, but the 57 mm shell in the SGT York wasn't effective against armor and was too expensive to use on infantry.
The Vulcan had a decent ground attack role, but the 57 mm shell in the SGT York wasn't effective against armor and was too expensive to use on infantry.
(2)
(0)
I think we ripped off the commies. It was too similiar to the mass produced ZSU 57-2.
(Z=Self Propelled) SU= (Anti-aircraft) 57=(diameter in mm's) -2= (# of barrels).
(Z=Self Propelled) SU= (Anti-aircraft) 57=(diameter in mm's) -2= (# of barrels).
(1)
(0)
PO3 Isaac Bilano
From what I read about it, it didn't seem very befitting for it's namesake when it couldn't hit its targets. A total insult to Alvin York.
(1)
(0)
SFC Dr. Joseph Finck, BS, MA, DSS
SFC Mark Merino In my research, I remember reading this was in response to the ZSU 57-2.
(0)
(0)
SFC Dr. Joseph Finck, BS, MA, DSS
PO3 Isaac Bilano You are correct. This was an abysmal piece of gear and it never targeted or functioned as it was intended.
(0)
(0)
I saw this in a museum, think it was at Ft Knox at the time. Been so long ago.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next