Does White Privilege exist? If so, do you think White Supremacy exists also?

I've been white all my life, and have had to work hard for everything I have. I've earned everything-nothing was given to me because of my skin color.

Not sure what Fox News has to do with anything...

MAJ Ryan you are full of shit on every level. Your response is pathetic and straight from MSNBC or huffingtonpost. It is more vile drab, blah blah bullshit and "facts" because you say they are facts.. with nothing to back any of it up.

Just to inform your dumb ass, I get none of my information from "storefront and the like". In fact I get a lot of information from people like LTC Allen West, here is an article of his you should read sometime if you can stand an ounce of truth http://www.allenbwest.com/allen/shocking-statistics-about-black-slavery-liberals-will-never-admit


MAJ (Join to see) -

Don't you mean *retired in disgrace over torturing a detainee* LTC West? How about *fired from a blogging platform for racist comments* LTC West? Or perhaps *never knew a conspiracy theory he didn't like* LTC West. Maybe *routinely has falsehoods called out on his website, and has regularly shadow-edited to remove the most egregious without admitting it, but leaves the rest up* LTC West. Seriously, looking up to him says a lot about someone, and exactly zero of it is good.

And that article is a perfect example. Is the issue of fatherless children real? Yes. And should we endeavor to do something about it? Also yes. But it's off of that one nugget that the lies start. It conflates children born out of wedlock (a high number among blacks) to children without the father in their life (a much lower number, and one that is concerning for much more than just blacks). He loosely tries to pin all of this to welfare, but when you actually track welfare outlays it isn't going nearly as much to black communities (let alone unwed black mothers) as would be necessary for the conclusions he draws. He quotes one academic, a free-market libertarian and Ayn Rand devotee who has attempted for decades to pin every possible social ill to any government program possible (earning him a lot of criticism from his peers for overreaching on his assumptions) but has been notably absent of publishing actual scholarly support for his ideas. He scare-quotes Margaret Sanger, in an item that is quite literally of the vein of "we don't want to let others about our goals" into an insinuation of that exact form about her goals. (Though to be fair, Sanger did hold some not so pleasant views about sterilization of the poor, which is why liberals don't spend much time defending her and why conservatives can't stop talking about her.) In the end, he circles back and blames... teachers unions? This is some seriously unhinged stuff, and as with almost every word West writes, is utterly devoid of integrity (as are those who lap it up)...

"...you are full of shit on every level..."
Well, at least we firmly established your character, not that it was ever really in doubt. What a piss-poor example to the cadets you work with...

The good thing is, facts and truth don't change just because you got riled up and called me a name or two. I don't exist to be your personal tutor -- people with the desire to find accurate information can easily verify what I've said. That you've gotten this far without having been corrected can easily be considered a failure of your education. Whine all you want; you'll never be right, and the fact that you know it makes your petulance almost funny.