One of the more prominent arguments gun-grabbers make is comparing crime statistics of America to foreign countries. They may point out England and Australia with strict gun laws though not as strict as Mexico, with their much lower gun crime rates. What they don't point out is that gun crime has ALWAYS been low there, even long before they passed such strict laws; they only erupted after public outcry from massacres such as Port Arthur, Dunblane, etc. Furthermore, they don't point out countries like Mexico, Brazil, and Russia which have much higher homicide rates than America despite having even far stricter gun laws. The gun grabbers act as if guns are the only way to commit murder; look at massacres like Oklahoma City and 9/11; the death tolls there were much higher than places like Virginia Tech or Fort Hood, yet not a single shot was fired there.
(I have noticed that many people have said things better than i can, so i am just borrowing what they said and how they said it. Hence the picture i have posted)
The 2nd Amendment is the only License required. All gun control laws on the books are all UNconstitutional.
I think just saying FOR or AGAINST is too black and white. I don't agree with taking guns away or making it impossible for someone to protect themselves. I also don't agree that ANYONE can go and buy ANY gun on the shelves.
This is a thought that just crossed my mind and maybe it sounds silly but tell me what you think. Instead of making certain guns illegal why doesn't the Government implement a license class system. Which means that gun licenses would be like drivers license.
Driver's licenses are issued and gained by completing different levels of knowledge and experience. Just like I can't go and start driving a Big Rig because I think they look cool and I have money to blow. The average person would have to go through specialized training to earn a license that permits them to buy a higher class of weapon.
Within this license class there would be a background check involved and proof of how these weapons are stored. I don't think there should be a limit on how many licenses should be issued. But this could be a way to ensure that only the responsible people are in possession of the more advanced weapon systems.
I know that a lot of people might be against having a data base with information like addresses and what guns they have but I think there could be a way to secure that information.
Also, I believe that there should be an evaluation on medical health to get one of these licenses. As time goes on it seems like these mass shootings are the cause of irresponsibility and mental health problems rather than somebody JUST with the intent to massacre.
I'm sure there would be flaws in this type of system but I would rather compromise with the government than go to war with it.
my 2 cents
PFC R.
I thought I put this here for you and others to see. lol
http://wtfleak.com/this-is-what-happens-when-you-give-a-gun-to-a-monkey/

I'm not against gun control until things like this happen.
These weapons fall in the wrong hands and its the innocent little ones that pay the price.
This is one topic of many, even here in NYC we had a child killed on a dry run by some moron(s). I can not image what these parents must have thought, much worse me a father myself.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/12/children-guns-home-investigation-newtown


Gun Control
Weapons
Politics
Law
