Has anybody successfully submitted an appeal against a falsified NCOER?

Well question 1 is, was he counseled? If not, there's no proof and therefore must receive at least a success, 3/3, fully capable. If the first doesn't care enough to counsel it's their fault, appeal on that basis. Part 2: this should have been kicked back from the examiner, AR 623-3 states substantial comments must justify a needs improvement, and also it's written incorrectly. There should be a lowercase "o" with a space before each bullet. Whoever wrote this needs to be QMP now

As a retired SFC I can say, there's alot of this garbage out there. It's a shame the reviewer let it go!

I have and,,,, A GARBAGE LEADER WROTE THIS GARBAGE NCOER!

The picture of the NCOER is not legit. It doesn't follow procedure at all so I'm assuming this is not the actual NCOER we're looking at. Counseling dates not being the actual day you sat down with the rater is not cause for appeal. Lack of counseling is not likely to overturn the NCOER. How many times do you need to be counseled not to leave your weapon unsecure? If you lost your weapon last week but retained it this week, are you now exceeding the standard and being fully rehabilitated? NCOERs that had successful appeals are removed from your record and a memo goes in its place.
To prepare the appeal, get some third party statements that may refute the facts recorded in the NCOER. Get copies of the rating scheme during that period to ensure rating chain was legitimate.
We recently had a SSG in our BN who was arrested for DUI. Through the court process he received treatment to plead to a lesser charge. Just because the court adjudicated it this way does not mean you can't write on his NCOER that he drove drunk. He tried to appeal because he wasn't convicted but was unsuccessful because he did indeed drive drunk.

Last item is we don't have all the facts.

SGT have them review AR 623-3 Chapter 4. And DA PAM 623-3 Chapter. Then check out our website ASKTOP.net. Search falsifying counseling dates. Or evaluations. There are several post related to the issue. As long as the Soldier did not sign the report they have a good chance

I've been fortunate enough to have decent leadership that did not falsify my records. I am happy to say that. I hope it continues for the 6 more years 'till I retire.

There is nothing wrong with this NCOER. There are no grammatical errors in the writing and the bullets are clear and concise. Stop thinking that $10 words need to be used to write an accurate NCOER. Also, the writer doesn't need to write anything for a success and a needs improvement just needs to be justified. This NCO needs to be less concerned about how well the bullets were written and more concerned about what they can do to improve themselves.

In addition, lets not bash this NCO for having the courage to accurately evaluate a substandard NCO and be thankful that there are still NCOs out there willing to do their job. I would like to shake the hand of the person who wrote this.

List 3 different duty positions in which the rated NCO could best serve the Army at the current or next grade: Recruiter LOL sounds right

Good or bad NCOER, this doesn't even qualify for Review! There is no way S-1 or anyone in the higher chain can let this pass. There's not even counseling dates for performance and standards! If it hits HRC this will be turned around so quick and someone in S-1/G-1 will probably get a phone call!