Has anybody successfully submitted an appeal against a falsified NCOER?

Welfare of two? Hell as a E4 I had to section leader for like 300 awaiting sub school students. That looks very 3.0 vanilla

It's kind of hard to respond considering this NCOER isn't complete. From what is shown, the admin data has not been completed, it's not signed. The bullets on the back are not in the correct format. It's 25U2O not 25U20. The 3 positions the SM could best serve the Army (Section Chief, AIT instructor, and Recruiter) do not reflect the statement 'unsure of future leadership potential of this NCO.' APFT date is missing. Army Values were all checked yes with comment 'learns from mistakes' contradicts 'failed to take responsibility for own actions.' This NCOER wouldn't have made it past a 1SG, much less a CSM review. I worked in S-1 reviewing NCOERs for years. I wouldn't have sent this to the CSM for fear of getting my you know what chewed out for wasting his time. Plus he would have lit up the 1SG for sending up some garbage like this.

So yeah. Got it. There isn't a lot of quantifiable info. Do yall really want your buddies eval to state in more graphic detail about why he deserved a 4\4?!

What's ALC, as in "Send to ALC when NCO is ready." If this is some kind of leadership school, don't waste your time or money.

First of all, this has to be the WEAKEST NCOER ever written. The "Values" certainly do not match the critically short "bulleted" comments on the back. Second, if you are a senior NCO that can not come up with more than one bullet for a comment, then you shouldn't be writing the NCOER in the first place and probably need to be trained and retrained on the very basics of NCOER writing. This looks to me like a last minute pencil whip on a soldier (apparently, not too high speed) that the leadership has given up on or is too lazy to pull make right. If this NCO is debating falsification of the counseling dates and not his/her conduct, I think we all know the bottom line here. I hate to be critical but it feels like a shit bag NCO trying to wiggle his way out of getting kicked out eventually. We have all dealt with the same kind... buck up, shut up, and do your job!!!

I don't know how, but my comment seems to have been deleted.

Other than the values not matching the ratings, I think this is a solid NCOER. The writer was clear and concise. I respect that this leader had the courage rate this mess of a sergeant accurately.

The DA PAM 623-3 provides the framework for an appeal. He needs to involve career management officials, S1, and legal services (JAG and IG). The clock is ticking on substantive appeals. The redress program can be effective, but the appeal is on the Soldier. The Soldier is liable for producing evidence, obtaining statements and submitting the packet. The level of proof can be easy as having the leader who counseled the Soldier produce the counseling. Please keep in mind that the appeal is seeking to right an unjustified statements, they are not their to "change minds".

Wonder where the CSM was during this travesty.

Well at least someone else wrote it. I had to write my own my last 5 years in as well as my own awards.

I mean where are all the "o"'s before the bullets, pure amateur