Posted on May 31, 2015
Has anyone used the M14 rifle and what are your thoughts about that rifle?
42.3K
136
54
11
11
0
The US Rifle, Caliber 7.62, M-14 was officially phased out in the middle 1960s and replaced with the M-16. The M-14 was modified into the M-21 Sniper Weapons System, and has been brought back into use in Iraq and Afghanistan. For those that have been using it, how do you like it, in comparison with the M-4/M-16.
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 36
I love the M-14. I was fortunate enough to carry the fully automatic wood stock M-14 when I was stationed at the 5th Ranger Training Battalion at Camp Merrill, Dahlonega, GA. Sadly, I only fired blanks! I would have loved live fires with that weapon. We also had synthetic stock semi auto M-14s which in my opinion were inferior. I was an armorer for a while and the full auto wood stock versions were beasts!!! I like the stopping power of a 7.62 NATO round period! I would gladly hump the extra weight of an M-14 in Iraq or Afghanistan! It's basically a 20 round magazine full auto M-1 Garand which was/is an excellent rifle I have also had the pleasure to fire as a veteran doing Honor Guard. Sadly, only fired blanks out of the M-1 too! :D
(3)
(0)
SSG Roger Ayscue, we carried them exclusively in SF Phase 1 at Camp Mackall in APR-MAY70, and spent a lot of time with them in the SF Weapons course immediately thereafter. I thought it was an excellent weapon, which seems to be borne out by the majority of positive responses that you have received regarding the M14.
(3)
(0)
SSG Roger Ayscue
I spent some time with the XVIII Airborne Corps Advanced Marksmanship Training Unit (AMTU). I found the M14 to be robust, stout and very reliable. On top of that, It just LOOKS like it kicks ass.
(3)
(0)
I had the M21 for a weapon in the Guard. Nice weapon.
I do not know why anyone thinks sending guys into action with a short carbine in a mountainous region like Afghanistan was a good idea. Its like people lost all concept of range and bullet terminal velocity at range or something. The M4 is more suitbale to a city environment than a place where you can see far beyond the range of a M4. The m14 is much more suited.
I do not know why anyone thinks sending guys into action with a short carbine in a mountainous region like Afghanistan was a good idea. Its like people lost all concept of range and bullet terminal velocity at range or something. The M4 is more suitbale to a city environment than a place where you can see far beyond the range of a M4. The m14 is much more suited.
(3)
(0)
SSG Roger Ayscue
Totally! the M-14 can hit a postage stamp at a grand, and can do 90% of what the M-4 can do. You can not say that about the M-4 regarding the M-14. Anyone that can hit at a grand with an M-4 needs to be shooting professionally and on the Military hero's channel.
(1)
(0)
SSG Melvin Nulph
CSM Via, your telling us you own one of the best weapons, a person can own? If so I'll never disagree with that. It's #3 of my top ten favorite weapons list & I also hope to own one someday. I'm, "Happy for you"... The M1 Garand & B.A.R. automatic rifle are number 1 and 2 on my dream list.
(0)
(0)
I grew up on it. I like it for match use although I used a M1 in 06 for the 1000yd stuff as you needed a little less "oval". I'd like to say it saved my bacon but interesting enough an AK saved my bacon.
I have since did a transformers job on my match M1A and it now has a tac stock with MRAD optics. Great propane cylinder buster at long range. Road flares make it more entertaining. I still use my favorite Sierra 168gr Match King and 4895 powder load for it. It just works every time.
I remember its reliability and the magazine got rid of "M1 Thumb". If you ever get a chance to own history, grab it and shoot it. Like the M1 and 1903, you'll understand more of what it was like.
I have since did a transformers job on my match M1A and it now has a tac stock with MRAD optics. Great propane cylinder buster at long range. Road flares make it more entertaining. I still use my favorite Sierra 168gr Match King and 4895 powder load for it. It just works every time.
I remember its reliability and the magazine got rid of "M1 Thumb". If you ever get a chance to own history, grab it and shoot it. Like the M1 and 1903, you'll understand more of what it was like.
(2)
(0)
I have used the civilian M1A model and I love it. There's a certain satisfaction I get when holding a full sized rifle vs a carbine.
(2)
(0)
I've fired one at the range, and all I can say is that it handled superbly. Great rifle, and very accurate.
(2)
(0)
Such a beautiful weapon! Never used one in the Army, but have put a few rounds in the civilian range.
As a side note: Why in the hell would you mount a ACOG on it?
As a side note: Why in the hell would you mount a ACOG on it?
(2)
(0)
SSG Adam Wyatt
It's faster to slap on something a soldier can pick up quickly than try to teach them about DOPE and the Mil Relation formula.
(4)
(0)
SPC(P) Jay Heenan
Totally agree, it just doesn't look right. Makes you get that look on your face...
(2)
(0)
(2)
(0)
I have a Federal Ordnance M-14 that Joe White rebuilt to M-21 specs for me except for steam drying and coating the stock with epoxy. He did everything else, even changing out my standard barrel and replaced it with a NM barrel. He went to church with my wife until his death. They were/are LDS and I am Southern Baptist, so I got to know him through my wife. I still have the rifle although I never had an ART or ART II scope on it. It has a second ATN X-Sight 4K Pro scope and is my "designated deer rifle".
(1)
(0)
The M-14 was (and still is) a great weapons platform! My initial rifle qualification in the military was accomplished using an M-14. Although replaced as a general service rifle by the M-16 (and later the M-4), the trusty old M-14 still has its place in combat. That said (and I'll probably really be dating myself with this), my initial pistol qualification was accomplished with a .38 cal revolver! Yeah, I'm old!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next


Weapons
Army
Sniper
Squad Designated Marksman

