Posted on Mar 9, 2016
SGT Fire Team Leader
3.09K
5
6
1
1
0
Season 2 of the podcast Serial discusses in depth the "ins and outs" of Bergdahl's story. They examine much more information than is generally discussed in the mainstream media. It provides an interesting look into who Bergdahl really is and how he thinks. Has it changed your perception of him?
Posted in these groups: 46ac8fde Bergdahl
Avatar feed
Responses: 2
SSG Recruiter
1
1
0
I heard snippets from it on the way to work (i believe when NPR did a segment on it) it doesn't matter, how bad his leadership may have been, Men had to go into harms way (resulting in death and injury) to look for him on account of his actions. Inexcusable.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SFC Operations Ncoic
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
Remember that when you view SGT Bergdhal the intent is not to excuse his actions, but to show that there is more to the story than simply the poor application of facts that the media originally portrayed. He was a PFC who violated a basic tenant of the military, BUT he was also a service-member who deserved to be saved, because we DO NOT leave men behind.

It is also important to illustrate that he did spend 5 years as a POW, attempted to escape several times and spent years being tortured by our enemies. Noone agrees with what he did, but people should be able to empathize with a soldier who was kept in captivity for years.

I highly suggest continuing the series to understand more of this dilemma.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Recruiter
SSG (Join to see)
9 y
I absolutley believe that he should not have been left behind, even though his actions led to the deaths and woundings of good men. My anger at his decision and the following events that it caused does make me want to feel otherwise though. If that makes sense.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Professor Of Military Science / Department Chair
1
1
0
Yes, I've heard the first few episodes. Has it altered my view of him and my overall opinion of the ongoing case - not one bit.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Intelligence Analyst
SGT (Join to see)
9 y
Completely agree, did not shift my opinion in his favor at all. I have enjoyed the podcast and find it very interesting but I don't think it has helped his case (not that I care). If anything, the details of his "complaints" about his leadership has shown how deluded he was at the time, if you believe that's why he actually left (which I highly doubt), and have reinforced my opinion that he should be jailed for his desertion.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SFC Operations Ncoic
SFC (Join to see)
9 y
The interesting part of the case is what appropriate punishments should be for his desertion. Due to his status as a Prisoner of War is that time rolled into his punishment. Given the 5 years in captivity I expect his sentence to be concurrent to that time and his discharge to be under General Conditions because he was an American POW.

5 years was the typical sentence for deserting soldiers since WWII, so I do not expect him to serve any more time, but to be found guilty on the desertion charge.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close