Posted on Jun 1, 2016
How are you feeling about Donald Trump as a candidate after his newest endorsement?
13.9K
125
128
3
3
0
Responses: 37
Reverse psychology. I imagine they would much prefer seeing HRC win. They're used to dealing with whining liberal appeasers
(19)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Kim invented reverse psychology between holes during his first round of golf where he shot 36 under par.
(0)
(0)
It's strategic on NK's part. Endorse what you fear because it will create the opposite reaction.
(13)
(0)
Lt Col (Join to see)
SPC Rory J. Mattheisen - I guess there's only room for one bat-shit crazy leader of a nuclear power in the world, eh?
(3)
(0)
SGT Rick Ash
SPC Rory J. Mattheisen - I think you are just jealous of Trump. I heard you have the same hairstyle now....
(0)
(0)
SPC Les Darbison
SPC Rory J. Mattheisen - Did President Trump start a new war? Did President Trump empower our enemies? Did Trump encourage Russia, China, or Iran? Did President Trump enrich our enemies? And hurt not only our economy but the economies of the rest of the world? By lowering our production of fossil fuel exports across the globe. Would you mind enlightening us on the beautiful things Biden has done to lift the standard of living for our retirees? Inflation hurts the middle class and the working poor. There will be no bailout for us! At the same time, Biden has opened the floodgates to illegals without testing their health issues and background checks, as is done for everyone else legally following our immigration rules. So here's the challenge answer my questions without calling me names or using such words as bigot or racist. Here's one more small question for you. What was wrong with President Trump looking out for the ordinary working man and women in our own country? And in doing so, he raised the economy of all free nations!. God bless America
(0)
(0)
The same as I felt about him before. He is a narcissistic bully who instead of talking about substantive issues prefers schoolyard name calling.
He is an absolute disgrace to our political process and is a great example of why the GOP never should have opened the door to their crazy tent.
He is an absolute disgrace to our political process and is a great example of why the GOP never should have opened the door to their crazy tent.
(7)
(0)
SSG Rafael R. Rodriguez Sr.
How do you like the deficeit now? How do you like transvestite s in the military?
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SSG Rafael R. Rodriguez Sr.
The deficit was raised far more by Trump’s silly billionaire tax cuts than by anything Biden did. Of course the costs to the economy of a global pandemic outweighs anything either of them could do.
As for the military allowing transgender people, I feel exactly the same as I did about allowing gay and lesbian people to serve; specifically I am in favor. If someone wants to serve and is physically and mentally able, then I appreciate their service.
Two of the best NCOs I have ever had the honor to serve with are homosexual, and I’d gladly serve with a transgender soldier long before I’d serve with a bigot.
The deficit was raised far more by Trump’s silly billionaire tax cuts than by anything Biden did. Of course the costs to the economy of a global pandemic outweighs anything either of them could do.
As for the military allowing transgender people, I feel exactly the same as I did about allowing gay and lesbian people to serve; specifically I am in favor. If someone wants to serve and is physically and mentally able, then I appreciate their service.
Two of the best NCOs I have ever had the honor to serve with are homosexual, and I’d gladly serve with a transgender soldier long before I’d serve with a bigot.
(0)
(0)
SSG Rafael R. Rodriguez Sr.
I don't agree. Obama and Biden have been bringing our country down. Other foreign leaders look at them as panties who let them get away with all sorts of stuff.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SSG Rafael R. Rodriguez Sr. welcome to my block list. I do t waste time on Big Lie believers and Trump worshippers.
Have a nice life.
Have a nice life.
(0)
(0)
A few thoughts:
- I am sure that North Korea does not have American best interests in mind when Kim Dong Un says anything let alone a US Presidential endorsement.
- The basic international norm is to not interfere in the internal politics of a sovereign nation. Granted this norm is routinely violated but it is a good rule to follow even for American politicians.
- To write that "there can be no clearer indicator of how un-American you are than to be endorsed by Kim Dong Un" shows a staggering ignorance of how the world works in general and how North Korea operates in particular.
- I am sure that North Korea does not have American best interests in mind when Kim Dong Un says anything let alone a US Presidential endorsement.
- The basic international norm is to not interfere in the internal politics of a sovereign nation. Granted this norm is routinely violated but it is a good rule to follow even for American politicians.
- To write that "there can be no clearer indicator of how un-American you are than to be endorsed by Kim Dong Un" shows a staggering ignorance of how the world works in general and how North Korea operates in particular.
(5)
(0)
LTC Stephen C.
Succinct and to the point, as always, COL Jason Smallfield, PMP, CFM, CM. Nicely done.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - What if the reason Trump won the Presidency was because 30% of the liberal vote went with Jill Stein instead of Clinton? IMO, that would be the end of the Democratic party as we know it. In the next election the Greens would have qualified for Federal matching funds and met the threshold to be included in the debates. It would be a whole new ballgame.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SSG (Join to see) - I disagree. The Green Party is a lot further left than the Democratic party, too far left to win a general election.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - What percentage of Democrats are likely closer to the platform of the Green Party than they are to the Democratic party? I believe the number is likely around 40%, add in around 20% of Independents and people who register as Green and your close to 20% of the electorate. The Democrats get to move to the center and stop pretending to be Liberal, the Republicans either fight for the middle ground or embrace the far right... assuming a significant percentage haven't defected to the Libertarian party.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - I agree with you that we need more viable parties, but the Democrats have always been a left-of-center party. The Green party takes extreme environmental and animal rights positions that most Democrats don't share, just like how Libertarians take anti-government positions that most Republicans don't share.
My point is that for 2016, it is too late for a viable candidate to run under a third party, and the best the Green or Libertarian party can do is spoil the Democratic or Republican nominee, respectively.
Ralph Nader gave the 2000 election to George W. Bush. Stein isn't popular enough to give the election to Trump, but Sanders (who never was a Democrat) might be.
Johnson isn't popular enough to give the election to Clinton, but had Mitt Romney decided to run, he would have been.
We will be left with a race between Clinton and Trump. The GOP, I think, will be slow in recovering either way and seriously has to address what party it wants to be. The days of the ultra-religious, the anti-taxers and the foreign policy hawks getting along are over.
The Democrats are also fractured, but I don't as badly. Most of the people Bernie brought in aren't Democrats, but independents. Clinton has still won millions more votes, and in states with closed (Democrat only primaries), she wins. That Sanders wins in open primaries clearly shows his support is not coming from Democrats.
After 2016 the Green Party likely will get a boost, as will the Libertarian party, but I doubt either will do more than gain a few house and senate seats for at least 16 or 20 years, if ever.
My point is that for 2016, it is too late for a viable candidate to run under a third party, and the best the Green or Libertarian party can do is spoil the Democratic or Republican nominee, respectively.
Ralph Nader gave the 2000 election to George W. Bush. Stein isn't popular enough to give the election to Trump, but Sanders (who never was a Democrat) might be.
Johnson isn't popular enough to give the election to Clinton, but had Mitt Romney decided to run, he would have been.
We will be left with a race between Clinton and Trump. The GOP, I think, will be slow in recovering either way and seriously has to address what party it wants to be. The days of the ultra-religious, the anti-taxers and the foreign policy hawks getting along are over.
The Democrats are also fractured, but I don't as badly. Most of the people Bernie brought in aren't Democrats, but independents. Clinton has still won millions more votes, and in states with closed (Democrat only primaries), she wins. That Sanders wins in open primaries clearly shows his support is not coming from Democrats.
After 2016 the Green Party likely will get a boost, as will the Libertarian party, but I doubt either will do more than gain a few house and senate seats for at least 16 or 20 years, if ever.
(0)
(0)
I never supported him in the first place, but the fact that Putin and Kim like him is not good.
(4)
(0)
SPC Rory J. Mattheisen
I personally believe Russia will drop the act very soon and publicly announce its return to Communism. Nothing really changed over there except the wrapping paper.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
SPC Rory J. Mattheisen - A lot changed, just not much of it is political. At least now those who own the country don't have to travel to buy luxury goods, and of course tourism is a great industry and it is facilitated by the presence of luxury hotels, high-end restaurants and of course shopping.
St. Petersburg and Vladivostok are actually on five year list of places I plan to visit.
St. Petersburg and Vladivostok are actually on five year list of places I plan to visit.
(0)
(0)
SPC(P) (Join to see)
And that's exactly what they want you to think, they fear Trump (I'm not a supporter either).
(0)
(0)
PFC Blake Hildebrand
I doubt that. Men who have served in any military are not fearful of those who haven't. They served and are now in power. Trump started out rich and maybe given power. Military personnel and veterans aren't sure arent scared of the rich and powerful.
(0)
(0)
I noted another idiotic rant by MAJ Andrew Fishkin, who feels free to comment, but blocks people so they can't respond.
He calls Trump a "narcissistic bully", but refuses to acknowledge that title belongs to Obama. Same for his comment about being a disgrace. This is why Liberals should be barred from holding public office.
He calls Trump a "narcissistic bully", but refuses to acknowledge that title belongs to Obama. Same for his comment about being a disgrace. This is why Liberals should be barred from holding public office.
(3)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
SPC Rory J. Mattheisen - Well, the down vote button is used for deliberate false statements. You stated "There is no truth in your statement" when in fact, The MAJ did exactly what the COL stated he did.
(1)
(0)
SPC Rory J. Mattheisen
That is not a statement, it is a passive aggressive attack. His statement followed and bears no truth.
Donald Trump is a Jackass, he has zero policy, zero experience, zero tact and is not even fit to run his own businesses.
Donald Trump is a Jackass, he has zero policy, zero experience, zero tact and is not even fit to run his own businesses.
(0)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
Statement, and true at that:
I noted another idiotic rant by MAJ Andrew Fishkin, who feels free to comment, but blocks people so they can't respond. He calls Trump a "narcissistic bully"
Opinion: but refuses to acknowledge that title belongs to Obama. Same for his comment about being a disgrace. This is why Liberals should be barred from holding public office.
and Opinion: Donald Trump is a Jackass, he has zero policy, zero experience, zero tact and is not even fit to run his own businesses.
It seems more and more that this overall post (by you) was just to stir the pot.
I noted another idiotic rant by MAJ Andrew Fishkin, who feels free to comment, but blocks people so they can't respond. He calls Trump a "narcissistic bully"
Opinion: but refuses to acknowledge that title belongs to Obama. Same for his comment about being a disgrace. This is why Liberals should be barred from holding public office.
and Opinion: Donald Trump is a Jackass, he has zero policy, zero experience, zero tact and is not even fit to run his own businesses.
It seems more and more that this overall post (by you) was just to stir the pot.
(1)
(0)
Is Kim Jong Un an American? No... Duh! Then how could you qualify anything he says an an endorsement for Trump. Only silly people talk silly things... Next?
(3)
(0)
SGT Roberto Mendoza-Diaz
SPC Rory J. Mattheisen - It doesn't matter... I endorse Trump too and so what? Anyone who voted for Trump it is technically endorsing him. Anyways enough with the silly talk... You sound just like Glenn Beck.
(1)
(0)
SGT Jerrold Pesz
Fact. Nowhere does the articles that I can find say that Kim endorsed anyone. The endorsement came from a Korea scholar based in China. However the writer is mostly correct in his opinions.
(0)
(0)
SGT Roberto Mendoza-Diaz
Kim Jung Un endorses Trump and everyone lose their minds... Hillary Clinton kills four Americans and no one bats an eye.
(1)
(0)
SGT Robert George
Right on Sgt Diaz how can anybody give consideration to what any foreigner has to say of this matter ???
(1)
(0)
My position hasn't changed at all .... my vote is for TRUMP 2016!!! I will never vote for "KILLARY"
(2)
(0)
Read This Next


Republicans
Politics
United States
Donald Trump
North Korea
