Posted on Feb 13, 2023
How is it justified to deduct VA Comp from DFAS retirement pay?
5.05K
30
17
3
3
0
How is it justified to deduct VA Comp from DFAS retirement pay??
Posted 2 y ago
Responses: 6
The primary reason that you have to give up retirement pay to receive the disability compensation is because Congress didn't want to come up with enough money to fully pay you for both. That's a cynical viewpoint, but it was the reality behind finally getting this up and running. In 2004, Congress finally agreed that concurrent receipt of retirement pay (for past service) and disability (for loss of future earnings) was the right thing to do, and they passed it into law. As they were writing the legislation, they ran the numbers to fully fund concurrent receipt, but the projected amount was too big. So, Congress drew the line at 50% as a means to keep the overall cost down. Anyone below 50% was hosed, and anyone 50% or above benefited by receiving both. Also, to help keep the cost down, they phased it in over 10 years.
Here are a couple of links to more information on the program:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10594/
Here are a couple of links to more information on the program:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10594/
(6)
(0)
If you are rated less than 50% disability, they will deduct from Retirement, happened to me, that is the rules. 50% or higher, you get to keep them both. No one likes it, but that is the VA rules, unless it get changes, which I do not see it happening.
(5)
(0)
COL Randall C.
TSgt (Join to see) - Why? Because of Title 38 (38 U.S. Code § 5305) says you can't get VA payments along with a military retirement.
Subsequently, when the Concurrent Receipt law (10 U.S. Code § 1414) was passed, the threshold was put at 50%.
Now, if your follow-up to that is "Why is that in law and not everything" my answer will be the redirect you to your local federal political representative.
-------------------------------------------------------
* https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/5305
* https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/1414
Subsequently, when the Concurrent Receipt law (10 U.S. Code § 1414) was passed, the threshold was put at 50%.
Now, if your follow-up to that is "Why is that in law and not everything" my answer will be the redirect you to your local federal political representative.
-------------------------------------------------------
* https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/5305
* https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/1414
(4)
(0)
SGM Mikel Dawson
TSgt (Join to see) - Yep, cost. Congress did not want to fund what it would cost for everyone rated a disability, so they set it at 50%. It's all about the money
(1)
(0)
Read This Next