How much do you think HRC/Big Army takes into account your job versus your evaluation?

For each branch/AOC/MOS, there are so many different varieties of jobs someone can hold. Being in the AMEDD, a part of the Army with so much diversity, I have seen this time and time again. I am currently a Battalion Medical Operations Officer for an infantry battalion. The battalion that I am in has a hard charging command group that is all prior Ranger Regiment guys. We get pushed hard and train hard with a fast op tempo. It is exhausting and was overwhelming at times I love my job and the people I work with. However, I cannot help but notice the other BN MEDOs or the PLs in the C-Med Company in the BSB with much less challenging jobs yet possibly getting the same/better evaluations due to senior rater profiles. I understand that the actual senior rater comments have a significant impact but I am sure many people take a quick glance at which box is checked.<div><br></div><div>Would you rather be "a big fish in a small pond" to stand out or we'll say "a stallion amongst stallions", working hard and developing a lot more professionally? No other medical service officer in my BDE wants to take my job, even though it has been time for me to leave due to the reputation my BN has for being the one that is in the field the most and is always working late/hard. I'm actually happy because I enjoy it.<div><br></div><div>In the next 1-2 years, I plan to go to RASP and on to Regiment. I feel like I will be in the same situation versus my peers in the big Army. So many of them are in units where the attitude is "it is 1600, why am I not off work yet? or I know we are in a field, but are we really going to work that weekend/DONSA?". Many of my peers will be leaving BCTs and heading to TDA positions (hospitals, clinics, ect...) where I may be in the field working around the clock potentially with Regiment. Thoughts or comments?</div></div>