Posted on Mar 29, 2018
SSG Jeffrey Leake
131K
2.92K
1.1K
477
477
0
3d6b7f13
CJ Grisham, President of Open Carry Texas, Army veteran and recent candidate for State Representative in District 55, along with a couple of other people was arrested yesterday in Olmos Park, TX (Bexar County). He was tazed and subsequently injured in that arrest with a head injury and was hospitalized. I was told that the head injury was a large gash on the back of the head. He also suffered numerous scrapes on his wrists and arms.

Grisham and crew were legally opening carrying pistols and long guns in response to an event last week when an Olmos Park police officer drew guns on and detained someone with a protest sign solely for the reason of open carrying a pistol (which turned out to be a training fake).

Grisham had a phone conversation with the Olmos Park Police Chief, Rene Valenciano about their policies, etc. in which the chief seemed entirely unconcerned with his officers illegally detaining people for a perfectly legal activity. (The conversation will be linked in the comments below).

Grisham and crew went to Olmos Park yesterday and were legally and peacefully open carrying and got arrested for it. There is a video of the arrest. There was no articulated probable cause for the arrest. The police showed up, including Chief Valenciano and ordered Grisham and his crew to the ground. Grisham at least refused. It was Valenciano that personally tazed and arrested Grisham.

Between the phone call and video from the site, it's very clear this was an illegal arrest by an oath breaking police officer and they will be held accountable.
Posted in these groups: Open carry logo Open Carry7c2cc64 Bexar County
Avatar feed
Responses: 432
SSG Robert Perrotto
0
0
0
The way I see it - right or wrong - we have private citizens openly disobeying an appointed law official - which resulted in a confrontation - there is a right way and a wrong way - and confronting police officers when you have firearms is not the smartest thing to do and you are lucky that no one was shot - you claim not to bow before tyranny - but what you did is not what the constitution is for - when the officer asked you to stand down you should have complied - as I tell troops on this site that going against your NCO's is a no win situation in the moment, even if the NCO was wrong - you comply, then utilize the open door policies - you 1SG are acting and behaving as a private and that confrontation has done more harm then good in the national arena for NRA and 2nd amendment advocates - you 1SG are that officer who is looking for personal glory at the expense of the overall mission, and his men. Had you complied and had the video supporting you, you would have had more people sympathetic to your cause - instead - you appear to be a radical, deliberately looking for confrontations and you WILL, not a matter of if, get someone shot or killed in these confrontations. As a second amendment advocate, I will at every opportunity, condemn you and your actions. This is not the way to effect change - there are and always will be other avenues then direct confrontations with law officers. Your phone the day before was an explicit call to challenge, and then you cry victim when they show up. sorry - not buying the bovine fecal matter that you espouse.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Capt David Bays
0
0
0
They both crossed the line. But Grisham and OTC crossed the line first. There was an ordinance that prohibited anyone other than a police officer from carrying a loaded rifle on public streets. Had Grisham complied with the lawful order enforcing the ordinance, he would have standing to sue to challenge the ordinance. Just because OTC believed the ordinance was unlawful, and even if they were right, that does not give them the right to ignore the police. He didn't comply and the police crossed the line and escalated the otherwise peaceful protest. And the police crossed another line trying to cover-up how they handled the situation. Even if the ordnance was unconstitutional, that does not make the order of the police trying to enforce the ordinance an unlawful order that can be ignored without consequence.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Dale Brown
0
0
0
They should be fired and prosecuted. Stupid can’t be fixed.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG (ret) William Martin
0
0
0
Someone is about to settle out of court.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Steven Depuy
0
0
0
I am tired of people demanding people get fired because they don't like something they said. The guy was making a joke. Was it a joke in bad taste, most likely. If he actually does something like that, put his ass in jail. But this crap is out of control.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 John Driskill
0
0
0
Did he have a DPS issued open carry permit? State law says you can legally open carry long guns not pistols unless you have an open carry license. He file a complaint with the State AG’s office in Austin for Offical Oppression and civil law suit the chief and the city.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPL Charles Yuditsky
0
0
0
If they keep this up they will find out what the French Revolution was like.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Kim Fergerson
0
0
0
It's very sad when we have a 1SG push his personal platform here on RP. This is NOT Facebook. To the original poster, what point does this serve to enlighten those of us who come to RP for current, past & future camaraderie & memories? I am not an attorney, I pursue law as a hobby only, but common sense says that if they (cops, anyone, etc) point a gun at u & ARE in a position of authority, u comply but state you ARE doing so under duress, LOUDLY & CLEARLY! All that better so it can be heard. 1SG, do it your way, but know this: we fought for our rights already, we know how much reverence the govt has for our services----that being zilch, & a dead ex-soldier can't protest a damn thing!!!!! Compliance doesn't mean culpable. It's safety in numbers & a chance to win in court & fight another day. Having said this, I will explain that I am totally for open carry but prefer concealed carry, as no thug can take a weapon they can't see! Also, as one who has a temper, I personally don't carry at all, because IF I snapped, there literally would be a blood bath, & innocents DO NOT deserve such. Me & my PTSD prefer peace. On top of all this, I have challenged cops verbally but there weren't pointing a gun at me, their request was stupid & illogical, & I wasn't carrying any weapon, nor did they have reason to arrest me----this involved a downed tree in my yard & 1 cop asking me not to view the fallen end of said tree! Stand if u feel u must, but laws r not made to be broken. They are made to be challenged, if unreasonable, or illegal, in court. I have a great brain & the soul of the patriot that I am but I have also NEVER needed to carry a firearm to prove my point. We aren't in combat, so as u were, 1SG. That's my 2 cents & I am entitled to such. I live in GA.
(0)
Comment
(0)
1SG Cj Grisham
1SG Cj Grisham
6 y
PFC Kim Fergerson Stop pushing your personal platform of opposing my personal platform. Did you serve or not? If so, you took an oath, did you not? Was that oath to defend the constitution of the United States or was it to preserve abusive police power? I can't help but wonder, PFC. If a cop came up to you and demanded that you drop your pants and bend over, would you ""comply but state you are doing so under duress, LOUDLY & CLEARLY" or would you refuse to comply?
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Kim Fergerson
PFC Kim Fergerson
6 y
Hey 1SG, my PTSD is from being raped by a drill sergeant, thank you! I did not calmly comply either, we were off post, & he had a good 75 lbs on me. Yep, ur welcome to my service, & I think ur a grand-stander for sure. Luckily, I don't trigger @ stupid stuff said by careless individuals. Leake, I didn't say 1SG posted it. I questioned why such would be relevant here in a non- Facebook environ. This is a FORUM, & I merely stated my opinion on the topic. I digress on occasion as I do have chronic pain from my PTSD, & that causes me to take side loops on occasion. Hey, buddy, I didn't ask for PTSD. I earned it from my service & if u didn't want to hear opinions, why post? Similarly, if u didn't care for my opinion, u might do the adult thing & just agree to disagree. U did answer my question, & I thank u for doing so. As for me stating I have PTSD, u mustn't know much about the condition. To be able to talk of it is a healing thing, bar none. I'm a hard charger & I drive on every day, a helluva a lot better than 2 fellas that got their panties in a knot because I don't agree with their opinion. Once ur not in the military, ur rank means dick, which is exactly what you & the first shirts opinions mean to me, but y'all have fun, ya hear?
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Squad Leader
SSG (Join to see)
6 y
PFC Kim Fergerson - this is very common on RP for people to push there own view on things about really any topic. If you disagree about something or you have a different view about it then come with your view point but he is allowed to have his view point and this is a place to share ideas and opinions respectfully even if we don't agree with the other person.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PFC Kim Fergerson
PFC Kim Fergerson
6 y
SSG Matthew H, I now understand that & I thank u for the explanation. So be it. However, I do find it interesting that my opinion was similar to others, tho more bluntly stated, & I seem to be the only one that stuck in their craw. I wasn't aware that lack of tact might get me in hot water here just because I am a very blunt person. Be that as it may, I rarely comment on RP, I did on this issue, it ruffled some feathers, & I will continue to be who I am :). Good day & thanks!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Louis Alexander
0
0
0
Alert all the Veteran groups in Texas and the surrounding states, I’m sure a minimal of 700 is foreseen and would join a peaceful march in protest. If you get others involved the Governor has to launch an investigation. Remember, The Governor is like the president they serve at the will of the American people, not the other way around. Something the Mayor of Olmos Park had better learn fast. One thing sticks in my head. Those policemen who approached Grisham appeared to be Mexican or of Mexican heritage. My question would be first; are they “Legal” US American citizens? Second: Are they certified by the State Police Academy? Thirdly: Could it possibly be a case of reverse discrimination, being they were Brown skinned, Mexican looking using their authority as a basis for racism discrimination towards white people while holding a badge and working in law enforcement? Something I’d have my Cop hating liberal attorney look into.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Carlos Madden
0
0
0
What is your specific question?
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Jeffrey Leake
SSG Jeffrey Leake
6 y
Did he specifically go out and see if he could cause a altercation with the Police? Did the Chief over react?
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPT Clay Autery
CPT Clay Autery
6 y
1) No.
2) Yes.
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close