Posted on Jun 16, 2015
"If U.S. Military Spending Returned to 2001 Level"
7.87K
5
5
2
2
0
Originally published on ieet.org:
--
In 2001, U.S. military spending was $397 billion, from which it soared to a peak of $720 billion in 2010, and is now at $610 billion in 2015.
These figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (in constant 2011 dollars) exclude debt payments, veterans costs, and civil defense, which raise the figure to over $1 trillion a year now, not counting state and local spending on the military.
Military spending is now 54% of U.S. federal discretionary spending according to the National Priorities Project. Everything else—and the entire debate in which liberals want more spending and conservatives want less!—is contained within the other 46% of the budget.
U.S. military spending, according to SIPRI, is 35% of the world total. U.S. and Europe make 56% of the world. The U.S. and its allies around the globe (it has troops in 175 countries, and most countries are armed in great part by U.S. companies) make up the bulk of world spending.
Iran spends 0.65% of world military spending (as of 2012, the last year available). China’s military spending has been rising for years and has soared since 2008 and the U.S. pivot to Asia, from $107 billion in 2008 to now $216 billion. But that’s still just 12% of world spending.
Per capita the U.S. now spends $1,891 current U.S. dollars for each person in the United States, as compared with $242 per capita worldwide, or $165 per capita in the world outside the U.S., or $155 per capita in China.
The dramatically increased U.S. military spending has not made the U.S. or the world safer. Early on in the “war on terror” the U.S. government ceased reporting on terrorism, as it increased. The Global Terrorism Index records a steady increase in terrorist attacks from 2001 to the present.
A Gallup poll in 65 nations at the end of 2013 found the United States overwhelmingly viewed as the greatest threat to peace in the world. Iraq has been turned into hell, with Libya, Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia close behind. Newly embittered terrorist groups have arisen in direct response to U.S. terrorism and the devastation it’s left behind. And arms races have been sparked that benefit only the arms dealers.
But the spending has had other consequences. The U.S. has risen into the top five nations in the world for disparity of wealth. The 10th wealthiest country on earth per capita doesn’t look wealthy when you drive through it. And you do have to drive, with 0 miles of high-speed rail built; but local U.S. police have weapons of war now. And you have to be careful when you drive. The American Society of Civil Engineers gives U.S. infrastructure a D+. Areas of cities like Detroit have become wasteland. Residential areas lack water or are poisoned by environmental pollution—most often from military operations.
The U.S. now ranks 35th in freedom to choose what to do with your life, 36th in life expectancy, 47th in preventing infant mortality, 57th in employment, and trails in education by various measures.
If U.S. military spending were merely returned to 2001 levels, the savings of $213 billion per year could meet the following needs:
End hunger and starvation worldwide—$30 billion per year.
Provide clean drinking water worldwide—$11 billion per year.
Provide free college in the United States—$70 billion per year (according to Senate legislation).
Double U.S. foreign aid—$23 billion per year.
Build and maintain a high-speed rail system in the U.S.—$30 billion per year.
Invest in solar and renewable energy as never before—$20 billion per year.
Fund peace initiatives as never before—$10 billion per year.
That would leave $19 billion left over per year with which to pay down debt.
You may say I’m a dreamer, but this is life and death. War kills more by how the money isn’t spent than by how it is spent.
http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/swanson20150612
--
In 2001, U.S. military spending was $397 billion, from which it soared to a peak of $720 billion in 2010, and is now at $610 billion in 2015.
These figures from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (in constant 2011 dollars) exclude debt payments, veterans costs, and civil defense, which raise the figure to over $1 trillion a year now, not counting state and local spending on the military.
Military spending is now 54% of U.S. federal discretionary spending according to the National Priorities Project. Everything else—and the entire debate in which liberals want more spending and conservatives want less!—is contained within the other 46% of the budget.
U.S. military spending, according to SIPRI, is 35% of the world total. U.S. and Europe make 56% of the world. The U.S. and its allies around the globe (it has troops in 175 countries, and most countries are armed in great part by U.S. companies) make up the bulk of world spending.
Iran spends 0.65% of world military spending (as of 2012, the last year available). China’s military spending has been rising for years and has soared since 2008 and the U.S. pivot to Asia, from $107 billion in 2008 to now $216 billion. But that’s still just 12% of world spending.
Per capita the U.S. now spends $1,891 current U.S. dollars for each person in the United States, as compared with $242 per capita worldwide, or $165 per capita in the world outside the U.S., or $155 per capita in China.
The dramatically increased U.S. military spending has not made the U.S. or the world safer. Early on in the “war on terror” the U.S. government ceased reporting on terrorism, as it increased. The Global Terrorism Index records a steady increase in terrorist attacks from 2001 to the present.
A Gallup poll in 65 nations at the end of 2013 found the United States overwhelmingly viewed as the greatest threat to peace in the world. Iraq has been turned into hell, with Libya, Afghanistan, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia close behind. Newly embittered terrorist groups have arisen in direct response to U.S. terrorism and the devastation it’s left behind. And arms races have been sparked that benefit only the arms dealers.
But the spending has had other consequences. The U.S. has risen into the top five nations in the world for disparity of wealth. The 10th wealthiest country on earth per capita doesn’t look wealthy when you drive through it. And you do have to drive, with 0 miles of high-speed rail built; but local U.S. police have weapons of war now. And you have to be careful when you drive. The American Society of Civil Engineers gives U.S. infrastructure a D+. Areas of cities like Detroit have become wasteland. Residential areas lack water or are poisoned by environmental pollution—most often from military operations.
The U.S. now ranks 35th in freedom to choose what to do with your life, 36th in life expectancy, 47th in preventing infant mortality, 57th in employment, and trails in education by various measures.
If U.S. military spending were merely returned to 2001 levels, the savings of $213 billion per year could meet the following needs:
End hunger and starvation worldwide—$30 billion per year.
Provide clean drinking water worldwide—$11 billion per year.
Provide free college in the United States—$70 billion per year (according to Senate legislation).
Double U.S. foreign aid—$23 billion per year.
Build and maintain a high-speed rail system in the U.S.—$30 billion per year.
Invest in solar and renewable energy as never before—$20 billion per year.
Fund peace initiatives as never before—$10 billion per year.
That would leave $19 billion left over per year with which to pay down debt.
You may say I’m a dreamer, but this is life and death. War kills more by how the money isn’t spent than by how it is spent.
http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/swanson20150612
Posted in these groups: 
Budget
Budget
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
3
3
0
Alrighty... let's do some point-by-points..
End hunger and starvation worldwide—$30 billion per year.
- Hunger issues are a result of logistics, not lack of food. We have an inability to deliver resources, not an inability to have them.
Provide clean drinking water worldwide—$11 billion per year.
- Per hunger. Plenty of clean drinking water in the world. Hard to deliver it. This figure is misleading, unless someone thinks we can complete infrastructure in all of Africa for $41B
Provide free college in the United States—$70 billion per year (according to Senate legislation).
- In fall of 2014 there were estimated 21M college students. Using simple math this would imply that each student would only need $3333~ of tuition per year. The math doesn't "jive."
Double U.S. foreign aid—$23 billion per year.
- Doubling something doesn't necessarily make it better. I can double my water bill (about $30/month), which wouldn't necessarily result in more return.
Build and maintain a high-speed rail system in the U.S.—$30 billion per year.
- We have a low speed raid system which moves a lot of gear, but Americans don't really care about rail. What's the actual return on this?
Invest in solar and renewable energy as never before—$20 billion per year.
- We can invest in Clown Colleges as never before as well!
Fund peace initiatives as never before—$10 billion per year.
- Technically we have been funding "peace initiatives" as never before! to the tune of $720B!
End hunger and starvation worldwide—$30 billion per year.
- Hunger issues are a result of logistics, not lack of food. We have an inability to deliver resources, not an inability to have them.
Provide clean drinking water worldwide—$11 billion per year.
- Per hunger. Plenty of clean drinking water in the world. Hard to deliver it. This figure is misleading, unless someone thinks we can complete infrastructure in all of Africa for $41B
Provide free college in the United States—$70 billion per year (according to Senate legislation).
- In fall of 2014 there were estimated 21M college students. Using simple math this would imply that each student would only need $3333~ of tuition per year. The math doesn't "jive."
Double U.S. foreign aid—$23 billion per year.
- Doubling something doesn't necessarily make it better. I can double my water bill (about $30/month), which wouldn't necessarily result in more return.
Build and maintain a high-speed rail system in the U.S.—$30 billion per year.
- We have a low speed raid system which moves a lot of gear, but Americans don't really care about rail. What's the actual return on this?
Invest in solar and renewable energy as never before—$20 billion per year.
- We can invest in Clown Colleges as never before as well!
Fund peace initiatives as never before—$10 billion per year.
- Technically we have been funding "peace initiatives" as never before! to the tune of $720B!
(3)
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
SSG David Girr We do have plenty of food & water on planet Earth. Hunger & Starvation is not a product of population & resource allocation. It is a product of distribution limitations, a.k.a. infrastructure (roads and logistical capabilities). In other words actually getting said resource to those who need it.
As for the renewable energy analogy, I was mocking the "invest as never before!" tag line, not the renewable energy. I'm pro-renewable energy. I'm anti using misleading verbiage to do it.
As for studying society, technology, and understanding the position the planet is in? Yes I have, and do. And I mock articles like this for emotional calls that lack both fact and logic. If we could invest $41B and solve World Hunger, we'd have philanthropists like B. Gates doing that instead of curing Malaria.
As for the renewable energy analogy, I was mocking the "invest as never before!" tag line, not the renewable energy. I'm pro-renewable energy. I'm anti using misleading verbiage to do it.
As for studying society, technology, and understanding the position the planet is in? Yes I have, and do. And I mock articles like this for emotional calls that lack both fact and logic. If we could invest $41B and solve World Hunger, we'd have philanthropists like B. Gates doing that instead of curing Malaria.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Was it the U.S. That drew the middle eastern state's border lines after WWI that disregarded religious and tribal loyalties ? I forgot .
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
" Residential areas lack water or are poisoned by environmental pollution—most often from military operations" I would LOVE to see the reference material that supports this claim.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google