NOTE: This is directed at V, R, and C, and SM are advised to NOT COMMENT on this discussion.
http://reagancoalition.com/articles/2015/u-s-military-generals-constitutional-crisis-could-force-military-to-remove-obama.html
Sharia Advisors – Barack Obama’s Muslim Appointees in High Security Positions
Just how does one even begin to understand how the President would place people into positions that seem like placing the proverbial Fox in the Chicken Coop? Barack Obama has placed individuals who…
It is interesting to note that Mossad was one of the agencies giving ISIS weapons. Usually far right articles do not mention that. Support of the extremist organizations signals that Obama is not a true Muslim, because these people defile the name of Islam for their own personal economic and political gain. Arming and equipping extremist organizations is something that has been seen routinely throughout American history. In the middle east, Reagan gave the Taliban all kinds of dangerous weapons. Some of which may still be used against American soldiers today. Clinton refused to act on intelligence that could have killed bin Laden in the early days. Obama has been air dropping materials and supplies regardless of who gets them, I believe, because he is not interested in a peaceful conclusion to the Syrian civil war as much as he is interested in clearing out the Syrian presidential seat.
Taqiyya is not an Islamic principle either. It's more in line with Mossad's motto- "War through deception." It is very common for those who spend the majority of their lives working in South Asia or MENA posts to convert to Islam after truly learning Islam. This is nothing to be concerned about, but if Brennan is a Wahhabist then he is not a Muslim at all.
We can agree that a lot of mistakes were made on both sides of the aisle arming those who would be our enemies. And we both agree that Obama is not seeking to destroy ISIS, which is the greatest threat in that region right now. I believe Iran is a close 2nd. They have publicly stated their intentions of destroying Israel and wiping it off the map.
Taqiyya IS an Islamic principle. It comes from the Qu'ran. Does your Qu'ran not mention it? Wahabbi is a branch of Sunni Muslim, and they are a bit more extreme in their literal interpretation of the Qu'ran, and the jihad it advocates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_schools_and_branches#Wahhabism
Islamic schools and branches - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article summarizes the different branches and various types of schools in Islam. There are three types of schools in Islam: Schools of Islamic jurisprudence, Islamic schools of Sufism better known as Tasawwufī-tārīqat and Aqidah schools of Islamic divinity. While all branches recognize the Qur'an, they differ in which other authorities they acknowledge.
The Constitution also clearly defines the process through which a President, through "high crimes and misdemeanors" may be removed from office. Any other method of doing so is not Constitutional and I would take up arms to support and defend it, against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Likewise, I guarantee you that the Socialists that call themselves Democrats would not be coming to you giving you this order, nor would the Establishment GOP bureaucrats that vote with the Democrats. It would be a small faction. Guys like Sen Jeff Sessions, Sen Ted Cruz, Sen Mike Bell, Congressman Trey Gowdy, Congressman Louie Gohmert, etc.
And for the sake of argument, let's say they laid it out and said, "Hey General, we need your help because this corruption has taken hold of 2/3 of Congress. We ask that you remove the President from office along with Valerie Jarrett, the Attorney General, two Supreme Court justices, four Senators, and six Congressmen that were the ringleaders. Both parties are involved in this. The Speaker of the House will assume the duties in the interim until a special election is held."
They then lay out before you clear evidence of all that the President has been doing in secret to undermine this country and its Constitution, and they provide you with the names of those in Congress who are in on it... on both sides of the aisle. Their purpose is simply to ferret out the corruption. Note that this is not an attempt to remove the other party. They feel that by getting rid of the ringleaders, that those they coerced will be able to return to their duties and resume their duties free of the threats used to coerce them and free of the fear of reprisal. They don't want the military to run the country; they just want help removing those individuals from office and to ensure that Security is in place while they investigate and bring said individuals to trial. They also request assistance in quelling any riots and public disturbances while this takes place and promise to hold elections immediately to replace those convicted. And let's say the evidence they present to you is rock solid and overwhelming. Would you help them?
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
US National Debt Clock : Real Time U.S. National Debt Clock
14 reasons why this is the worst Congress ever
Hating on congress is a beloved American tradition. Hence Mark Twain's old joke, “Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.” But the 112th Congress is no ordinary congress. It’s a very bad, no good, terrible Congress. It is, in fact, one of the very worst congresses we have ever had.
My question is more along the lines of: "Our elected government is so permeated with corruption [in all three branches!], that those we elect can't fight it. Instead, they get steamrolled by their corrupted colleagues who don't want to see the status quo changed from what it is, and the entire system is broken. As if that weren't bad enough, they are allowing outsiders to craft legislation which they don't bother to read and sign off on. Their personal ambitions and party interests trump America's best interest, which they are sworn to uphold. They have shirked their duty to rid government of corruption and they sit on their hands while those we elected shred the Constitution and reinterpret it to suit their fancy. Should we as the nation's military do something and intervene to rid Congress of those who are sold out, or do we sit on the sidelines and watch our country implode under the weight of its own corruption? Would military intervention be justified after all other means have failed to restore integrity in our leadership and get the nation back on track with the vision our Founding Fathers had for this nation?"