Posted on Apr 30, 2014
MAJ Deputy Director, Combat Casualty Care Research Program
55.8K
85
68
5
5
0
13c28546
I didn't learn until after leaving Afghanistan that some units were being awarded CABs for indirect rocket attacks if the rocket landed within 300ft of them. I was even told that a COL got CABs for just bout everyone in barracks at Bagram because a rocket landed outside. I had at least 1 rocket land very close to me - close enough to feel the concussive wave - but I never felt it would be appropriate to put in for a CAB for simply being at the wrong place at the wrong time. Seems to me that the point of the CAB/CIB is that you were directly engaged with the enemy.
Posted in these groups: Air combat art 0134 CombatUs medals AwardsHqdefault Badges
Avatar feed
Responses: 23
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
1
1
0
With everyone saying that indirect fire shouldn't count for awarding of the CAB/CIB and that direct fire should always be the case. Then, someone please explain how all these General Officers have the CAB. I was at Basra, and we got mortared/rocketed practically on a weekly basis. One attack, round landed about 200 yrds away. Hell, when we first got into country, within 3 hrs of being at Tallil, we got hit. A round there hit pretty damn close (less than 100 yds). Yet, the lovely standards that the medical task force set forth was that in order to get the CAB, one had to have: 3 sworn statements, drawn strip map of locations of impacts and your location, pictures of the impact and where your location was. And then they all had to be submitted onto the SIPRNET for consideration. Basically, I got the experience the thrill of 46 attacks. If I don't meet the criteria, then how do these General Officers do?
(1)
Comment
(0)
SSG Christopher Wheeler
SSG Christopher Wheeler
>1 y
MSG, were you with 34th ID at Basrah in 2009-2010?
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Christopher Wheeler - I was at Basra 10-11 with the 200th Preventive Medicine. My "office" was in the ASMC ran by the medical element of the the 36th ID.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Christopher Wheeler
SSG Christopher Wheeler
>1 y
MSG (Join to see) copy, I think 1ID RIP-TOA after us and 36ID (TX) after that.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
MSG (Join to see)
>1 y
SSG Christopher Wheeler - Yep. When I got there, it was DHHB, 1st ID in charge of the base. Then, about 2 months later (I think) 36th took over.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Melvin Brandenburg
0
0
0
Was fire returned? Was the enemy engaged? I think you have to engage the enemy before either the CAB or CIB are awarded. It's best to check the regulations on that one.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Harry Herres
0
0
0
Sorry, what is a combat action badge. Guess that came after Nam. Otherwise 1.5 million would have it.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC David Willis
0
0
0
I guess technically it would. Think of it this way, if that mortar took off a leg, he would get a purple heart right?
(0)
Comment
(0)
COL All Source Intelligence
COL (Join to see)
4 y
According to the Regulation = Yes to Purple Heart. No to CAB.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG John Morgan
0
0
0
One must remember,the C.I.B During WW2 was VERY controversial too.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear Operations Specialist
0
0
0
The army messed up when they didn't use the same language as the marine combat action ribbon. For the CAR it pretty much says you need to be shot at by the enemy and return fire. The CAB doesn't have that kind of language.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Infantryman
SSG (Join to see)
5 y
And it doesn't need it. The enemy firing rockets and mortars on your position is combat. You can't engage something that you can't see or is beyond the range of your weapon. What the Marines do is their business. The CAB is not designed to be like that and it recognizes those that serve in non-infantry positions who are engaged by the enemy. The great thing is that the soldier doesn't have to wear or accept being put in for one if they feel they didn't earn it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
COL All Source Intelligence
COL (Join to see)
4 y
AR 600-8-22 does clearly define the requirements for the CAB - "Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient; the (Soldier) must have engaged or been (personally) engaged by the enemy." The CAB is supposed to "recognize the greatly expanded role of non-infantry Soldiers in active, ground combat." Active, Ground Combat is defined as "being personally present, under fire, and engaging in action against the enemy in ground forces combat. It is not awarded for battle participation credit."
Now whether the recommender and the approver actually follow that level of requirement or not, well that is clearly another story. However, the requirements are pretty clear.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Tom Monahan
0
0
0
You've got to understand history. The CIB was one of the baby blue trinkets to retain and recruit infantrymen starting in 1943. The CAB does the same for other branches.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Public Affairs Officer
0
0
0
This has been happening since the CAB came into being back in 05. I know of people who had a CAB retroactively awarded for IDF incidents in 03 and 04.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG John Morgan
SSG John Morgan
8 y
Yes Sir.Retroactive back to third week of September 2001 I believe.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Libby S
0
0
0
Does it count if you can see the the earth form a flume and a boom?
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG (ret) William Martin
0
0
0
I never got mine. I really don't care about it either.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close