Posted on Jun 8, 2016
Is there any logical reason why the unit requires soldiers to take a weekly PT test when they are 90 days out from any school?
49.9K
72
74
6
6
0
I'm not complaining about doing it, but im trying to see this from the BDE CSM's pov. Why does he think that all soldiers that are going to ANY school must take a weekly PT test. I could see if if the soldiers were borderline, but regardless of your score we still need to take a new test every week followed by height/weight right after.
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 39
It's because of the rate of soldiers that have slid through the cracks and made it to schools over weight and physically not fit. That reflects back on the chain of command and big Army see's this and all parties concerned come under fire for sending a soldier whi is unable to meet the standard to graduate that school.
(0)
(0)
When you become a company 1SG some day, you will realize just how important this will be to keep the BDE CSM off your ass. To many service members are taking slots that go wasted for soldiers failing PT Test's and the slot at the school goes unfilled. Waste of budget dollars and to the rest of the soldiers that didn't get in who can pass there APFT. Always has been an issue.
(0)
(0)
We had a policy that you would take a company/battery/troop APFT. If you passed it, you'd take one at the battalion/squadron level, and a final one would be administered by brigade/regiment. This was mandatory to be authorized for school. There were thresholds in place which constituted a retest as well (e.g. have to be at least 2% away from body fat requirements).
It worked pretty well, because in-school failures for PT pretty much disappeared (a few came up, but it was far and few between).
This wasn't extreme in my opinion for much of the reasons already stated. An APFT should be an easy morning.
It worked pretty well, because in-school failures for PT pretty much disappeared (a few came up, but it was far and few between).
This wasn't extreme in my opinion for much of the reasons already stated. An APFT should be an easy morning.
(0)
(0)
I think units should place more of an emphasis on obtaining a Master Fitness Instructor within its ranks to deal with these issues on a more educated level. Rather than constantly using the APFT to train for an APFT.
(0)
(0)
I see how it could seem like a lot of pain retesting a Soldier until they leave for a school. Ideally, I think leadership test a potential Soldier is because those slots are so vital. If a unit decides to approve a school request and a Soldier for example flunks the APFT. Not only will they probably lose a slot, but it also looks bad on the unit and Soldier. The basic prerequisites of attending a School, is to be physically fit. And to take a risk on a Soldier by assuming a Soldier is in shape, is a risk most units will not take. So they constantly test you to avoid any embarrassment of you not being physically capable. Also by testing you, I think it helps to correct any weaknesses you have in completing the test. Maybe you're a weak runner or you constantly fail PUs or SUs. I've seen where a Soldier was preparing for an NCOES school and he never could pass the run or he was always borderline. His unit gave him a weekly APFT and he steadily improved. Just my opinion though. Good post!
(0)
(0)
The CSM or higher leaders have probably been burned by Soldiers being certified by the unit and failing to meet the admission PRT/APFT for their NCOA course, Airborne School or other military school requiring the Soldier to take one upon arrival.
(0)
(0)
You can be given an APFT at anytime to see where the Soldier is, and it's good practice. The more you do something the better you get at it. So when it is time for a record APFT/School you are prepared.
(0)
(0)
When slots are at a premium for NCOES it only makes sense that a unit send those that can meet the standards, in my day many Soldiers were booted from schools for failing APFT's and SUDDENLY not making tape. All those wasted slots and that's what they are WASTED could have gone to Soldiers that could have made the standards. I don't know about weekly testing though, as I see it there is a chance to injure a Soldier whop scores well on APFT's if you make them take it weekly but that's a risk assessment issue. I got burned twice by Soldiers getting sent back and I made sure it didn't happen again, before I retired it was a big deal that could lead to repercussions from higher and a case of the ass from me.
(0)
(0)
I can understand the "Backlash" from in school APRT failure. Why make those that are not borderline to failure do that? Maybe by the time they arrive at their school they will fail being burnt out from all the APRT testing. My .2.
(0)
(0)
Personally I have no issue with this. It's not a trust issue nor is it toxic or micromanaging. You want to "deploy" to a school? Freaking keep yourself in optimal shape and be ready to meet the Standards every week. Unless you are shamed into MAXing it, then just do what you gotta do and quitcherbitchin'.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next


Physical Training
APFT
PFT
