Your Response was posted! Click here to see it.
Posted on Jun 30, 2015
PVT Infantryman
8.26K
98
85
6
5
1
There has been a lot of movement in two opposite, conflicting directions. On the one hand we now have legalized gay marriage, and on the other a growing movement to adopt Sharia Law in the US. On the surface they don't really seem to have anything to do with one another. I mean, we should be equally tolerant of muslims and homosexuals. Right?

Unfortunately for both groups there are some real dilemmas coming. For example: Will mosques and imams be required to perform same-sex marriages in the same way that Christian churches and pastors will be? A recent study determined that 51% of muslims living in this country support the adoption of Sharia Law. Islam and Sharia Law isn't too friendly toward homosexuals, and it has been widely reported for throwing gay men from rooftops among other things.

How are these two groups going to coexist in a country where acceptance of gay marriage has been institutionalized and many Congressional representatives and other government officials advocate for institutional acceptance of Sharia Law?

Also up for discussion is the "war on women" and sharia law in the US. How do these two groups coexist with opposing viewpoints on the role of women in society?

*edited for accuracy
Posted in these groups: Islam logo Islam4bfee3b LGBTQ+
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 20
LTC Bink Romanick
5
5
0
516deae8
(5)
Comment
(0)
SFC Rollie Hubbard
SFC Rollie Hubbard
>1 y
I hate to say it but yes I think we are.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
Oh! It seems you thought I was complimenting you. How clumsy of me! Now where did I put my sarcasm font....?
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Bink Romanick
LTC Bink Romanick
>1 y
I can tell you where to put it!
(3)
Reply
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
LTC Bink Romanick I'd like to invite you to unfollow the discussion, or regoup and knock off the passive-aggressive nonsense.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Maj Mike Sciales
3
3
0
Relax. Sharia law is no different than any other religious law, like keeping kosher. It can only apply to willing participants - like being on "The People's Court." There is a thing in law called "comity" or an agreement to recognize legal orders from foreign jurisdictions, giving them "full faith and credit." So an order from a New Jersey court will be recognized in Florida and an order from England or Saudi Arabia likewise. However, this is not unlimited and must be a lawful order - like child support, not sending a woman back for genital mutilation or beheading. People need to understand, the law isn't stupid or silly. Feel better now?
(3)
Comment
(0)
Maj Mike Sciales
Maj Mike Sciales
>1 y
Ever been to Milbrae, CA, near the San Francisco airport ? Pretty much been taken over by Chinese immigrants. Private banks, lots of businesses where only Chinese is spoken. This is a typical immigrant pattern - people move to where others like them live. It eases the transition. Now we all know the Chinese hack us, steal secrets, make crap products and generally do not operate in our best interests. So are they a menace or do they get a pass because nobody cares as long as they aren't Muslim?

My point is people are always afraid of strangers and their strange ways - Xenophobia- Greek for fear of strangers. The easiest way to overcome that fear is go talk to some of whatever group it is you are worried about. Go visit a mosque and talk to the preacher. Ask your questions about Sharia. Satisfy yourself by getting first hand information.

There are about 1 billion Muslims in the world. Daesh (ISIS) might have 50,000 members, a very small percentage - but if they can drive a wedge, sew hate and discontent amongst friends, well then they can win. We must fight ignorance.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
Maj Mike Sciales There is a huge difference between an irrational fear of strangers and seeing things for what they are. Houston has a pretty significant Vietnamese population. In fact there are places around town where there is a lot of signage in Vietnamese. The difference is that they aren't guarding their compounds with rifles and demanding to use Vietnamese tribunals in lieu of American courts. Nor do they call for jihad. Making moral equivalents out of dissimilar situations insults both our intelligence.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
SGT Efaw (Mick) G. And there are people preaching violence against whites. Just do a google search of Malik Zulu Shabazz and Louis Farrakhan. The difference is that white supremacists don't have nearly the following or sympathizers because most people are more sensible than that.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Ahmed Faried
CPT Ahmed Faried
>1 y
Clealry you have an agenda against Muslims and I get that. It is your right to be ignorant and live in world full of fear of the "other" but just come out and say that. Your allusions to ridiculous "what ifs" and clearly non-factual examples are just an attempt to hide that view. How many muslims do you personally know? It is easy to fear something and thing the worse of it unless you are familiar with it. Go to your local mosque if there is one and speak to the Imam, I assure you, you won't come out with an insatiable urge to bomb people and inanimate objects. But I guarantee you your fears will be gone. Take a knee, get some fresh air SFC Lyden. The world isn't so scary.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Ben Keen
3
3
0
Where do you see a movement to adopt Sharia law within the US?
(3)
Comment
(0)
Maj Mike Sciales
Maj Mike Sciales
>1 y
I haven't seen any move towards "Sharia" except for people trying to get bibles in the classroom as a legitimate text book. Why not the Qu'uran? Let in one, let in all.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
PVT (Join to see) - I just don't agree with saying that because homosexuals are given the right to marry that now we are going to see some religious law take hold in the country. Every religion has a set of church laws, in the United Methodist Church they call them Cannons. These are rules that govern the church and the people that work for the church. As a minister, my father is bond to follow these rules when making decisions for the church. They do not impact us in any other way but to say what my dad can and cannot do in his official role as a representative of the church.

Sharia is along the same lines. You are not going to see the Bill of Rights or the Constitution thrown aside and replaced by one religion's rules. As I was staying yesterday, please people, take a deep breath. The sky is not falling. The horseman are not riding down from the clouds because now Same Sex Marriage is ruled as being legal by the Supreme Court. You can continue to live as you been living. The government is coming to take your guns or your right to say what you want to say. It's amazing to look back at history, every time a group was given the ability to pratice rights that others have had such as voting, working, using a bathroom that wasn't 20 feet outside the front door, or whatever other rights this country has eventually opened up to other groups; there are people that will jump up and start screaming. Using fear based methods to try and explain how the new change is bad when in reality the change is just one more step to equality. The same equality that we all fought for during our time in the service.
(1)
Reply
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
SGT Ben Keen Look, I couln't care less if gay people want to get married. I don't think the decision needed to be taken away from the states. And, there's no need to try to marginalize me by condescension and mocking with the whole "sky's not falling, horsemen...etc." Years ago nobody wanted to believe the gov't was monitoring all electronic communication. Now it's not only common knowledge, but we act as if it's normal. I'm not trying to scare people. What I am trying to do is make an observation that our society seems to be embracing two groups and their agendas that are likely to be on a collision course. And Sharia law in not along the same lines as other religious law. It is not compatible with our system of justice or societal norms. See the article I posted below - Islam: Governing under sharia.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Ben Keen
SGT Ben Keen
>1 y
PVT (Join to see) - My apologizes, I was not trying to single you out or mock you. I was merely commenting on the ways some people are taking it to a level that it really doesn't need to go. Some people, either on the national news, radio, blogs, or on the streets are just acting as though this is the first time anything has ever changed. I guess my frustration with people's lack of an educated response just bubbled over and again I didn't mean to mock you or to reduce your point in any way. We all know this debate will echo in the halls for weeks, months and years to come but I'm sure the same thing happened with all the other changes the country has gone through.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Sharia law vs. gay rights. Is our country headed for a conflict?
CPT Ahmed Faried
2
2
0
..." and on the other a growing movement to adopt Sharia Law in the US. "
Interesting premise which I won't take at face value. Can you source this? Fox News deosn't count.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
CPT Ahmed Faried Read the entire thread. FoxNews counts just as much as CNN, and way more than MSNBC.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Ahmed Faried
CPT Ahmed Faried
>1 y
Depends on your perspective. A person that sees all muslims as so scary like you is more likely to favor Fox News.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
CPT Ahmed Faried I don't see them as scary. People like you always resort to ad hominem attacks when you're faced with people who disagree with you. A tactic used to marginalize someone, and therefore their side of the debate, before the debate even begins. I could just as easily say something unflattering about people who watch cnn or whatever your chosen source is, but that isn't productive to the conversation. You start out a conversation by automatically discounting a reputable news source because of your own personal bias. Sorry...I'm just not going to play that game. For the record - none of the sources I've cited here have come from Foxnews. But you would have known that had you taken the time to look at any of them. Information isn't scary captain. Go ahead and hold your opinion, but do so fully informed. Take a knee, get some fresh air, and read up a little bit.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Ahmed Faried
CPT Ahmed Faried
>1 y
Agreed perception depends on where we choose to get our news. You don't have to come out and say it in as many words foryour general opinion of muslims to be evident. It took me only a quick browse of your muslim-related reponses for that to be clear. Long weekend coming up, I intend to take that knee.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Instructor
2
2
0
Do you have any reputable sources? I'd especially like to see your support that "many congressional representatives and other government officials advocate for institutional acceptance of Sharia law."

I don't think there is a "growing movement to adopt Sharia law in the US," and Christian churches won't be required to perform same-sex weddings. If you "*edited for accuracy" then providing sources shouldn't be a problem.
(2)
Comment
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
LTC (Join to see) Presumptiveness seems to know no limits. The ridiculous part is that you are persistently avoiding the issue that there is a movement of people desiring to implement sharia law in our country. Whether it is acheived officially and sanctioned by the Constitution, courts and government, or it is acheived unofficially by calling it a religious tribunal. Follow the link below to see the definition of a tribunal.
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Instructor
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
Edit: Sorry, delusional may not be correct. What would it take for you to be comfortable that sharia will not take over the court system?
(0)
Reply
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
LTC (Join to see) It would be great to see ballot initiatives that allow residents of each state to decide whether or not they want to ban or allow sharia courts/muslim tribunals. But, once again, my comfort level isn't really addressing the original intent of this discussion thread. To restate: Given the opposing agendas of muslims and gays are they (and by extension, we) on a collision course if/when our court system rules that religious institutions and pastors may not refuse to perform gay weddings without risking their tax-exempt status or state licenses to marry?
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC Instructor
LTC (Join to see)
>1 y
It is not possible for states (or the federal government) to require religious institutions to perform same-sex weddings. RFRA and the First Amendment forbid it; although I think RFRA violates the First Amendment. I know it is unconstitutional to allow ballot initiatives to ban religious organizations. Imagine if a ballot initiative banned the Bible; what insanity would follow?!

Furthermore, sharia cannot become the law of the land.

Because of those two facts, there is no collision course, therefore no collision. Have some faith in the system, that is all I'm saying.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Geospatial Intelligence
2
2
0
It would seem, looking in from the outside. I wonder how long it will take people to notice the fact that those that follow extreme Sharia are throwing homosexuals off of buildings in the ME? I don't like the vortex that seems to be brewing.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Maj Mike Sciales
Maj Mike Sciales
>1 y
We can always find an example of somebody out of 7 billion people who will commit some horrible act. Hindus burn Muslims in India, or Christian Ugandans murdering homosexuals, or Christian Right to lifers shooting abortion doctors or Jewish Fundamentalists shooting up a Mosque in Israel, or an ISIS chopping off heads of anybody (Muslim or Christian or Jew) who isn't them. Don't confuse random acts you see repeated ad Nadeem over a 24 hour news cycle with the reality.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Brad Sand
1
1
0
Where are you seeing the move toward Sharia Law?

The two will not and cannot exist and it would be interesting if the two were growing in our Nation.

In truth, the wheels have come off the legal system in this Nation and the courts are now acting as political entities, something that is very bad for 'We the People' but no one seems to really care...another thing that is really bad.
(1)
Comment
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
MSG Brad Sand At the risk of sounding rude, please read through the thread for the links I've attached. In short: Judges have stricken down OK attempts to amend their state constitution to ban sharia law, Maxine Waters, D-CA, has recently stated her support for sharia law in the US, Muhammed Elibiary former adviser on DHS Security Council, muslim tribunal (sharia court) in Dallas TX, and a recent poll showing 51% of muslims in America preferring sharia law.

You're absolutely right that the two cannot coexist which is my original point. I'm wondering if the two are on a collision course because, eventually, I believe that churches are in danger of losing their tax-exempt status unless they conform to the new gay marriage law. I believe that there will come a day when courts will rule that refusing to perform a gay wedding will subject the pastor or church to litigation from gays wishing to drive the point home. If that happens then muslim mosques (as well as many Christian churches) will be pitted squarely against the gay agenda. Our society has gone to great lengths to accept and encourage both the gay and muslim agendas, but, again, they cannot coexist.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
>1 y
PVT (Join to see)

In our World, sounding rude probably means you are telling the truth.

In truth, I think I might prefer Sharia Law if our own courts are going to pervert the rule of law and undermine our Constitution? Additionally, these acts by the courts will drive people to something, so you may be correct but hopefully a bit early and 'We the People' are able to right our own ship...hopefully.

I do believe you are spot on with the coming attacks on churches because this what the LGBTQIA...I think it would be easier if they just put everyone but heterosexuals...community have stated they are going to do.

I fear the LGBTQIA community is making a fatal, and I do mean fatal, mistake if they link or push Christian into the Muslim camp because, while they follow the same God and can trace the same progenitor, the Christian faith is found on Christ and love. (I am not going to state the facts of Muslim foundation because of the haters)
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
2d Lt Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences Student
1
1
0
The fox news story you are referring to is misguided. A religious chapel can't be forced to do a wedding. A buisness owned by a minister can. Just as if they were black, white, Asian etc...
(1)
Comment
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
>1 y
2d Lt (Join to see)

So where are you going to side when they do start forcing pastors and priest to perform service because we already know this is coming because the LGBTQIA community has already stated this their plan? Additionally, trying to compare this to race questions is sign that you lack knowledge of the actual facts...which has been always a large part of the Progressive plan.
(0)
Reply
(0)
2d Lt Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences Student
2d Lt (Join to see)
>1 y
MSG Brad Sand,

I suppose it is a matter of different perspectives. I see it as a group of people who are being discriminated against, while many people see it as people being denied the right to discriminate. Much like civil rights movement, people can be stuck in the ways of old. The fact is however that sexual preference will be a protected category and our military needs to be ready and accept that.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Brad Sand
MSG Brad Sand
>1 y
2d Lt (Join to see)

Cool. I am going to let the NAZIs and KKK know you are going to support them when they want their cakes baked by Jews and Southern Blacks...because they are being discriminated against? It always amazes me how we can allow...even support and condone...something against the majority that we would never allow against any other group of people?
(0)
Reply
(0)
2d Lt Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences Student
2d Lt (Join to see)
>1 y
The majority of Americans support same sex marriage. I would not compare a married couple to the Nazis however. I hope your personal feelings will not interfere with your ability to lead such soldiers. That would be my biggest concern with your perspective.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LCpl Mark Lefler
1
1
0
I dont see sharia law catching on in any real way, I think its seen in a worse light then gay marriage.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Roberto Mendoza-Diaz
1
1
0
People in this country are really confused with what's going on lately. Hmmm... There is not an easy way to explain this but here we go. (Requesting apologies in advance).
This country is divided between republicans (conservatives) and democrats (liberals) however most homosexuals and most muslims are democrats (liberals) also. Now under Sharia law, homosexuality is big No-No, and yet they are in the same group. Another one, this country is divided between those who own guns (conservatives) and those who want to ban them (liberals). As I mentioned in another post, this country is becoming something similar like in the tv show "Revolution" where waving the American flag and being an American made you a criminal. Next Saturday we are celebrating the Independence Day and as a nation we need to get united once again because our name is United States of America and that's the right thing to do. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!
(1)
Comment
(0)
LTC Bink Romanick
LTC Bink Romanick
>1 y
What does that mean exactly? That means nothing about party affililiation?
(0)
Reply
(0)
PVT Infantryman
PVT (Join to see)
>1 y
LTC Bink Romanick Is it too small to read or something? You have to click the link to make it bigger. The very first graphic shows that 70% of muslims either identify themselves as democrats (that's a party affiliation) or lean democrat.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Ahmed Faried
CPT Ahmed Faried
>1 y
Wow. Black and white world SGT. Conservatives own guns, Liberals want them banned. Would I be a hybrid then if i own guns but agree with sensible regulation to keep them out of the hands of nut bags? You end with a call to celebrate our unity yet your comment is full of the Us vs. Them rhetoric tearing the country apart.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Roberto Mendoza-Diaz
SGT Roberto Mendoza-Diaz
>1 y
Indeed...It is destroying the country apart. By the way I guess I'm a hybrid too.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close