570
562
8
I have been dealing with this a lot. I have seen both ways. As per AR 600–25 the junior person should salute. I see a 1LT senior to a 2LT and I salute them. I have seen many instances where this does not happen. Most see a LT as a LT regardless of being a 1st or 2nd. How do you all feel about this?
"B. All Army personnel in uniform are required to salute when they meet and recognize persons entitled to the salute. Salutes will be exchanged between officers (commissioned and warrant) and enlisted personnel, and with personnel of the Armed Forces of the United States..."
"B. All Army personnel in uniform are required to salute when they meet and recognize persons entitled to the salute. Salutes will be exchanged between officers (commissioned and warrant) and enlisted personnel, and with personnel of the Armed Forces of the United States..."
Edited 11 y ago
Posted 12 y ago
Responses: 1296
I am addressing this from the "How it is" standpoint. As everyone who has posted thus far has addressed the "How it should be" standpoint.<br><br>Simply put, there is a basic professional understanding between Lieutenants that the 2nd Lieutenants do not salute 1st Lieutenants, and 1st Lieutenants do not expect a salute from (and will correct) 2nd Lieutenants who do salute them. Professionally we look at ourselves as peers. Similar to what Warrant Officers do, by my understanding.<br><br>Consider that there is no regulation that says Officers do not wear Marksmanship badges, yet still we do not.<br><br>All Lieutenants salute Captains, and it can be a rough transition fro LT to Captain. (Especially in the Navy! yuck yuck yuck) OK bad joke.<br><br>Bottom Line, you are not wrong for ding it, but it is not culturally accepted within the O-1/O-2 community.<br>
(40)
(3)
CW2 Carl Swanson
Aviation Warrants that came from enlisted ranks don't have an issue with being called "Chief", usually the ones that don't like it are the guys who came straight in to being an Aviation Warrant. I never really understood what the issue was. I have always answered to Chief and regularly refer to other Warrants as Chief, unless they are a WO1.
(1)
(0)
MSG Melvin Miller
Except the regulations are clear and apply to Lieutenants as well as everyone. You cannot hold junior personnel accountable if you are not following regulations yourselves. The military is much larger than Lieutenants or any member. How hard is it to follow the rules? Discipline and order are essential to your profession.
(2)
(0)
SSG John Lasseigne
This is a big problem in the military today. Most every leader I ever had wants to decide when to disregard regulation when it suits them and when to use it a a weapon in the strictest form. That attitude creates low moral and poor attitudes in the troops.
(2)
(0)
If I ever see a 2LT salute a 1LT I am going to give him a counseling statement. I had to do this in OBC and it was ridiculous. Every MTOE in the Army list "LT" as the rank for the position. The purpose of the 1LT is to be a mentor to the 2LT, not create a status distinction. The 2LT is automatically going to be a 1LT in about a year after he joins a unit on his first tour of duty. The 2LT has enough superiors, he needs a buddy. If you want to go with the rank approach I guess we need to get DOR on everyone. I know CPTs that are five years apart in rank and regard each other as equals.
I can respect the positional approach if one is a Commander. I personally encourage the two other Colonels in my brigade not to call me Sir - but it doesn't seem to do any good.
I can respect the positional approach if one is a Commander. I personally encourage the two other Colonels in my brigade not to call me Sir - but it doesn't seem to do any good.
(28)
(2)
Capt James Coursey
LTJG Edward Bangor Jr - Taking him out for a beer and him saluting you are two entirely different subjects. Neither precludes the other.
(0)
(0)
SSG Robert Perrotto
No disrespect intended sir, but a 2LT already has his mentor and "buddy" - they are called Sergeants First Class. In public, the regulation is clear - what you want is irrelevant regardless of the rank you hold sir, there are no exceptions. this is a clear case of unwritten rules over ruling the written rules, should LTC's not salute COL's? - by your logic sir, they are both Colonels, and can have non leadership positions.
(1)
(0)
SSG Robert Perrotto
while on this subject, the Practice of officers calling each other by their first names, especially in front of the Soldiers, is a terrible practice, and should be dissuaded. we are not civilians, we are Soldiers, and should act accordingly.
(1)
(0)
SFC Domingo M.
I was always under the impression that higher-ranking officers abdicated the responsibility of training a 2Lt to the Platoon Sergeant he was assigned to. I know I broke in a few myself. This is especially true during the preparation for an AGI .
(0)
(0)
Wow, is this really a debate? Its been awhile since I was a 2LT and then a 1LT, but a simple answer is NO. Its just the way it is for lots of good reasons. While there is a difference in experience, they are really just different pay grades, more than different ranks as far as the positions they hold and what is expected of them. If during my 26+ years I ever saw a 2LT salute a 1LT I would have laughed out loud.
(36)
(11)
MSgt Hal Weeden, MBA
Maj (Join to see) - Perhaps I should qualify my answer by mentioning that I spent the first 14 years of my career in Air Training Command and it's successor Air Education & Training Command.
(1)
(0)
Maj (Join to see)
MSgt Hal Weeden, MBA - I see what you are saying. In training it could be different, especially when it is a student/instructor relationship.
(1)
(0)
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
2LT Tom Waters, JD - Now don't all get offended here. Two Summers ago, I attended a memorial dedication ceremony in Vermont for Merrill Edson, the famous leader of the leader the First Raider Battalion, "Edson's Raiders", in WWII. One for the speakers there was a VNG Brigadier, it's the VNG's Deputy Commander, I believe, who had been a USMC Lance Corporal before leaving the Marines to join the Army. This answered an age-old question for me: "what is the Army equivalent rank of a Marine Lance Corporal?" Obviously, a Brigadier General!
(1)
(0)
I see a pattern here: almost everyone who has never been an officer thinks O1's should salute O2's, and almost all the officers know better. In my experience, LT= LT, always. While the technical reading of the regulations may be correct, in this case it has almost never been practiced in our military (not just the Army), and likely never will.<div><br></div><div>I would add that if a 1LT is expecting 2LT's to salute and call him/her Sir or Ma'am, something is wrong. I have seen it and corrected it when I could, but outside of official ceremonies, trust me: you need LT's to have that bond.</div><div><br></div><div>Some have compared this to a SPC standing at parade rest for a CPL -- I think it's more like a PFC/SPC relationship. That SPC will soon be a SGT, and the PFC will be required to afford the SGT proper customs and courtesies. Until then, they need the bonds of friendship that lower rank allows.</div><div><br></div><div>Besides that, what's the difference between a PFC and a 2LT? The PFC has been promoted.</div>
(30)
(6)
CPT (Join to see)
Ssgt Harriott, it is in the official training, not "I don't give a ****" Although as a former spouse to a Marine for 10 years, I am used to hearing Staff Sergeant and I don't think I will get in any trouble calling someone Staff Sergeant.
(0)
(0)
CDR Michael Goldschmidt
SSgt, your dealing with a translation problem: you have to recognize that USMC and USA have different traditions. When you're on their turf, it's best to respect their traditions and not to be offended unnecessarily. I had a similar translation problem with an Army COL I worked for. I would greet him every morning with "Good morning, Colonel Murphy." He asked me one day if I didn't like him. To be addressing him that way was the most respectful by Navy tradition, yet least respectful by Army tradition. I adapted and simply addressed him as "Sir".
(3)
(0)
SGT Jimmy Carpenter
Sir, the joke about the PFC and LT reminded me of my LT when I was a PFC. I told him that technically I out ranked him because I'd been promoted twice.
(2)
(0)
SGT Bryan O'Reilly
CDR Michael Goldschmidt - Call a USMC 1SG 'Top' like I did once on a joint-op and you will find out the difference tut-suite!
(5)
(0)
For the love of gawd, please drag this dead horse off the battlefield!!! :D
(19)
(0)
SFC Michael Hartwig
I believe the original question was SHOULD a 2LT salute a 1LT. The answer is yes will alwasy be yes an will continue to be yes. Do they? I don't give a shit but don't let me catch one not rendering a salute. I will fix your damn traditions quick fast and in a hurry.
(1)
(0)
SFC William Swartz Jr
I guess it was just me and the first Officers that I had contact with back in '88 who "explained" to me that 2LTs do not salute 1LTs because..."Rank among LTs is like virtue among whores, non-existent!"...and as an NCO, I would never have interjected myself into the interactions of 2 LTs, maybe I would have asked later, when the two of us were alone why no salute, but definitely never in a public setting.
(3)
(0)
SFC William Swartz Jr
Sorry sir that is how it was "explained" to me as a young PFC, wasn't my analogy, just how it was phrased.
(0)
(0)
I am an O2 and when I was an O1 I saluted the O2 because it was the right thing to do in front of the troops. Now when and O1 does not salute me, I do not say anything, but I have great Senior NCOs who talk to anyone who fails to salute a officer that is senior to them. Plus, it keeps you in the habit for the even higher ranking officers.
(18)
(0)
CPT Ray Doeksen
SSG James Palmer, I'd be happy to ... first off, thank you for *asking* for clarification, in the last year you're the first example of that I've experienced on RP. Re-reading this now, I was being sarcastic, and either that didn't come across to a couple of people, or they would rather neg me than the guys that were serious, for whatever reason. I did find some of the alternative takes on the topic troublesome, and some of the replies in this thread made me want to flip the table and walk away from RallyPoint altogether.
I think LT Rosa was posing the question without editorial bias in the first place, since he cited chapter and verse (AR 600-25) and I have every expectation he knew the right answer.
On the surface of it, I didn't like LT Yates' approach - mostly because he didn't seem to acknowledge that he needs to have a good explanation for not making an immediate correction to a 2LT when they are likely to be under the watchful eyes of ... everyone, but in particular the junior enlisted. Nobody in the Army should be particularly surprised when a 2LT makes a mistake, but everyone should expect that they can count on a 1LT to straighten them out; they're in a perfect position to do so.
There's really only one way that I'd accept LT Yates' answer: if he was running such a tight unit that everyone ELSE besides the noob 2LT knew that corrective action was going to happen, and quick, and it was because of Yates' standards matching Army standards.
If I had a senior NCO who worked closely enough with me and was good at talking to junior officers, that he could take my nod, note, text message or other tip-off as a cue to have a quiet moment with the 2LT and diplomatically sort it out, that's one thing. Just thinking that your senior NCOs are going to clean up the mess and do the work for you is another, and not nearly good enough.
I think LT Rosa was posing the question without editorial bias in the first place, since he cited chapter and verse (AR 600-25) and I have every expectation he knew the right answer.
On the surface of it, I didn't like LT Yates' approach - mostly because he didn't seem to acknowledge that he needs to have a good explanation for not making an immediate correction to a 2LT when they are likely to be under the watchful eyes of ... everyone, but in particular the junior enlisted. Nobody in the Army should be particularly surprised when a 2LT makes a mistake, but everyone should expect that they can count on a 1LT to straighten them out; they're in a perfect position to do so.
There's really only one way that I'd accept LT Yates' answer: if he was running such a tight unit that everyone ELSE besides the noob 2LT knew that corrective action was going to happen, and quick, and it was because of Yates' standards matching Army standards.
If I had a senior NCO who worked closely enough with me and was good at talking to junior officers, that he could take my nod, note, text message or other tip-off as a cue to have a quiet moment with the 2LT and diplomatically sort it out, that's one thing. Just thinking that your senior NCOs are going to clean up the mess and do the work for you is another, and not nearly good enough.
(0)
(0)
CPT Ray Doeksen
SSG Palmer, by emphasizing 'asking' I wasn't implying that you could not demand, in fact I do think you have a right (and a responsibility, when it's the serious stuff) to ask for clarification when things are left vague. I'm remembering a moment from Iraq, when a certain senior officer told a Bradley crew to "Light 'em up!" over the radio, and the vehicle commander (an E6 I believe) very diplomatically asked him to rephrase his last transmission. That clarification saved a few lives.
(0)
(0)
CPT Dave Brest
I was both a 2LT and a 1LT, and saluted/ was saluted in both positions. Why not ? Does not a LTC salute a Col ?
(0)
(0)
While I personally believe that rank among LTs is like virtue among prostitutes, the standard is the standard. It was difficult for me as a former NCO and newly-minted 2LT to see the average 1LT as a warrior peer worthy of a salute (remember that the salute originated as a greeting between warriors to show that each one was not a threat to the other). The bottom line is that, as a leader, you have to swallow your pride and follow regs in all things. Joe and Jane are watching to see what right looks like.
(16)
(0)
Good question, thanks for asking. Let me just answer it with a quote from General Patton; “If you can't get them to salute when they should salute and wear the clothes you tell them to wear, how are you going to get them to die for their country?”
(15)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Sir, I think this young marine almost getting his face shot off while violating the almighty uniform regulations would disagree with Patton's statement.
(4)
(0)
(6)
(0)
Simple, yes a junior officer should salute a senior officer, its all about military customs and courtesy.
(14)
(0)
Suspended Profile
Not sure I ever saw that during my time. Never even thought about it, good point SFC Joe S. Davis Jr., MSM, DSL
Officers need to remember that Enlisted are 'entitled' to that salute too. You just get it first because of your rank. <div><br></div><div>I recently was surprised by a Major who actually remembered that. I had my hands full and gave the greeting of the day as he passed and he returned my verbal salute with a physical one. </div>
(12)
(0)
Capt (Join to see)
This is an excellent point. It's one that my uncle, a Marine O-6, continually stresses to me. While I am sure that in his squadron things are done a little differently as a result, during my enlisted years I never once had this happen to me. In fact, I was once even chewed out for NOT saluting while both my hands were full of gear I was moving out of the barracks. You can bet I was not rendered this courtesy, despite the fact that I gave him the proper greeting of the day.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
This explains why I was saluted while on patrol (I am an MP) walking outside the dfac, in a crowd of people. Im not going to salute while under arms and walking through a crowd, but I still gave the proper greeting of the day to an LTC and CPT who walked by, promptly replied and rendered a salute.
(2)
(0)
SSG Kevin McCulley
Indeed.. MPs don't show the courtesy (salutes, attention, parade rest ect.. ) as a safety issue. They weren't saluting you.. they were returning the one you couldn't give.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next


Officers
Customs and Courtesies
Army
Saluting
AR 600-25
