Posted on Jan 10, 2015
SSG Engagement Control Team Leader
16.7K
77
44
5
5
0
The commander of the US Army Combined Arms Center, LTG Brown said, "They grew up on Google and wear ponytails. We need to look at ways to bring them into the Army without necessarily going through the same training procedures as our combat troops."

Should we make exemptions for cyber soldiers or should all soldiers be expected to conduct combat training? Should these soldier be required to qualify with weapons and pass the APFT?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11289977/Google-generation-US-Army-cyber-warriors-may-be-excused-combat-training.html
Posted in these groups: Images %2831%29 CyberFc859cb3 Basic Combat Training (BCT)
Avatar feed
Responses: 26
TSgt Tim (lj) Littlejohn
2
2
0
In this day and age when a terrorist attack could come at any time in any place, firearm training is a must. Being physically fit, so as to be able go hours with out sleep, and defend your self. Cyber Warriors are very important to us. Please give them the training to stay alive.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1LT Platoon Leader
2
2
0
I think the real problem would be discipline.

Can we be 100% sure those kids would be loyal and committed to the Armed Forces ?

It seems more like the Army is desperately seeking for help, because it lacks skills and knowledge..
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG (ret) William Martin
2
2
0
Edited 9 y ago
Nope, they can train, 20k road march, APFT, throw a grenade or two, shoot a crew serve, and hump their laptop up a mountain.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT John Wesley
1
1
0
I think we should use every asset available to us, and the "Cyber Warriors" should be Exempt from combat training. These people are not ever going to see real combat on the ground. We actually should employ them at a GS level and forgoe the uniform equivalent.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Paul Labrador
1
1
0
If there is a chance that they are going to be doing what they are do in theater, then yes. They need to know how to at least defend themselves, same as any support Soldier.
(1)
Comment
(0)
CDR Dan Campbell
CDR Dan Campbell
9 y
The Marines have it right...every Marine is a rifleman first.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Zachary Brooks
1
1
0
Britain has been looking into similar for at least a few months, I recall reading about it before.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/lovesick-cyborg/2015/03/08/cyber-warriors-need-not-soldiers/#.VRG53-EvFBE

While I understand the perspective of this, it would also disrupt the professional force. If you plan to be outside of the fitness and combat standards, then why not just use contractors?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Jim Z.
1
1
0
Once you make an exception for one MOS you have to do it for all thus lowering the standards. No they should go through the same combat training that they currently go through.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
0
0
0
I don't care what the MOS is, soldiers need combat training. Look at all the soldiers in the Battle of The Bulge who became Infantry. A former army cook took on a German battalion by himself and ultimately earned the Medal of Honor. We need soldiers who have the skill to shoot, move, and communicate.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Ken Landgren
0
0
0
They would be more valuable and well rounded if they know a modicum of tactics and strategy.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Bink Romanick
0
0
0
Soldiers should be soldiers and be trained like soldiers.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close