Should HRC place NCOs on assignment below their current skill level?
Recently I was placed on assignment to Germany. The other
day I received my Levy packet as I reviewed my packet I saw it had me projected
to 91B20 level duty position. When I talked to my Branch Manager and told him
about this he explained its not a bad thing for me to be placed one level below
my current level. Even though I explained to him that I was holding a 40 level
position and attending SLC this summer. He could only say it was O.K. and that
the only thing i could do was check back with him every month to see if any
openings come available. My thoughts where as NCO's we should be leaning
forward and trying to advance in our careers by placing ourselves or fighting
for the duty positions with more responsibilities.
I would call him again and explain that that is unacceptable. You're not arguing a duty station or a special assignment. You're asking to be placed in a job that meets your qualifications.
It's not an unreasonable request in the slightest.
It's not OK at all, it could affect your career. It's one thing to be stuck behind a desk or pulling shift work at a job with no Soldiers. It's another thing altogether to be rated on a 20 level position with someone at your level about to goto SLC getting looked at for SFC.

SFC (P) Gilley I did email CSM Uhlig about this matter and did provide him with the documents he asked for. You are correct it is on me to do the leg work and network to get the position I'm looking for.
Seriously though it won't look good as it was stated earlier the full picture won't be available to the board and even if your current NCOER is great it will look inconsistent and when they only have a short time per packet you can't afford any distractions.
I am not saying my branch manager is a bad person or not doing his job. He has helped me with deferring my orders for 90 days. Since my report date is also around the sametime my wife is due to give birth. However I do wish it was a little easier to lock in a job that would better support the soldier in his or her career and not just full filling slots.
I understand how it works, I was placed into the 40 level position because someone in my chain of command said i could do the job. I understand when I PCS if there are no 40 level slots open I would/should move back to 30 level slot. What I am getting at is HRC should be able to work with each indivual soldier to place them where they would excel and not down a skill level.
I assume you're referring to the 10/20/30/40 portion of the MOS code, but I'd think we'd be hard pressed to prove grade and skill have been connected for decades.

PCS
Responsibility
Germany
