Posted on Jan 21, 2015
COL Senior Strategic Cyber Planner
3.68K
13
18
1
1
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 9
PO1 Disaster Survivor Assistance Specialist
3
3
0
NO. NYET. NEIN. DAME. OHHELLNO. WHACHUTALKINBOUTFOOL?
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Stephen Brinkley (Scott)
1
1
0
COL (Join to see) No matter how I want to answer this is with a resilient no, I have to answer with a yes. Why? Because we do not have a president that will stand up to them and assist other countries when they do as well.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Mark Merino
1
1
0
NHK World (Japanese tv spoken in English) has stopped reporting on the situation since the alleged beheading.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Rick West
Cpl Rick West
11 y
No
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Disaster Survivor Assistance Specialist
PO1 (Join to see)
11 y
SHITDAMNHELLFUCK
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Aviation Operations Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
11 y
Were they beheaded already?!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Avatar feed
Should Japan negotiate with ISIS?
SGT Jim Z.
0
0
0
NO they should not but it is their prerogative if they do.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
GySgt Lucian J Caldara
0
0
0
Definitely "NO" on negotiation. Unless the "negotiation" is.. either you release them now, unharmed or Japan will enter the war on Terror and send their "Self Defense Force" in and wipe out the area who held them. Any give will only encourage more hostage taking.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Aviation Operations Specialist
0
0
0
They should negotiate with bombs! Give us our people or face our wrath.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Operations Officer (Opso)
0
0
0
No. We should not negotiate with terrorists or even consider trading anything with anyone.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG Eric Rice
0
0
0
There are things that must be considered in this situation that most people are not aware of. Should Japan negotiate with the terrorist? Maybe they should because it may be their best option.

The Japanese Constitution prohibits them from having an aggressive army. This is the result of the United States and Japanese agreements after WWII. They are not allowed to operate militarily outside of the Japan as they are labeled as a Self Defense Force.

From a military perspective they cannot legally extract the Japanese citizens at least not that I am aware of. So what is the best course of action to defend their citizens?
(0)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Disaster Survivor Assistance Specialist
PO1 (Join to see)
11 y
AGREEMENT? Uh...NO. MacArthur dictated and Japan said "yes sir, three bags full, sir!" on their constitution.

Most recently the Japanese Government is actively pursuing a change in the JSDF restrictions vis-a-vis the Japanese constitution. With China becoming the looming issue at sea - I think this issue with ISIS/ISIL will help drive the Japanese people to authorize the necessary changes to their constitution that will enable Japan to cease being the quiet mouse in the corner and joining the U.S., etc., in becoming a true player in the world stage. IMO, this is something way overdue.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1SG Eric Rice
1SG Eric Rice
11 y
Unfortunately PO1 George M. the people of Japan are quite passive and the culture has changed drastically since WWII. Yes Prime Minister Abe is actively pursuing a change in how their Constitution is interpreted and amend the use of the Self Defense Force but I do not see a anything happening soon. I have seen the JGSDF in action and they are a very capable of engaging an enemy combatant not if but when the time comes.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Disaster Survivor Assistance Specialist
PO1 (Join to see)
11 y
1SG Eric Rice Perhaps you're correct. Perhaps in my 10 years living and working with the Japanese in Misawa I met an entirely different people. During those years I worlked with JASDF, JMSDF and JGSDF - the soldiers, sailors and airmen I met were fiercely proud to defend their country - just as we are to defend America. While none of them would openly contradict their constitution or leadership, in private with people they found honorable and trustworthy they would hint at how they felt about being held back by constitutional limitations.

Quiet - yes. Passive - not so much.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1SG Eric Rice
1SG Eric Rice
11 y
PO1 George M. I agree that they are "fiercely proud to defend their country" and are very capable. I have only been here 8 months and have made many friends but have not discussed in detail how they feel about the constitutional limitations. Now that you have peaked my interest a little more I will reassess my observations. I greatly appreciate the conversation.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Mark Merino
0
0
0
Hitomi says they have a better chance having a public works project named after them worth the $200M.
(0)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Disaster Survivor Assistance Specialist
PO1 (Join to see)
11 y
SFC Mark Merino Hitomi is most likely correct. However, I believe if the two Japanese are killed and the video is seen by the Japanese people there may well be a change in the way the Japanese see things. I'd be interested in what your wife thinks about that idea......
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close