Should Maneuver Company Grade Officers attend Master Gunner School?

It is a technical mastery that is wasted on the professional officer who trains and learns to trust his NCO's
While all knowledge is good, and an Armor officer who had the knowledge you have to have to get in to MG school, and the knowledge you leave with would not be bad.. It would be wasted. a better question is, what is that company grade officer doing to fix his unit, that is so broken, he is being distracted from his duties to those assigned and tasked to his NCO's?
Thus feeling the need get the required prereq experience to attend MG school, and the knowledge gained from it? Additionally, who is doing that company grade officers job while he is playing NCO?

Simply stated, it's NCO business. I think there is a big problem when officers don't let NCOs do their job then wonder why they don't have competent NCOs. As someone else stated Master Gunner school has a pre-requisite of significant experience with the weapons system, Bradley or M1. I feel it is more important for Armor and Cavalry officers to attend Scout Platoon leader's course (if it still exists) and/or Ranger school. I was fortunate to attend both and I feel it made me a better PL. I relied on my NCOs to be the SMEs in gunnery. One thing to add is the Armor lieutenant does command his tank and must be proficient in gunnery but it's also important to have a highly competent gunner on the vehicle to supervise the crew.

No, this is just another way to say that you don't trust your NCO's. This is a position that is given to a trusted NCO that has met all his required task and has proven his ability to handle the position. With that said, would you like for NCO's attending your required courses?