Posted on Sep 4, 2016
MSG Military To Military (M2 M) Ncoic
39.4K
1.46K
312
14
14
0
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/09/politics/navy-sailor-sits-national-anthem/index.html

I know many even wondered why I asked this question. I knew it was going to be a matter of time. I hope justice is served to this Sailor.

Here is another protest during the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance. By a State Senator, no less.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/16/missouri-state-senator-sits-during-pledge-allegiance.html
Posted in these groups: Human rights logo Human RightsFreedom of speech logo Freedom of Speech
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 148
CPT Jack Durish
101
101
0
You forgot to include "Hell no"
(101)
Comment
(0)
SPC Les Darbison
SPC Les Darbison
>1 y
Sgt Justin Vickers - Your Right And I agree all active duty should stand for the Anthem and I feel most Veterans and there family members will always do so . Is the protocol here to stay solely on the original topic or to expand and have real open debate on the status of , and the direction our Country is headed. The potential of our current liberals leaders and if Hillary is allowed to continue Obamas Agenda to fundamentally change America our Constitution is at risk of fundamentally being changed for ever ! I have a real problems with Hillary who left Americans to die to cover her and Obamas political collective assess. And the colution in Government at ever level to defend the efforts by liberal progressives IE Socialist to curb free speach ,and personial freedoms laid out in the Constatution and the Bill of Rights.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Les Darbison
SPC Les Darbison
>1 y
SPC Les Darbison - Every thing is all tied together nothing stands alone. Like our leaders defending Islam and attacking Christianity in General and definitely doing so in Military .
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Ronnie Kelly
MSgt Ronnie Kelly
>1 y
SPC Kwesi Morris - Roger that
(2)
Reply
(0)
PV2 Glen Lewis
PV2 Glen Lewis
>1 y
SGT (Verify To See) - I think perhaps it is a chance to vent your feelings on this to more than to just friends and family.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt David Tedrow
65
65
0
Edited >1 y ago
You should not be wearing the uniform and serving if your belief system goes against the United States and it's customs and courtesies. Everyone takes an oath:
ENLISTED
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."
OFFICER
"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance tot he same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."

The key phrase here is "that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same".
(65)
Comment
(0)
Bergman Oswell
Bergman Oswell
6 y
CPT Lawrence Cable - By that standard, members of the US military are not and cannot be US citizens. The Constitution does not say that the rights it enumerates are conditional on not being an active member of the militia, nor does it specify that the highest court might lack jurisdiction over a portion of the citizens of the United States. The only thing it does have to say on the matter, is the prohibition on creating a less privileged class of citizen.

But suppose you're right and the law does support everything you claimed -- I'm sure you can cite the relevant portion of the Constitution, and explain why, with a government subordinate to that Constitution in every way, the government is able to designate a group of citizens that are exempt from that Constitution, yet somehow remain citizens.

I won't hold my breath, though.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
6 y
Bergman Oswell - The link provided has the applicable case law and the Supreme Court of the United States has final say in the matter of interpreting the Constitution. Then when you add this part of the Militia clause, "Clause 16. The Congress shall have Power * * * To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress." , it allows for the organizing and disciplining of the Militia as prescribed by Congress, which is what Uniform Code of Military Justice provides, a method of disciplining the Militia and Regular Army. More pertinent information. https://law.justia.com/constitution/us/article-1/58-the-militia-clauses.html
(0)
Reply
(0)
Bergman Oswell
Bergman Oswell
6 y
CPT Lawrence Cable - Congress also has the authority under the Constitution, to enact laws for civilians, which must conform to the Constitution or they are rendered null and void by it. Where in the Constitution does the Constitution say that Congress can do whatever it wants to the military, even if it would be unconstitutional?
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Lawrence Cable
CPT Lawrence Cable
6 y
Bergman Oswell - It does not have the authority to organize or discipline civilians, it does Militia and Military. There are plenty of links to the case law in the post above, read them if your are really interested. Be aware that your interpretation of the Constitution doesn't mean anything without case law to back it up.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Retired
51
51
0
Only if their legs are broken as well as their crutches.
(51)
Comment
(0)
CAPT Hiram Patterson
CAPT Hiram Patterson
>1 y
Yes, only for physical impairment! Unless you want to explain yourself to the XO, CMC or CSM!
(6)
Reply
(0)
Sgt SHF Satellite Communications Operator-Maintainer
Sgt (Join to see)
>1 y
Motivation
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close