Should POTUS relinquish his Twitter account?

I hate auto-correct his tweats should be filtered through his staff sometimes, maybe Amerosa?

am guessing you're being cynical about Omarosa, she of acid tongue could teach him a thing or two about being abrasive, I hope she's better after her injury at the Whitehouse, I think she got her foot lodged in her mouth or maybe had a severe case of cranial-anal insertion, definitely in the top 10 of most hatefully rude and dismissive people alive

Yes, 1SG Michael Sadowski - being straightforward and honest is the only way to go. However, there is nothing wrong with being diplomatic about what one says and how it is said. Ill-intended comments meant to "hurt someone's feelings" or, worse, defame character, can be slanderous. If enforcement of the laws still happens, instead of what seems to be selective targeting of some folks with some enforcement, but not others, then there would already be plenty of both libel and slander cases; enough to keep attorneys busy for a very long time. Seems that politicians are considered immune to enforcement of many laws.

CWO3 (Join to see) - Maybe trump could hire a proctologist so everybody can find their heads.

Damn... I wish I could have gotten away with criticizing the President when I was on Active Duty.

There is a lot I could say about our president, however given the political climate, I am not eager to have my name put on any more lists than it already is on - simply because some folks in government are influenced by foreign PACs (illegal of course), or a politician in a foreign nation (who is a dual citizen) does not like what I say; more precisely does not like the facts I share (because I have done the required research). Corrupt propagandists prefer to not have the facts made public because they contradict the repetitive propaganda most folks buy into.
I have no doubt the same dynamic could be, has been, and is used by folks in our own government in an unwarranted ways to damage anyone's career. Sure it requires corruption. But if it is not simply a matter of corruption being more visible, then there certainly seems to be a lot more instances of corruption throughout government at all levels than there was several decades ago. Either way it does not bode well for we, the people.
We (law abiding people) are all between a rock and a hard place when it comes to the reality of being threatened because of speaking up (limiting opportunities of all types, harm to family and friends who are being used and abused, the list goes on . . . ). Never thought I would see such situations come to unwelcome fruition in our own nation. Sometimes it seems like the world around us is Usa, U.S.S.R., 1950s instead of 2017 U.S.A.

PO3 Bob McCord - then why even have this posted as a question if no one is (technically) able to respond?? That makes no sense at all.

PO2 Robert M. - I can take a tantrum better than deceit ,IMO,he may be the most candid president we have ever had.

Yes Sir! He is candid.... but the POTUS needs to think before they speak ( I am not just saying Trump...... All of them have to think before they speak ).
There are ramifications for facetious and off the cuff remarks!
I do not know if you are old enough to remember when President Johnson picked up his Beagle by the ears and the nation reacted to that adversely. Such a dumb action like that hurt him temporarily, but not as much as Vietnam.
VIETNAM VETERANS -- WELCOME HOME! Thank YOU for your sacrifices and service!!!

PO2 Robert M. - I am old enough,but probably was in VN when he did that. lol
Thank you
Semper Fi

"There are ramifications for facetious and off the cuff remarks!"
A certain incident with President Reagan comes to mind..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgSSRE27GQ0

Actually not so, just like when we signed the dotted line and subjugated our selves to the UCMJ giving up many of our rights, to serve. This also applies to the President and other officials. It is one of the checks to limit corruption & abuse of authority. It is also in the Public Interest and National Security. Men are not perfect so and can manipulated so these are safeguards.

Cpl Lance Rider - The President does not give up his rights when he takes office. He is still a civilian with all the rights and privileges thereof. As far as I know there is no law on the books that limits the President's Constitutionally protected rights. If you know of such a law please link it, I would be very interested in reading it.

Of course the president does not give up his rights as a citizen. But the position of trust associated with the office does impose some limits for the purposes of national security. So does the military; so do many employers especially if some type of clearance is required.

SGT Mary G. - True. Hillary Clinton should never have been selected for Secretary of State, nor given the access, power, and authority she had. I hope her clearances are stripped, and she spends the rest of her life in the SuperMax in Colorado, right next to the terrorists and criminals she seemed to love to empower.

Okay....critics can rest their case.

OMG.